We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henderson Grp | LSE:HGI | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B249J983 | ORD 12.5P |
| Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 52.50 | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
| Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - |
| Last Trade Time | Trade Type | Trade Size | Trade Price | Currency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | O | 0 | 52.50 | GBX |
Henderson (HGI) Share Charts1 Year Henderson Chart |
|
1 Month Henderson Chart |
Intraday Henderson Chart |
| Trade Time | Trade Price | Trade Size | Trade Value | Trade Type |
|---|
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 28/3/2008 10:52 by fillipe Hi everyone.I've been following HGI for quite a while now, but still struggle to fully find out what's going on there. It's started to look like a reasonable punt now it's nearing the 100p area. Anyone thinking likewise?Thks. f |
Posted at 25/10/2007 22:25 by gbb483 The price hike over the last few days is just a correction for the mis-alignment of the special dividend and the stock consolidation. If the share price had been 138p then it would've been ok, as it was closer to 175p pre consolidation, it's had to adjust to 185p post consolidation. |
Posted at 15/8/2007 13:47 by skythelimit I have been following the latest thread on Henderson with interest. I am particularly indebted to Bohemia for the letter he attaches from J Kyle Bass of Hayman about the smoke and mirrors exercise used to dump sub prime risk on unwitting and credulous investors. It is outrageous. Moreover Bohemia is correct that it is unfair that such an august name like the Henderson Group is now being tarnished with participation. But like Simon Cawkwell I too have heard such rumours and from more than one source. Can I suggest that a senior officer of Henderson issues a statement to the market that such rumours are baseless and without foundation and clear this matter up?However I must disagree that it is a defence that a AAA rated fund is marketed to investors who believe that the AAA rating reflects the quality of the investments when it only reflects the previous PERFORMANCE. If I bought into such a fund believing that I was buying a portfolio of well-managed AAA rated instruments only to discover they were ZZZ, I would rightly feel I was misled and would certainly seek redress in law for any loss that I had consequently suffered. But even if these damaging rumours about Henderson are indeed baseless, I must concur with both Bohemia and Simon Cawkwell that Henderson is a sell. On fundamentals it is over-valued by at least 35 pence. Its recent highs have been propelled by bull market sentiment. I foresee market gravity taking it back to 100p in the near future. But if any of those rumours about Henderson prove true, though my name is Skythelimit, the Henderson share price will be a case of Plumbthedepths. |
Posted at 13/8/2007 21:48 by bohemia Surely though the rating is the responsibility of S&P and or Moodys, unless someone - the originator or intermediary - mis-stated what the underlying loans were like. But HGI wouldn't appear to fill that role, and it seems a little unfair to level that against them Simon.Not that there isn't a great deal of litigation to come. This is well worth a read: (Disclaimer: I am short HGI anyhow!) |
Posted at 07/8/2007 12:57 by simon cawkwell Gentlemen,I understand that HGI has run into trouble on derivatives in mortgage debt markets. I do not yet know whether this is on their own account through proprietary trading or for their clients or both. Time will tell. Simon Cawkwell |
Posted at 30/11/2006 11:12 by abeetle3 Perpetual have just declared a large interest in henderson and the price seems to be reflecting this. it's certainly not stuck now! |
Posted at 28/7/2006 17:01 by peaeff What's your reasoning for that statement BG.I haven't read the document referred to as yet but, as I see it, if the share price were to go to 90p by October they will be buying our shares at a cut price of 78p, the assumption being I suppose that having taken out of the market place 256.5million shares the price would rise and therefore compensate you by virtue of the remaining shares you hold. I don't know if that's such a good deal, sometimes things don't go according to plan, but as I say I will wait for the document to arrive before making any further decisions. On a purely trading note everything in the garden is reported as rosey but the share price seems to be stuck around it's present level. If someone out there has read the document please fill us in and if I have gotten this wrong please advise. Regards PF |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
