Greatland Gold Share Discussion Threads

[uknighted] 31/10/2022 14:46

H75 believe what you like.
I shall not be responding further as life is too short to spend time communicating with the likes of you.

[uknighted] 31/10/2022 14:29

H75 I have never been a ‘big’ investor nor loser in either share you mentioned - depends what you call big, it’s all relative (probably 500 shares in your case).

[telbap] 31/10/2022 12:41

Wow this is looking like the lurker and Saracen show.....you guys must Uber under desperate to see the share price lower? Your motives are as Clear as a sheet of glass

[telbap] 31/10/2022 12:38

Lol. Waiting for answer from @hallend

[uknighted] 31/10/2022 12:14

Halland75, how is your EUA investment? Sleeping alright?

[saracen3] 31/10/2022 09:11

Looks like 7p to 8.5p likely trading range till feasibility study released next year.

[alangriffbang] 29/10/2022 19:33

Lurker5 ,sorry about that I’ve just come back from seeing Brighton thrash Chelsea ,looks like Jaka has given you the answer ,good luck,

[jaka] 29/10/2022 16:51

No advice, just a very, very brief report on the results. No actual mention of NCM in name just says JV partner Australia's largest miner. Hardly worth the ink.

[lurker5] 29/10/2022 15:06

But what does it say Jaka ? Buy, hold, sell ? These newspaper 'tips' merely parrot what brokers might be saying. But they often spur some sort of immediate action by the more naive pi's,

[jaka] 29/10/2022 14:13

Don't bother, just reporting what we already know. They single out a popular retail stock every other day, and today was Greatland's. Losses doubled and that they were well funded. Took about 15 seconds to read.

[lurker5] 29/10/2022 13:19

Thanks, Can't see it. Can you post a link ? Do you mean the Daily Mail ? Or some other Mail ?

[alangriffbang] 29/10/2022 11:02

Lurker 5 there is a write up on GGP in the mail business section today it doesn’t read well and doesn’t inspire confidence , another one for the jam tomorrow drawer ,good luck,

[lurker5] 28/10/2022 20:22

Don't forget the delay means a substantial increase in costs - latest mining and capital equipment quotes have been rocketing away - and gold price is lower. So the updated FS could show a worse NPV. NCM aren't fools to have declined the 5%. More worry and drift will probably see shares well down over next six months. Any increased resources won't compensate for the medium term worries.

[saracen3] 28/10/2022 19:30

Please check out my comments with an experienced mining project planner.

[saracen3] 28/10/2022 19:25

And this whenever is a PFS not a Bankable study and a long way to go on environmental studies. Decision to mine is a long way off.

[paddygall] 28/10/2022 19:07

I'm pretty sure that they did want to buy the 5%, just not at the price that the independent valuer went for.FS delay makes absolutely no difference to the project timeline as the decline is already under way and the finance is already in place, what it will make a difference to is the project value as they will be looking to improve the tonnage from the SLOS which at 2.37g/t will make a huge difference to the NPV.Newcrest will be updating their resources in February as normal, I'd say there's a better than evens chance the FS will be around that time.ATB Paddy

[saracen3] 28/10/2022 18:51

Starting again on a. feasibility study is minimum 6 months, might be more. Back to the drawing board. It has taken a year so far.