ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for charts Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.

GDP Goldplat Plc

7.50
0.00 (0.00%)
24 Apr 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Goldplat Plc LSE:GDP London Ordinary Share GB00B0HCWM45 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 7.50 7.20 7.80 7.50 7.50 7.50 750 08:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Gold Ores 41.88M 2.8M 0.0167 4.49 12.58M
Goldplat Plc is listed in the Gold Ores sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker GDP. The last closing price for Goldplat was 7.50p. Over the last year, Goldplat shares have traded in a share price range of 5.60p to 9.25p.

Goldplat currently has 167,782,667 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Goldplat is £12.58 million. Goldplat has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 4.49.

Goldplat Share Discussion Threads

Showing 22176 to 22196 of 29525 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  893  892  891  890  889  888  887  886  885  884  883  882  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
03/5/2018
14:07
Lets have another investor roadshow; directortalk; pr adventure.GDP just needs to deliver.
russman
03/5/2018
13:53
Hi DD,

No offence taken, I shouldn't really feed the troll, although I must admit, he has taken a turn for the worse, with his, multiple aliases posting on the same board, saying different things.

Pretty weird, for someone who claims to be so wealthy and busy. Still never mind, he has others to froth at the mouth at now.

He hasn't got under my skin, I was simply winding him up, probably shouldn't, I know.

Hope your investments are doing well.

sea7
03/5/2018
09:40
Hi S7,Hope you're doing okay, I see nothing has changed much here!.....GDP management still foooking things up and you are still battling with scum.Don't take offence as do have a lot of respect for you as an investor, but to be honest your obsession with Miller is IMO reflecting worse on you than him. We all know he's got major mental health and psychological issues as well as being a disgusting human being, so why give him your valuable time, it's beyond me tbh. Have seen your incessant battles with him on other threads and it's clear he has got under your skin, thought you had more about you than that, just saying.Anyway, truly not having a pop at you, just don't like to see you get dragged down by a low life like Miller.As for GDP, no doubt you are well in profit and hopefully you will continue to trade it well. Still not for me, never will be.GLDD
discodave4
27/4/2018
09:56
I await some positive developments; not dreams.
russman
26/4/2018
19:01
either way, I doubt they were impressed with having to pony up the cash in the first place.
sea7
26/4/2018
18:34
Well the good news is that a positive value from a discounted cash flow means they expect to make some money.

The bad news is that a discount rate of 17.6% suggests that they are not holding their breath.

kimboy2
26/4/2018
17:29
from harmony gold annual accounts...

Rand Refinery’s shareholders extended Rand Refinery an irrevocable, subordinated loan facility of up to R1.2 billion (US$114.2 million) on 23 July 2014. In December 2014, Rand Refinery drew down R1.02 billion (US$88.1 million) on the shareholders’ loan. Harmony’s portion of the shareholders’ loan was R120 million (US$10.4 million). Interest on the facility is JIBAR plus a margin of 3.5%. During the 2017 financial year, interest received on the loan amounted to R6 million (US$0.4 million) (2016: R12 million (US$0.8 million)). The loan formed part of the net investment in associate and was included in Trade and other receivables.

The original loan facility agreement allowed for any unpaid balance to be converted to equity after two years. An amended agreement was concluded on 5 June 2017, converting the loan to cumulative, redeemable preference shares of no par value. The fair value of the loan on the date of conversion was R71 million (US$5.6 million), resulting in a loss of R15 million (US$1.2 million). The fair value was determined using a discounted cash flow model which included expected dividends and redemption amounts at a discount rate of 17.6%. The fair value measurement is classified as a level 3 model and is non-recurring.

sea7
26/4/2018
12:30
rodson full of it as usual.. you said that you were not daniel miller, you were someone called steve, now we see this...

1rodson - 16 Apr 2018 - 10:18:07 - 55 of 59 Why you should sell this DOG - CRA
NO I THINK THATS ENOUGH REASON DONT YOU?

ITS STILL EARLY DAYS YET.

FIRST ONE TO GET MY NAME RIGHT BUT ITS Mr DANIEL RODSON

sea7
26/4/2018
09:26
Overstating the eps & not bothering to correct it as soon as they were told.
Not bothering to tell investors that Rand refinery cannot process their output for a couple of months.
GDP have to start delivering; not more banana skins.

russman
25/4/2018
19:40
“In line with our commitment to build production output and profitability, the sourcing of by-product material for processing at the recovery operations and improving operational efficiencies at Kilimapesa remain primary areas of strategic focus for the company,” Goldplat said in a statement. The firm produces gold from its own underground mines and a recovery operation that involves processing of ore acquired from nearby artisanal miners who employ crude methods for harvesting.
sea7
25/4/2018
12:24
Trade receivables include a provision for bad debt of £481,000 relating to the Rand Refinery dispute, of which £149,000 was accounted for in the previous years.

The debt was about £800k. I suspect that that they split the difference and agreed to pay their own legal bills.

I said at the start of this litgation process that there was high reputational risk to both sides if they washed their linen in public. It is standard procedure to have a confidentiality clause in all sorts of litigation.

The only difference here is that GDP are required to report it and it is sufficiently unusual that it can be picked out of their accounts.

kimboy2
25/4/2018
11:33
It is normal for legal settlement agreements to bind at least the party who is being paid to confidentiality and often both parties. The reason is that if there is a future dispute RR don't want others saying 'you paid GDP xxxx'

Of course with published accounts one can work it out but that doesn't negate that this is a very normal legal practice. We all have to make our own decisions on the trustworthiness of the management but I don't think adhering to a standard legal norm has any bearing on this.

dangersimpson2
25/4/2018
10:26
PROBLEM IS THEY ARE NOT RELIABLE NOR TRUSTED BY THE MARKET

THINK ABOUT IT HERE WE HAVE A COMPANY THAT ANNOUNCES A DIVI AND QUICKLY WITHDRAWS IT WILL A PROFIT WARNING.....ADD THAT TO ALL THEIR OTHER ACCOUNTING PROBLEMS AND ITS EASY TO SEE WHY THE ARE UNLOVED BY THE MAIN MAN........Being of course Mr Market.

Even of a price raise today you get all sells. No doubt this will settle back to 2p and if they are serious about S American operations we may even see sub 1p

1rodson
25/4/2018
09:37
My suspicion is that RR insisted on confidentiality as a condition of settlement. The precess had been dragging on for years. It must show up somewhere in GDP and RR accounts?
michaelfenton
25/4/2018
08:13
It is undisclosed because that was the agreement.

You can work is out from the interims.

kimboy2
25/4/2018
07:55
RR undisclosed amount paidWhy should this be undisclosed ? This is a public company and we have a right to know how much GP received Should be able to work this out anyway as the difference will end up as a cost in the P@L this year. Unless GP try to hide this, which would be widow dressing
shareholder7
24/4/2018
18:29
It's all herehttp://www.goldplat.com/investor_relations_pages/shareholder-analysis
shareholder7
24/4/2018
17:39
it is worth remembering that back in june 2014, it was reported, that kili was producing, on a daily basis 3.18oz per day, based on the annual figure.

Today, it has been reported that in the last nine months, they have produced 3922 oz from kili - this is 14.31 oz per day. That is a 350% increase in production over the last three years and nine months.

Whilst they have run into some lower grades, which is to be expected, as I have yet to see a gold mine that has a nice, even and fully predictable grade throughout, the increases seen since 2014 show how much work has gone into getting it to where it is today.

They have implemented solutions to address this drop off in grades and we will await the outcome.

Overall, ahead of last year, with plenty of facets to the business in play.

sea7
24/4/2018
17:36
Been in this stock for 5 years or more. Just about in green but starting to think I need to invest in a different story. Problem is this is like doing the same numbers on a lottery, scared to stop or pull out in the slim chance it delivers. As mentioned here today there must be something wrong with the company because one sniff of bad or even only slightly disappointing news punishes the share price

The work done over the last 2-3 years to turnaround business has been impressive but in reality it is only work that should already have been planned, sustainable capex. The transformational stuff Killi profit, TSF simple truck and shovel remember that quote! Rand dispute special dividend mentioned if settled have not happened and are nowhere near to starting.

A steady predictable company like GDP,if they are accumulating cash should divi it out. A penny dividend would transform the share price.15% yield on todays close would get us north of 10p quickly. Rant over!!

neiljoepeg
24/4/2018
17:21
The problem is that the share price is determined at the margin by joe punters and they often can act irrationally. This is the problem with a thin market and 70% in small holders hands.

Incidentally I was wondering who the 30% institutional holdings are.

In the video he also referred to Matala and said that they didn't miss it but rejected it. I know that they defintely knew about Matala.

It would seem that they are expecting to get a good deal somewhere and are going to hang out for it. I would much rather they did that than grab something more marginal just to be seen doing something.

As for Kili the target is 5800 and if they repeat Q3/18 they will be about 600ozs short. I suspect that the grade problem is mining technique and getting too much excess material in the ore, rather than a problem with the resource which is huge relative to the amunt being mined.

kimboy2
24/4/2018
16:49
shareholder7 - I suspect you might be right.
michaelfenton
Chat Pages: Latest  893  892  891  890  889  888  887  886  885  884  883  882  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock