We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Galliford Try Holdings Plc | LSE:GFRD | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BKY40Q38 | ORD 50P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-4.00 | -1.64% | 240.00 | 239.00 | 240.00 | 248.00 | 239.00 | 248.00 | 146,623 | 16:35:14 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gen Contr-single-family Home | 1.39B | 9.1M | 0.0886 | 26.98 | 245.37M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
10/11/2020 10:40 | Think all these Shorters will be running for cover now Marshall Wace LLP 0.58% 24 Sep 2020 Millennium International Management LP 0.00% 18 Sep 2020 Millennium International Management LP 0.92% 17 Sep 2020 Millennium International Management LP 0.78% 16 Sep 2020 Millennium International Management LP 0.82% 15 Sep 2020 Millennium International Management LP 0.76% 14 Sep 2020 Millennium International Management LP 0.64% 10 Sep 2020 Millennium International Management LP 0.53% 8 Sep 2020 Capital Fund Management SA 0.48% 4 Sep 2020 Capital Fund Management SA 0.57% 2 Sep 2020 | garycook | |
06/11/2020 13:08 | Yes but only if this contract is profitable the Aberdeen by pass caused a 50M loss approx I accept a chunk of this was because Carrillion went bust. | mark1000 | |
06/11/2020 10:17 | Bit of good news for a change | aquaesulis01 | |
05/11/2020 11:03 | Micos having lost over 100 million over the last two years (I am excluding the profitable house building division which of course has been moved off into Vistry) and in view of the Coronus virus no divi's declared but rest assured the directors do realise the importance of divi's to shareholders. Please note the Directors have small shareholdings coupled with a long term bonus based in part on maintaining cash balances so do not expect generous dividends as its not in their interest. | mark1000 | |
05/11/2020 10:15 | I have a note that GFRD go XD today. Have I missed a previous announcement to cancel? | micos | |
26/10/2020 12:33 | Amt remember the 2% is before central costs which are say 10M on the otherside they make 3M on their 40M of investments. I think its unlikely that they will double turnover quickly the market place is highly competitive you also have to realise CAPEX outside Government business will be cut back as a result of Covid. You also have to make the giant assumption no nasty loss making contracts that is one hell of an assumption as history shows us. I think with great respect 3.50 is pure fantasy at this time. | mark1000 | |
25/10/2020 06:24 | It doesn't sound unrealistic to hit 2 billion turnover in a couple of years time with 2% margin target that's 40 million profit. At pe of ten that's 400m or 3.50 share price. | amt | |
23/10/2020 11:43 | Susiebe Good luck with your investment short term you could make money long term the whole industry has to address the suicidal low margins otherwise its more rights issues at best and insolvencies at worse.This week GFRD were chosen as one of nine companies for road schemes for a number of eastern English Councils worth 400M. Lets hope they stay well clear of Aberdeenshire road schemes. | mark1000 | |
21/10/2020 13:35 | Sounds like they're on track to improve their margin,Im a buyer today. | susiebe | |
21/10/2020 10:23 | The bit that only partially copied reads'Pleasingly, we reinstated guidance at the Full Year Results in September' | susiebe | |
21/10/2020 10:23 | Shouldn’t have to be a 2% margin, too little room for error. That is why engineering companies are a no-no, invariably on larger projects cost over-runs occur. They need to be able to operate at a higher net margin. | bookbroker | |
21/10/2020 10:20 | Email received from company this am included this.Haven't had a listen yet.nstated guidance at the Full Year Results in September. I would suggest you listen to the webcast here https://webcast | susiebe | |
19/10/2020 17:12 | Have written to ADVFN to point out that they are reporting an incorrect Mkt Cap on this share should be 110M - 111M shares @ 73.2 p = 81/82 £ Million they are getting on to double this @ 159 M. It will be interesting to see if they ammend it accordingly. | mark1000 | |
16/10/2020 08:53 | CC2014 Currently do not hold CTO but have in the last 6 months. With regard to GFRD however I was pleased to see that they have a joint partnership with a Chinese company to build 500 flats in Leeds. This for me was positive then they go and give the directors a long term bonus target through to 2023 partly based on cash balances instead of say 100% EPS. | mark1000 | |
15/10/2020 12:26 | We are in the same place then. I have still have a contract note from 2000 showing I sold Galliford at 27.5p, having made what I thought a handsome profit at the time buying sub 20p. Not sure if it had a share split since then? I sold all my CTO in March for a decent profit having held for about 3-4 years. I missed the top by miles and miles though. I don't see how it will be spared from the construction downturn however good the mangement are. I wonder how many data centres they are actually doing and note they are about 7 years too late entering that market. Good luck with CTO | cc2014 | |
15/10/2020 11:22 | Hi Mark, I'm very familiar with NMCN and I'm not in general disagreement with your general comments. The construction sector is really tough and there's no magic way of making money as there's always a competitor as the barriers to entry are very low. I suppose I was being picky. NMCN definitely don't work on Thames Water but they do work on Severn Trent and others. It's actually one of the areas in construction where there are a few barriers to entry as you need previous expertise. This is the bit that worries me about GFRD's win in this area. OK, they have previous experience but it's not extensive. Time will tell. At the moment it's a race to the bottom on margins in this sector as the beast needs to fed. I sold all my construction stocks in Feb/Mar/Apr including NMCN. I shan't be re-entering until we hit the bottom of the cycle which seems now to me to be at least 2 years away. | cc2014 | |
15/10/2020 10:57 | CC2014 see their update release today it was work on AMP6 the wins GFRD announced were on AMP7 hence their comments about the transition from AMP6 to AMP7. Please note I am not saying they made losses on their AMP6 work but I am saying it was not as profitable as reported in their earlier accounts. The market place in this sector is highly crowded competitive dog eat dog and race to win business almost regardless of risk v margin. | mark1000 | |
15/10/2020 10:45 | hmm. I don't think they work on the Thames Water contract. They do work on a number of others. Happy to be corrected. | cc2014 | |
15/10/2020 10:39 | See NMCN share news today overstated profits by 15M their Market Cap today 18M it appears their FD could not add up proper. They are now talking about a 0.5% margin for the rest of the year blimey may be the whole of the industry has signed a suicide pact. Their losses are mainly on the Thames water contracts the predecessors to our recent wins. To invest in this sector you need balls the size of footballs and as for brains the less said about that the better. | mark1000 | |
14/10/2020 16:17 | Imatsu the 1.5% before Central costs is from the Company its real I remain gob smacked that they own up to what is a suicidal low target. I have just looked at Vistry targets 24.5% on house building and 10% on Partnerships now thats a business that you can believe in but 1.5% well that has no future once the cash mountain is spent. | mark1000 | |
14/10/2020 07:44 | The only thing I can think of with this 1% margin is that it is notional, and includes all costs they can possibly think of, including central overheads, notional future depreciation of capital assets, notional interest costs on their assets etc. Universities do something similar when it comes to (what they call) Full Economic Costing when pricing research grants. It basically presents a sob story to government and others who want to see their money being spent frugally. All a bit of a game, and all very theoretical. Because if that isn't the case, targeting a real world 1% operating margin, on a risk-based long term contract, is utterly stupid - they have no hope of making a real return. | imastu pidgitaswell | |
14/10/2020 07:22 | Initial trades suggest that the margin will be above your 1 percent so we will see. | our haven | |
14/10/2020 07:04 | Less than 1%. Any hiccup and it's making losses.....Anyone in the construction industry knows hardly any project goes smoothly and on budget. | ammu12 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions