ADVFN Logo

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for charts Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.

FUM Futura Medical Plc

40.50
1.70 (4.38%)
28 Mar 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Futura Medical Plc LSE:FUM London Ordinary Share GB0033278473 ORD 0.2P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  1.70 4.38% 40.50 39.70 40.50 40.00 39.00 39.60 359,491 16:35:16
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Pharmaceutical Preparations 0 -5.85M -0.0194 -20.62 120.28M
Futura Medical Plc is listed in the Pharmaceutical Preparations sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker FUM. The last closing price for Futura Medical was 38.80p. Over the last year, Futura Medical shares have traded in a share price range of 24.10p to 67.00p.

Futura Medical currently has 300,712,293 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Futura Medical is £120.28 million. Futura Medical has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -20.62.

Futura Medical Share Discussion Threads

Showing 16301 to 16311 of 21225 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  657  656  655  654  653  652  651  650  649  648  647  646  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
27/1/2023
19:25
The case law is consistent for a consumer to seek redress if they are misled like Petroc has been misleading in his posts all over the internet!



Assessment

Upheld

The ASA noted that the product appeared to meet the requirements of the Medical Device Directive (MDD) but understood that the MDD did not harmonise EU law relating the advertising of medical devices, which was subject to Directive 2005/29/EC on unfair business to consumer commercial practices (including advertising) generally (Unfair commercial practices directive - UCPD). That meant that advertisers must still meet the requirements of the CAP Code, which reflected the provisions of UCPD. Under the CAP and BCAP Codes, medical claims could be made for CE-marked medical devices provided they complied with other requirements of the Codes, including those relating to substantiation.

CE certification in itself does not constitute evidence for medical efficacy claims, and advertisers need to ensure that they hold evidence for such claims.

There was no statistically significant difference between the outcomes for the treatment group (patients using the Aerosure device) and the control group (using an inactive sham device). The study was accordingly not adequate evidence of the efficacy




Because the trial was not placebo-controlled, we considered AcceleDent had not provided adequate evidence to support the claim AcceleDent, is also clinically proven to reduce the pain and discomfort associated with braces and aligners by up to 71%. We concluded that the claim had not been substantiated and was misleading.

On that point the claim breached CAP Code (Edition 12) rules 3.1 (Misleading advertising), 3.7 (Substantiation) and 12.1 Medicines, medical devices, health-related products and beauty products.



Assessment

Upheld

The ASA noted that the product appeared to meet the requirements of the Medical Device Directive (MDD) but understood that the MDD did not harmonise EU law relating the advertising of medical devices, which was subject to Directive 2005/29/EC on unfair business to consumer commercial practices (including advertising) generally (Unfair commercial practices directive - UCPD). That meant that advertisers must still meet the requirements of the CAP Code, which reflected the provisions of UCPD. Under the CAP and BCAP Codes, medical claims could be made for CE-marked medical devices provided they complied with other requirements of the Codes, including those relating to substantiation.

CE certification in itself does not constitute evidence for medical efficacy claims, and advertisers need to ensure that they hold evidence for such claims.

There was no statistically significant difference between the outcomes for the treatment group (patients using the Aerosure device) and the control group (using an inactive sham device). The study was accordingly not adequate evidence of the efficacy



Med3000 was just the placebo in the FM57 study Therefore Futura had initially believed Med3000 had no therapeutic effect. The FM57 study did not set out to measure the efficacy of Med3000. The ASA will therefore consider that its reported effectiveness by Futura was a â€ËÅ“post-hoc finding’

The CAP Code required that objective claims, including medical claims for a CE-marked medical device, be backed by evidence

a certified Class IIb medical device. We understood that the device certification was granted by a body within the European Member States that had been designated to carry out conformity assessments under the Medical Device Directive

had been used as the placebo treatment in that study, and therefore the researcher had initially believed it had no therapeutic effect. The trial did not set out to measure the efficacy

its reported effectiveness by the advertiser was a post-hoc finding due to the risk of that being a false positive finding

lbo
27/1/2023
18:07
Come on, LiarBO! Bring it on, you massive loser!
petroc
27/1/2023
17:46
Funny how LiarBO has taken up his anti-FUM propaganda by using a random stranger, who nobody knows, as his new placebo hero! LiarBO is guessing that the Dutchman, who doesn't have ED, had got hold of some and has described how it affected him, partook in the HUT. LiarBO has no evidence to support that suggestion, and it's probably not true. He posted his comment on a Dutch chemist's website as a review. This is what LiarBO is telling everyone is 'documented evidence', and yet he rubbishes all the men with ED who took part in three separate trials, and over 60% all confirming that it works! These men, who were all well documented and observed, are apparently liars and don't count, whereas some stranger who posted a comment on a website after playing with Eroxon in his bedroom (a man after LiarBO's heart!) is apparently the Holy Grail of factual evidence! You couldn't make it up! Well, you could, as LiarBO has shown! The other thing is that the Dutchman confirmed that Eroxon works! He scored it 3 out of 5, whereas if it hadn't worked, he would surely have scored it zero.

Funny how LiarBO picked up on JB admitting that competitors will be copying MED3000. Of course they will! Eroxon is a brand new product, a groundbreaking treatment for ED! If LiarBO's posts had even a grain of truth in them, surely competitors would be copying all the arousal gels on the market which LiarBO pompously informs us are exactly the same as Eroxon! What a silly little lying stock basher he is!

Funny how LiarBO has nothing to say about his random Dutch stranger who says he has used Eroxon and has posted his opinion on a Dutch website. You know, the one that LiarBO calls his account of Eroxon as the only documented evidence of a real user! (Conveniently dismissing the 300 plus men with ED who took part in well documented and controlled trials, with over 60% confirming that it works. That 60% aligns with the dutchman's 3 out of 6 score - yet more proof that it works for most people).

petroc
27/1/2023
17:22
Funny how LiarBO has taken up his anti-FUM propaganda by using a random stranger, who nobody knows, as his new placebo hero! LiarBO is guessing that the Dutchman, who doesn't have ED, had got hold of some and has described how it affected him, partook in the HUT. LiarBO has no evidence to support that suggestion, and it's probably not true. He posted his comment on a Dutch chemist's website as a review. This is what LiarBO is telling everyone is 'documented evidence', and yet he rubbishes all the men with ED who took part in three separate trials, and over 60% all confirming that it works! These men, who were all well documented and observed, are apparently liars and don't count, whereas some stranger who posted a comment on a website after playing with Eroxon in his bedroom (a man after LiarBO's heart!) is apparently the Holy Grail of factual evidence! You couldn't make it up! Well, you could, as LiarBO has shown! The other thing is that the Dutchman confirmed that Eroxon works! He scored it 3 out of 5, whereas if it hadn't worked, he would surely have scored it zero.
petroc
27/1/2023
17:21
Funny how LiarBO picked up on JB admitting that competitors will be copying MED3000. Of course they will! Eroxon is a brand new product, a groundbreaking treatment for ED! If LiarBO's posts had even a grain of truth in them, surely competitors would be copying all the arousal gels on the market which LiarBO pompously informs us are exactly the same as Eroxon! What a silly little lying stock basher he is!

Funny how LiarBO has nothing to say about his random Dutch stranger who says he has used Eroxon and has posted his opinion on a Dutch website. You know, the one that LiarBO calls his account of Eroxon as the only documented evidence of a real user! (Conveniently dismissing the 300 plus men with ED who took part in well documented and controlled trials, with over 60% confirming that it works. That 60% aligns with the dutchman's 3 out of 6 score - yet more proof that it works for most people).

petroc
27/1/2023
16:53
ROFLMAO

Just confirms yet again the ramper doesn’t know what he is talking about!

Yes RCT stands for Randomized controlled trial.

FM57 was not an adequately controlled study designed to study the placebo Med3000. It was designed to study Med2005 and it failed. The post hoc findings of FM57 still does not substantiate any claims that Med3000 is having any effect beyond a placebo





Recent research has shown that the placebo effect is not only similar for medical devices to medical trials; it is considerably larger, the effect of a sham device is almost three times that of an oral placebo.

Placebo Treatment:

Don't Eat It, Rub it! indications to suggest that a topical placebo induces stronger effects than an oral one.

lbo
27/1/2023
14:31
A gel like Med3000 which is just registered as a medical device that has no active pharmaceutical ingredient ie Med3000 ‘falls in a regulatory grey zone’.

Just like arousal gels it works via increased mechanical stimulation and via sensation. And the placebo effect then of believing its works for the mans ED!



Researchers call for stricter rules on drug-like medical devices

More oversight is needed over products in the grey area between medical device and medication

Powders, tablets and gels used like medications but registered as medical devices the same category plasters and pacemakers fall into need tighter controls, a team of clinical researchers has concluded after studying several such materials. Products that fall into this regulatory grey zone dont need to prove their efficacy or safety in the same way pharmaceuticals do, which could be a concern for vulnerable patients

According to European regulations, medical devices are used for diagnosis, prevention or treatment of disease, but unlike drugs their primary mode of action isnt biological. The definition includes everything from medical software to wound dressings and surgical instruments

lbo
27/1/2023
14:25
So here is the Med3000 full patent application ingredients which are all used in other lubricants/arousal gels already. on the market. I wonder why there has been NO update on the patent!?

A placebo is ANYTHING including an arousal gel! LOL



The composition of the invention contained: ethanol: 33%; water: 35%; glycerol: 24%; propylene glycol: 6%; Carbopol® Ultrez 10: 1%. pH was adjusted to 5.25 with potassium hydroxide solution. The ethanol used in the manufacture of the composition was absolute ethanol (i.e. 100% ethanol free from water) such that the final composition contained 33% of pure ethanol. If a lower grade of ethanol was used which contained impurity amounts of water (e.g. 96% ethanol), then the amount used would have to be adjusted to ensure the final composition contained the correct amount of the components, i.e. 33% pure ethanol and 35% water.




A placebo is anything that seems to be a "real" medical treatment -- but isn't. It could be a pill, a shot, or some other type of "fake" treatment. What all placebos have in common is that they do not contain an active substance meant to affect health

lbo
27/1/2023
14:21
Mike if MED ‘works a treat’ then any arousal gel with the same ingredients will also work a treat. As it can replicate all the same effects seen in all the Med3000 tests.

What you conveniently fail to take into account is that arousal gels which are made of the same ingredients are the only real comparison to Med300 as both are medical devices. Unlike Viagra which is in a totally different class of product with proven effect in fully blinded and adequately controlled studies. Even in the deficient unblinded FM71. Med3000 was still proven to have less effect then the lowest dose of Tadalafil. And Med3000 still cannot even substantiate its having any effect beyond an arousal gel if it was the control gel in a blind efficacy comparison study.

lbo
27/1/2023
14:01
Funny how this brand new product has also the same ingredients as arousal gels already on the market! And funny how none of the men were asked to test it against those same arousal gels in blind efficacy comparison tests! LOL
lbo
27/1/2023
13:30
Funny how LiarBO picked up on JB admitting that competitors will be copying MED3000. Of course they will! Eroxon is a brand new product, a groundbreaking treatment for ED! If LiarBO's posts had even a grain of truth in them, surely competitors would be copying all the arousal gels on the market which LiarBO pompously informs us are exactly the same as Eroxon! What a silly little lying stock basher he is!

Funny how LiarBO has nothing to say about his random Dutch stranger who says he has used Eroxon and has posted his opinion on a Dutch website. You know, the one that LiarBO calls his account of Eroxon as the only documented evidence of a real user! (Conveniently dismissing the 300 plus men with ED who took part in well documented and controlled trials, with over 60% confirming that it works. That 60% aligns with the dutchman's 3 out of 6 score - yet more proof that it works for most people).

petroc
Chat Pages: Latest  657  656  655  654  653  652  651  650  649  648  647  646  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock