Fieldbury Share Discussion Threads

[outsourcer] 11/1/2010 11:44

africaneagle - you have 2 very rich friends interested in taking a large stake, really now and you are plastering that all over a BB !!!!!!!

[lord santafe] 11/1/2010 11:19

Agree africaneagle

2.1m dollars plus repayment due anyday from now of 1.5m dollars.
Thats 3.6m dollars and say another 0.7m dollars for the cost of being listed on aim. Thats $4.3m, and another thing do not forget that all future profits Fieldbury make, can be offset against the tens of millions Fieldbury lost from their old business.

[lord santafe] 11/1/2010 09:39

Another 40K buy gone through @2.4p. All you need to do is look at the last 10 trading days and you will notice there has been a large amount of buying activity.

[tivoliworldgaming] 11/1/2010 07:53

Do not forget it does cost 0.5m to get a company going on aim, so thats more value on top of the 3.9p valuation.

[outsourcer] 07/1/2010 12:47

per the interim accounts cash was 2.4M and per the last RNS it is now 2.1M, what have they spent 300K on in the last 6 months if they are effectively a cash shell ?

other than that, it looks a bit too good to be true, cash of about £1.3M plus the $1.5M due which is about £900K gives £2.2M which equates to around 3.9p a share

[soft t] 05/1/2010 17:46

anybody know how many shares owned by the directors[ just to see what makes it worthwhile to them to make something happen apart from their wages ]

[debbiegee] 05/1/2010 13:20

Not a lot of visible interest here for the 8.2% rise.
I wonder how much background interest there might be ?

[induna123] 04/1/2010 15:52

Cheers fp22. I didn't know that. So if I bought £45k worth of stock and sold at £44k I'd still have to submit a CGT form even though I only made a loss of £1k.



RNS out, payment extension till 31st March 2010.

I'm out for the time being.

[fireplace22] 04/1/2010 08:54

Induna, I was wrong it's actually 4 times the total amount received when you dispose of your assets. So if you sell more than £40,800 worth of shares in the tax year you have to complete a CGT tax form regardless of gains or losses. This is taken from the IR web site.


You also don't need to report your gains if all of the following conditions are met:

your total gains (before you deduct any losses) are equal to or lower than the annual tax-free allowance (£9,600 for 2008-09 for individuals)
your total 'disposal proceeds' - usually the amount you receive when you sell or dispose of an asset - are no more than four times the tax-free allowance (ie no more than £38,400 for individuals in 2008-09)
you're resident and domiciled in the UK (usually this means that you live here and your permanent home is here, but see the link below for more on 'residency', 'domicile' and taxes)

[fireplace22] 04/1/2010 07:53

Induna, If your deals amount to more than £30,600 per year (3 times the annual allowance in the year)you have to complete a cgt form regardless of any gains (or losses). This is my understanding. If your turnover is less than £30,600 you only fill in a form if your gains after losses are greater than £10.200.

[induna123] 04/1/2010 07:36

Sorry fireplace I don't follow. You mean you have to notify the tax office even if your down £30,000?

[fireplace22] 03/1/2010 12:27

CGT is now only 18%. And, you do have to 'work it all out' if your annual dealings are greater than three times the yearly tax allowance, even if you lose money, you have to submit a form.

[lord santafe] 03/1/2010 12:23

In those situations of being lucky enough to own a 100 bagger, the big downside is having to pay about 40% capital gains tax. The luxery of the invester who makes under the £10,200 tax limit, is they dont have the stress of working it all out.

[belson] 02/1/2010 11:18

i bought ggt and there is no consolidation
just up up up still more to come

[lord santafe] 31/12/2009 19:02

If nothing is announced on Monday, then I suggest someone should phone the company up on Tuesday. They will be allowed to say what is happening, since the information regarding the 1.5m dollars payable today, is already in the public domain.

[induna123] 31/12/2009 11:05

Solarno, I don't see any consolidation unless I've missed it. Can you provide a link to the RNS.


GGT was lingering at 0.08 up until June 2008 then it went beserk, shot up to 2p on news of the RTO.



When it changed to SRSP in Sept 2008 it stayed at 2p for a year then shot up to 8p a few months ago.

[tivoliworldgaming] 31/12/2009 09:40

No point crying over spilt milk,

[solarno lopez] 31/12/2009 09:33

did it not rise partly due to a share CONSOLIDATION thus a 100 bagger is not correct