We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ferrum Crescent | LSE:FCR | London | Ordinary Share | AU000000FCR2 | ORD NPV (DI) |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.0725 | 0.00 | 00:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
TIDMFCR
RNS Number : 0434Q
Ferrum Crescent Ltd
07 September 2017
7 September 2017
Ferrum Crescent Limited
("FCR" or the "Company")(ASX, AIM, JSE: FCR)
Lead-Zinc Drill Programme Assay Results - Toral Project, Spain
FCR, the lead-zinc exploration company, is pleased to announce the assay results from its recent 6 hole - 1,046.9 metres exploration drill programme at its wholly owned Toral Project, located in the province of Le n, Spain, which has returned a series of high-grade lead-zinc intersections. The drilling campaign was designed to determine the presence of lead-zinc in an area that is approximately three hundred metres above the deep Toral Deposit, which was historically explored by third parties, and which is the subject of a foreign estimate for the purpose of the ASX Listing Rules, comprising an NI 43-101 compliant Indicated foreign mineral resource estimate (further details of which were set out in the Company's announcement of 10 November 2016).
These new drilling results confirm lead-zinc intersections in all six holes, as previously reported from visual inspection in the Company's announcement of 28 July 2017, with significant high grade lead-zinc intersections in three of the six holes.
Highlights
-- All of the 1,046.9m drilled occurred within 200 metres of the surface. -- Intersection of lead-zinc anomalies in all six drill holes. -- Key intersections encountered (all widths given along the core): o Hole TOR17009 1 metre grading at 1.22%Pb, 9.77%Zn (10.99% combined Pb/Zn); o Hole TOR17012 3 metres grading at 0.64%Pb, 6.46%Zn (7.10% combined Pb/Zn); o Hole TOR17012 1 metre grading at 0.67%Pb, 16.10%Zn (16.77% combined Pb/Zn); o Hole TOR17013 1 metre grading at 6.51%Pb, 6.50%Zn (13.01% combined Pb/Zn); and o Hole TOR17013 3 metres grading at 6.03%Pb, 5.49%Zn (11.52% combined Pb/Zn).
Intended further exploration activities
-- Incorporate all of the new assay data into the Company's geological model so as to integrate the lead-zinc mineralisation found towards the surface of the deposit.
-- Develop and execute the second phase drilling campaign to corroborate the high grade lead-zinc results from historic drilling.
-- Aim to define a JORC (2012) compliant resource estimate based on the updated, revised geological model combined with the 44 kilometres of historic drilling performed by third parties, for relatively limited expenditure.
Drilling Programme
-- As reported in the Company's announcement of 28 July 2017, a drilling campaign of six holes drilled across various elevations was recently conducted at the Toral Project. A total of 1,046.9 metres was drilled.
-- Refer to Appendix A for further information.
Drilling results
-- Drillholes labelled TOR17009, 17012 and 17013 returned the highest assay results. The significant intercepts are set out in Appendix B.
-- Drillholes labelled TOR17008, 17010 and 17011 also intersected lead-zinc but no significant grades (above 5% combined) were detected.
-- Refer to Appendix B for further information (note that all measurements are given along the core).
Justin Tooth, Executive Chairman of FCR, said:
"These assay results, showing high-grade ore intersections of combined lead-zinc including grades above 10% within 200 metres of surface, are a most positive outcome for the Company. The assays significantly add to our earlier modelling on Toral by identifying lead-zinc mineralisation in a near-surface zone that is approximately three hundred metres above the historically explored Toral Deposit. The Toral Deposit is the subject of a foreign estimate for the purpose of the ASX Listing Rules, comprising an NI 43-101 compliant Indicated foreign mineral resource, details of which were set out in the Company's announcement of 10 November 2016. Our initial objective was to determine the presence of lead-zinc towards the surface in order to progress our new geological model; however, these strong results may open up other avenues for the project's development. The highest grade intersections (shown in the drilling results set out in Appendix B) of up to 16.1% zinc and up to 18.4% combined lead-zinc are highly supportive of our exploration programme.
"FCR will now utilise these latest results and the extensive database from the 44 kilometres of historic drilling in order to enhance its understanding of the geology of the Toral Project and refine its intended further exploration activities. This should enable the Company to work towards defining a JORC 2012 compliant resource estimate, in order to ascertain and evaluate the real potential for future mining at Toral, against the current backdrop of a strong zinc market."
Competent person's statement
The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr Juki Laurikko who is a Member of the European Federation of Geologists which is a Recognised Professional Organisation for the purposes of the 2012 JORC Code. Mr Laurikko is a Technical Consultant to the Company, and has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves'. Mr Laurikko consents to the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which they appear. Mr Laurikko has also reviewed and approved the technical information in his capacity as a qualified person under the AIM Rules.
For further information on the Company, please visit www.ferrumcrescent.com or contact:
Ferrum Crescent Limited
Justin Tooth, Executive Chairman
Grant Button, Director and Company Secretary
T: +61 8 9474 2995
UK enquiries:
Laurence Read (UK representative)
T: +44 7557 672 432
Strand Hanson Limited (Nominated Adviser)
Rory Murphy/Matthew Chandler
T: +44 (0)20 7409 3494
Beaufort Securities Limited (Broker)
Elliot Hance
T: +44 (0)20 7382 8300
Bravura Capital (Pty) Ltd (JSE Sponsor)
Melanie De Nysschen
T (direct): +27 11 459 5052
The information contained within this announcement is deemed by the Company to constitute inside information as stipulated under the Market Abuse Regulation (EU) No. 596/2014.
Appendix A: Table 1 Appendix 5A ASX Listing Rules (JORC Code)
Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data, Toral Project
Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data, Diamond Drilling, Toral Project -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Criteria Explanation Comments ---------------- ---------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Sampling techniques Nature and quality Diamond drilling of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc.). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. ---------------- ---------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Include reference to measures Spacing variable due to location taken to ensure of existing access roads and sample representivity suitable terrain. and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. ---------------- ---------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Aspects of the determination Drill hole locations were set of out with high definition GPS, mineralisation GEOMAX Zenith 35. that are Material to the Public Drill core was split in half Report. In cases and 1 metre samples, or shorter where due to lithological contacts, 'industry standard' were packed and labelled into work has been plastic bags. done this would be relatively Sample preparation was done at simple (e.g. ALS Chemex in Spain and assayed 'reverse circulation for multi-element analysis, ME drilling ICP 41 (35 element). Samples was used to with over 1% of mineralisation obtain 1 m samples were re-assayed using ME OG46. from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay'). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has
inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. ---------------- ---------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Drilling Drill type (e.g. techniques core, reverse Diamond drilling was conducted circulation, using a wireline rig, mounted open--hole hammer, on a crawler. Drill bit sizes rotary air blast, PQ and PQ3 were used and when auger, Bangka, the hole was expected to intersect sonic, etc.) mineralised zone, the core was and details recovered with a triple core (e.g. core diameter, barrel. triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-- sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc.). ---------------- ---------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Drill sample recovery Method of recording and assessing Drill core was assembled in the core and chip core boxes and the real length sample recoveries of the drill run was measured and results with measuring tape to be able assessed. to calculate the core recovery. ---------------- ---------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Measures taken to maximize Use of triple core barrel when sample recovery intersecting expected mineralised and ensure representative zones. nature of the samples. ---------------- ---------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and Not applicable at this stage whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. ---------------- ---------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Logging Whether core and chip samples have been geologically Drill logs digitally entered and geotechnically into the Company's standard templates. logged to a Logging is of sufficient quality level of detail to support Mineral resource estimation, to support appropriate however at this stage (Company's Mineral Resource first six drill holes comprising estimation, 1,046m) the lithological/alteration mining studies and mineralogical features assisting and metallurgical modelling of the Mineral Resource studies. are yet to be determined. ---------------- ---------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Whether logging is qualitative Quantitative logging of colour, or quantitative grain size, weathering, structural in nature. Core fabric, lithology, alteration (or costean, type and sulfide mineralisation channel, etc.) documented. photography ---------------- ---------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- The total length and percentage All drill holes are logged using of the relevant visual inspection. Information intersections captured on paper sheets and logged. entered into company's logging template. ---------------- ---------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Sub-- If core, whether sampling cut or sawn Mineralised zones of the core techniques and whether are split; one half core is sent and sample quarter, half for assaying and the second is preparation or all core stored in the core box as a reference. taken. ---------------- ---------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- If non--core, Not applicable as entire sample whether riffled, is core. tube sampled, rotary split, etc. and whether sampled wet or dry. ---------------- ---------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- For all sample Sample preparation was done at types, the nature, ALS Chemex in Spain, using standard quality and preparation technique suitable appropriateness for multi-element analysis, ME of the sample ICP 41 (35 element). Samples preparation with over 1% of ore grade were technique. re-assayed using ME OG46. ---------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Quality control procedures adopted Standard, blanks, field samples for all sub--sampling and repeats (using also coarse stages to maximise split and pulp reject) were inserted representivity into the sample stream. of samples. ---------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Measures taken Field duplicate (quarter core) to ensure that samples were collected at 2 in the sampling 100 samples, is representative as a rotating blank, standard, of the in situ field duplicate and repeat sequence. material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second--half sampling. ---------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Whether sample Samples are of 1 metre length sizes are appropriate or smaller (lithological contacts) to the grain or a quarter core (field sample). size of the Grain size of all samples are material being from medium to fine-grained. sampled. ---------------- ---------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Quality The nature, of quality and Assays were carried out by ALS assay appropriateness Chemex in Spain, using standard data of the assaying preparation techniques suitable and laboratory and laboratory for multi-element analysis, ME tests procedures used ICP 41 (35 element). Samples and whether with over 1% of ore grade were the technique re-assayed using ME OG46. is considered partial or total. ---------------- ---------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- For geophysical Not applicable as no geophysical tools, spectrometers, tools were used in this programme. handheld XRF instruments, etc., the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument
make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. ---------------- ---------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Nature of quality The Company uses certified reference control procedures materials (CRM) and field duplicates adopted (e.g. in its QA/QC procedures. CRMs standards, blanks, are sourced from duplicates, Labmix24 and 6 standards were external laboratory inserted every 15 samples. Field checks) and Duplicate samples were taken whether acceptable at a nominal frequency of 2 in levels of accuracy 100 samples. QA/QC also includes (i.e. lack of regularly inserted Pulp Blanks, bias) and precision 2 Coarse Blanks, 2 Pulp Repeats have been established. and 2 Coarse Repeats in every 100 samples. No samples. No samples sent yet to external laboratory. No bias has been observed and accuracy/precision is believed to be acceptable for quoting Exploration Results. ---------------- ---------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Verification The verification of sampling of significant and assaying intersections No such verification conducted by either independent in respect of this announcement. or alternative company personnel. ---------------- ---------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- The use of twinned No twinned holes. holes. ---------------- ---------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Documentation Primary data was collected using of primary data, the Company's set of standard data entry procedures, digital templates. data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols ---------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Discuss any No adjustment to assay data has adjustment to been carried out. assay data. ---------------- ---------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Location Accuracy and Drill hole locations were set of quality of surveys out with high definition GPS, data used to locate GEOMAX Zenith 35 and down-hole points drill holes deviation measures were carried (collar and out by the drilling contractor down--hole surveys), using Maxibor equipment. trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. ---------------- ---------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Specification of the grid Co--ordinates are presented in system ETRS89 Zone 29. used. ---------------- ---------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Quality and Topographic control is based adequacy of on published 1:5,000 topographic topographic sheets for the region. control. ---------------- ---------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Data Data spacing Drill hole spacing varies from spacing for reporting 30m to 60m and was selected to and of use existing access roads and distribution Exploration to test continuation of the mineralisation Results. documented in the old adits. ---------------- ---------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Whether the data spacing and The mineralized domains have distribution not yet been explored sufficiently is sufficient to demonstrate the continuity to establish of the mineralized structures the degree of to support a definition of Mineral geological and Resource. grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and ---------------- ---------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Whether sample No compositing has been applied compositing yet to the exploration results. has been applied ---------------- ---------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Orientation Whether the The orientation of the mineralised of data orientation structures has not yet been ascertained in relation of the samples and drilling has been oriented to geological achieves unbiased perpendicular to the interpreted structure sampling of structure of the mineralisation possible structures (observations from the old surface and extent to workings and adits). which this is known, considering the deposit type, ---------------- ---------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- If the relationship No orientation based sampling between the bias has been identified in the drilling orientation data at this stage. and the orientation of key mineralized structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material ---------------- ---------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Sample The measures All samples were logged and checked Security taken to ensure on return from the field. sample security. All samples were then stored in a secure building before being dispatched to the laboratory via a reputable transport company. ------------ --------------------- ----------------------------------- Audits The results of No audits or reviews have been or reviews any audits or carried out at this stage. reviews of sampling techniques and data. ------------ --------------------- -----------------------------------
Section 2: Reporting of Exploration Results, Toral Project
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary ----------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- Mineral tenement and land tenure status * Type, reference name/number, location and ownership * The Toral zinc-lead permit is located near Ponferrada including agreements or material issues with third in the west of the province of León, Autonomous parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, Community of Castile and León, Spain
overriding royalties, native title interests, approximately 400 km northwest of Madrid. historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. * The project is a licence covering 20 km(2) . * The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to * There are no known impediments to the licence obtaining a licence to operate in the area. security. ----------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- Exploration done by other parties * Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other * Between 1975 and 1985, the Adaro/Peñarroya joint parties. venture carried out exploration on the four separate licences which now correspond, approximately, to the Toral permit area. Over a period of nine years, a topographical survey, geological mapping, a hydrogeological study and more than 40,000m of diamond drilling (62 holes and 41 wedges) were carried out. * Lundin Mining S.L. (Lundin) acquired the Toral investigation permit no. 15.199 in 2007 and commenced exploration in April 2007. Lundin compiled the information collected by the previous licence holders including: o a review of the available geological maps, plans, sections and assays; o surveying old workings, old drill pads, and drill hole locations; and, a study of the existing Peñarroya/Adaro drill holes, description, photography. In addition, samples of drill core were sent to ALS Chemex in Canada in order to validate the reliability of the existing assays and exploration information was digitised. The results of Lundin's preliminary work confirmed the mineral potential of the Toral area. However, it was apparent that the continuity and the thickness of the mineralisation were insufficiently detailed. Consequently, an exploration programme was designed to add information to the data set for a better understanding of the deposit. In 2007 to 2009, seven diamond holes for a total of 4,523.7m were drilled for the purpose of confirming the continuity of the mineralisation in the San Jose area of the Toral permit and also to test the possibility of an extension of the mineralisation at depth. GoldQuest acquired Lundin, including the Toral permit, in January 2010. * During 2011 and 2012, GoldQuest conducted systematic geological mapping and soil sampling. ----------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- Geology * Deposit type, geological setting and style of * The Toral permit is located in the West Asturian mineralisation. Leonese Zone (WALZ), one of the tectonostratigraphic units in the Variscan (or Hercynian) Orogen of the north-western portion of the Iberian Peninsula. Within the WALZ, the permit area is located in the domain of the Mondoñedo Mantle. The most significant mineralisation is found in the upper carbonate layers of the Vegadeo Formation, at the contact between the Vegadeo Formation and the younger Los Cabos Series. The mineralisation comprises sulphides interbedded in limestones and dolomites, within a silicified facies, and in chloritic breccias. The mineralisation is epigenetic and formed
during a metamorphic episode within the Hercynian Orogeny. The sulphide mineral assemblage comprises sphalerite, galena, pyrite and chalcopyrite. ----------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- * Drill hole Information * A summary of all information material to the * The details of drill holes material to the understanding of the exploration results including a exploration results are reported in the body of the tabulation of the following information for all announcement and also in Appendix B below. Material drill holes: * All drill hole collar locations, easting and northing * easting and northing of the drill hole collar are given in UTM 21, ETRS89 grid, collar elevations (m), dip (deg) and azimuth (UTM), down hole length (m). * elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar * dip and azimuth of the hole * down hole length and interception depth * hole length. ----------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- * Data aggregation methods * In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging * The weighted average of the mineralised intervals was techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations calculated by multiplying the assay of each drill (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are sample by the length of each sample and dividing the usually Material and should be stated. sum of the product by the down hole length sum of the mineralised interval. * Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade * No metal equivalent values have been reported. results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. * Continuous anomaly zones reported in Appendix B are at >0.05% of combined Pb+Zn grade. * The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. ----------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- * Relationship between mineralisation widths and * These relationships are particularly important in the * As stated in the announcement, all lengths shown intercept lengths reporting of Exploration Results. including those in Appendix B are down hole measurements with true widths not known. * If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. * If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg 'down hole length, true width not known'). ----------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- * Diagrams * Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and * Please see Appendix B showing the tabulation of the tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant assay results. significant discovery being reported. These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. ----------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- * Balanced reporting * Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration * The selected drill hole results reported here are Results is not practicable, representative reporting stated as being those of the highest grades out of of both low and high grades and/or widths should be this drill programme. practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. ----------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- * Other substantive exploration data * Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, * No other substantive data has been omitted in the should be reported including (but not limited to): context of the announcement. Any material geological observations; geophysical survey results; observations arising from further data reviews will geochemical survey results; bulk samples - size and be reported in due course. method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. ----------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- * Further work * The nature and scale of planned further work (eg * Follow-up work is planned to evaluate further the tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or data from this and earlier programmes and will be large-scale step-out drilling). reported with diagrams in due course. * Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible * The next exploration programme will include further
extensions, including the main geological modelling, drilling and metallurgical work. interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. ===================================================== =============================================================== ===============================================================
Appendix B: Toral Project Drilling Results
Drill-hole information
Hole Hole Depth Dip Azimuth Grid East North RL EPM ID Type (m) ---------- ------- ------ ---- -------- ------- ---------- ----------- ------- -------- Toral TOR17008 DDR 108.5 -45 211.5 ETRS89 680958.59 4710012.46 468.44 15.199 ---------- ------- ------ ---- -------- ------- ---------- ----------- ------- -------- Toral TOR17009 DDR 235.3 -45 196.7 ETRS89 680982.73 4710058.36 456.25 15.199 ---------- ------- ------ ---- -------- ------- ---------- ----------- ------- -------- Toral TOR17010 DDR 120.0 -45 197.5 ETRS89 680936.14 4710048.76 441.60 15.199 ---------- ------- ------ ---- -------- ------- ---------- ----------- ------- -------- Toral TOR17011 DDR 83.2 -45 208.0 ETRS89 680867.59 4710054.13 416.54 15.199 ---------- ------- ------ ---- -------- ------- ---------- ----------- ------- -------- Toral TOR17012 DDR 259.0 -50 28.0 ETRS89 680716.93 4709924.96 416.54 15.199 ---------- ------- ------ ---- -------- ------- ---------- ----------- ------- -------- Toral TOR17013 DDR 240.9 -50 190.2 ETRS89 681038.30 4710093.19 458.07 15.199 ---------- ------- ------ ---- -------- ------- ---------- ----------- ------- --------
Significant Intercepts
Drillhole from to length Pb Zn Pb+Zn (m) % % % ----------- ------- ------- ------- ------ ----- ------ TOR17009 140.35 141.35 1.0 1.22 9.77 10.99 ----------- ------- ------- ------- ------ ----- ------ TOR17009 141.35 142.35 1.0 3.26 1.45 4.71 ----------- ------- ------- ------- ------ ----- ------ TOR17009 140.35 142.35 2.0 2.24 5.61 7.85 ----------- ------- ------- ------- ------ ----- ------ continuous anomaly zone TOR17009 134.35 144.35 10.0 of Pb+Zn >0.05% ----------- ------- ------- ------- --------------------- Drillhole from to length Pb Zn Pb+Zn (m) % % % ----------- ------ ------ ------- ----- ------ ------ TOR17012 176.3 177.3 1.0 0.67 16.10 16.77 ----------- ------ ------ ------- ----- ------ ------ TOR17012 177.3 178.3 1.0 0.54 1.33 1.87 ----------- ------ ------ ------- ----- ------ ------ TOR17012 178.3 179.3 1.0 0.72 1.95 2.66 ----------- ------ ------ ------- ----- ------ ------ TOR17012 176.3 179.3 3.0 0.64 6.46 7.10 ----------- ------ ------ ------- ----- ------ ------ continuous anomaly zone TOR17012 175.3 185.3 10.0 of Pb+Zn >0.05% ----------- ------ ------ ------- --------------------- Drillhole from to length Pb Zn Pb+Zn (m) % % % ----------- ------ ------ ------- ------ ----- ------ TOR17013 195.8 196.8 1.0 9.29 9.11 18.40 ----------- ------ ------ ------- ------ ----- ------ TOR17013 196.8 197.8 1.0 2.29 0.87 3.16 ----------- ------ ------ ------- ------ ----- ------ TOR17013 197.8 198.8 1.0 6.51 6.5 13.01 ----------- ------ ------ ------- ------ ----- ------ TOR17013 195.8 198.8 3.0 6.03 5.49 11.52 ----------- ------ ------ ------- ------ ----- ------ continuous anomaly zone TOR17013 193.8 199.8 6.0 of Pb+Zn >0.05% ----------- ------ ------ ------- ---------------------
This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
END
DRLFMGGLRVNGNZM
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
September 07, 2017 02:00 ET (06:00 GMT)
1 Year Ferrum Crescent Chart |
1 Month Ferrum Crescent Chart |
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions