We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eqtec Plc | LSE:EQT | London | Ordinary Share | IE000955MAJ1 | ORD EUR0.01 (CDI) |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-0.01 | -0.43% | 2.34 | 2.20 | 2.30 | 2.35 | 2.25 | 2.35 | 1,521,135 | 16:35:04 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Electric Services | 7.97M | -10.53M | -0.0712 | -0.32 | 3.33M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
12/9/2020 18:26 | I believe that EQT could just as easily produce hydrogen by adding another process into the system. Perhaps haven't done that yet as they haven't needed to. Demand is there for the gasifier in its standard cost effective form. Vetnabrekk. No problem with discussing PHE on here. I believe I raised the question and Scrutable challenged your response. Its just discussion not promotion of alternatives. | rogerramjett | |
11/9/2020 16:47 | I did say "projections" scrutable, not actuals. I know that they haven't produced any hydrogen yet that's why the DMG unit that's planned for Protos is called "First of a Kind" (FOAK). I don't peddle fiction. And PHE have not been involved with plasma technology as far as I'm aware, but I'm happy to be corrected on that if you can show me the evidence. | vatnabrekk | |
11/9/2020 15:26 | vatnabrekk11 Sep '20 - 10:08 - 2459 "All of the PHE projections have shown a very healthy profit from each DMG unit....." No they havn't. That's pure fiction. The company has produced and sold not one £'s worth of hydrogen or electricity in 20 years of trying with one test rig after the other. They have all burnt out under the fierce temperature of the plasma. Yet PHE always write in the present tense of what they can do. That's a repeated lie. Let's see what their prototype machine can actually do when it finally emerges from "never,never" land. It doesn't even exist except as a drawing. | scrutable | |
11/9/2020 13:35 | 0.45 is the level. | hodhasharon | |
11/9/2020 12:40 | The EQT clock was restarted when DP took over. It took until March to clean up much of the mess at which point the management issued 15% options to themselves at a significant premium to the then price. EQT therefore have a much shorter lifespan as a viable commercial company, which I personally date from 31st of March 2020, with the later big placing to recapitalise the company, the signal that proper investors were on board following the final exit of the old tired European holders who had been selling down relentlessly. “The future is bright” But start your clock from 1st of April, a much shorter time period than has been the case with PHE. | davidblack | |
11/9/2020 12:13 | vatnabrekk, appreciate your response as part of the discussion. So, where does the disparity lie between PHE and EQT ? It still doesn't make sense. Is it Peel becoming the developer ? does this just not mean that PHE are likely to receive less from installing their equipment than EQT who are on some projects, the developer, owner and operator, with a fully financed project option ? | rogerramjett | |
11/9/2020 09:55 | Agree - this is a share that always has an issue hanging over it. I see almost free fall soon. If Greece can't lift it, then I don't know what will. No trust here. | paul8515 | |
11/9/2020 09:08 | All of the PHE projections have shown a very healthy profit from each DMG unit, especially when they produce hydrogen rather than just all electricity. I'm not going to try to quote figures here because I can't remember off the top of my head, but there are lots of projections in the public domain, some produced by W2T and some by brokers. PHE and W2T had difficulty raising funding for the first commercial unit, probably because it is " first of a kind" and the technology has not yet been proven at commercial level. So potential funders didn't have the confidence to lend at this stage, but now that Peel are taking over the roll of "developer" and stated their intention to install DMG units on 11 of their sites in a few years, it is expected that funding the first unit will be much easier than previously. PS: I'm not promoting anything here, just answering a question to the best of my ability! | vatnabrekk | |
11/9/2020 08:55 | Why would you set buy orders in something as volatile as aim? Bit of an amateur move? | paul8515 | |
11/9/2020 08:42 | Not running PHE down as I don't know their model but I suspect that at the moment it is very much behind the commercial reward of EQT model. Could be wrong, just discussing and interested. | rogerramjett | |
11/9/2020 08:42 | 0.45 is the level. Set your buy orders now. | hodhasharon | |
11/9/2020 08:40 | In comparion to EQT and for example SAE who have viable project options which will generate revenue and profit. Lenders are happy to lend. | rogerramjett | |
11/9/2020 08:39 | But if the projects are not 'commercially viable' at present, and I am not saying that is the case for Peel and PHE projects, how will anyone fund them if they are not profitable ? | rogerramjett | |
11/9/2020 08:33 | In addition to the licence fees of £500k per unit, PHE may take shares in some of the SPVs in the future, if they can provide the funding required for such investment. I imagine they will wait until the first two or three units are built and commissioned by Peel before they do that. This hasn't been stated as a clear strategy, but their CEO has mentioned in the past that they might be looking for a corner-stone investment in the future, so taking part in SPVs in the future would be an obvious route. In the meantime though, the focus is on the first unit towards the end of this year and hopefully to be commissioned early next year, then we'll see where it goes from there. | vatnabrekk | |
11/9/2020 08:29 | EQT vrs PHE share price?? I agree something strange as to why EQT has not performed and insiders know why. Is there a major issue with Claim OR the Deals involved bribes...there is Never smoke without fire , is this a fire sale...you decide...Selling still happening...i am watching and waiting... | halfpenny | |
11/9/2020 07:52 | how does PHE generate enduring revenue ? Do they also have options to own and operate ? Or are they simply looking to licence the tech and manufacture and sell ? EQT are looking at a pipeline of circa 30 projects of which a number will provide revenue for years after the installation. A big backer is not always the answer? There is no reason why EQT cannot do this on their own using project finance and the capital raised to fund projects to financial close. That money spent is returned at that juncture plus 100%, so £10m would go a long way if you are getting most back plus 100% before project construction funded by finance. | rogerramjett | |
11/9/2020 07:46 | So according to the share price The Greece deal has added nothing to the value of the company. Something is holding us back and it isn't the Aries noise. They've done it before, there's something else going on the the insiders know about and are taking to the lifeboats. I feel it in my water. | paul8515 | |
11/9/2020 07:34 | It is still discounting US and maybe more to come. PHE and ITM have big backers, EQT has none . The patent problem could overshadow this for months so punters looking elsewhere | juju44 | |
11/9/2020 07:33 | Perhaps it's because PHE has a different business model, for the first DMG unit anyway. PHE are not providing any of the capital expenditure for the unit (that is being provided by Peel) but receive a licence fee of £500k per annum for each gasification unit built by Peel. | vatnabrekk | |
11/9/2020 07:22 | Is it because PHE produce hydrogen from waste and not gas ? Hydrogen is just a store of energy but obviously clean when burned to produce energy. Alternatively a fuel cell would be more efficient but currently the whole process must be expensive in comparison the EQT gasification and power generation. Admitted, the gasification process and subsequent energy generation will still produce carbon emmisions but it is significantly cleaner than incineration and also commericially viable. Fairly sure that any gas produced by QT could be scrubbed resulting in hydrogen anyway. So the question stands. Why the disparity when EQT clearly have a commercial business model and defined strategy, have projects popping up everywhere and have working systems in operation. Doesnt make much sense to me. What is the market waiting for ? It has discounted the US for the time being so what is it now ? | rogerramjett | |
11/9/2020 07:17 | Well spotted. Small matter of the decimal point .... ! | stevea171 | |
11/9/2020 07:08 | If only eqt shares were 57p rather than 0.57p. From your pen to the MM's bid offer spread.. | mikepotash | |
11/9/2020 07:03 | EQTEC - Advanced gasification technology company. Way ahead of the opposition in technology and company development but not in market recognition or price. Technology that is not just on the drawing board but actually in use in projects in Spain, Italy, Bulgaria, Croatia and Poland. Over subscribed Capital raising of £10 million in July. In first half of the year had 10 new commercial enquiries with potential to yield up to £120 million in sales. EQTEC plc (EQT). Sp: 0.57p. Mkt Cap: £39 million Sales 2020: £7 million Profit 2020: -£0.9 million Sales 2021: £38.5 million Profit 2021: £5.7 million Sales 2022: £66 million Profit 2022: £11 million Power House Energy (PHE). Sp: 3.5p. Mkt Cap: £124 million Sales 2020: Not Material Profit 2021: Sales 2021: Not Material Profit 2021: 9/9/2020. Powerhouse Energy Group PLC (LON:PHE) has raised £5 million through an oversubscribed placing and subscription that it said will provide the necessary cash resources to reach profitability and implement its wider international growth strategy. The company, which specialises in technology that generates hydrogen from waste plastic, said it raised the funds through the issue of 160 mln new shares at a price of 2.5p each, a 16.7% discount to its closing price on Tuesday. The company said it will use the funds to refine technical aspects and assist Peel to deliver the first commercial-scale installation of its DMG technology, which can utilise waste plastic, end-of-life-tyres, and other waste streams to efficiently and economically convert them into syngas from which valuable products such as chemical precursors, hydrogen, electricity and other industrial products may be derived. The technology is to be deployed at the Protos site, a Peel energy park near Ellesmere Port in England. ITM Power (ITM). Sp: 264p. Mkt Cap: £1260 million. Sales 2020: £3.7 milliom Profit 2020: -£18.5 million Sales 2021: £16.2 million Profit 2021: -£13 million Sales 2022: £36.4 million Profit 2022: -£9.5 million | stevea171 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions