Eicom Share Discussion Threads

[gearing9] 20/2/2008 22:46

Why not take a civil action suit out against EICOM and timmins....????

[temporary] 20/2/2008 18:58

I presume you mean genuine shareholders unlike yourself Legal Aid?

Still waiting for your proof.

No doubt I will have to wait forever.

If you have this proof why have you not gone to the police like Jbat said?

From now on Legal Aid whenever I see your name on these boards I will hear the late great Freddie Mercury singing your theme song "The Great Pretender".

[temporary] 20/2/2008 17:16

Hi Jbat

I was replying to your comments "Eicom management may well be bent".

Given the vitriol of Legal Aid and all the allegations he has made against the company do you not think he would have gone down the Option 1 route if he had a shred of evidence?

As far as Option 2 is concerned I didn't think being incompetent was actually something the FSA could do much about.

Oh, and just for the record I am not spitfire3. I would have thought the posting style (or lack thereof) would show that to be the case.

The challenge still stands to Legal Aid.

Show us the proof. Put up or shut up.

[temporary] 20/2/2008 15:08

Jbat

My point is that there is a huge difference between unlucky, incompetent and dishonest.

If anyone has proof of dishonesty then they should post it. But they don't, they post opinion as fact (particularly in the case of one person).

I agree this has been, as you so eloquently put it, "a ballcrushing loss of funds". I have lost almost 97% of the money I invested in the shares. Thankfully I knew it was a high risk stock and continue to hold the shares in the hope that I can sell them at some point to offset capital gains made elsewhere.

[spitfire3] 20/2/2008 10:34

my point is the apologists and loyal ...paid shareholders had a pop at me for years....but i am right....its a bent doggy....

[jbat] 20/2/2008 10:27

Spitfire - your point is what, exactly?

[temporary] 20/2/2008 07:26

So Legal Aid

One of your accusations is that the company stole employees pension contributions?

That should be a nice easy case for the police to prove. Have you reported this to the police? When? What action have they taken?

This seems to be the only specific, concrete allegation you have made against the company. This would lead me to assume you are an ex employee. This would make sense. You have no shares in the company. You rant on these boards and yet don't produce proof. The only conclusion I can draw is you cannot produce your proof because it would show you are a former employee who was involved in the whole sorry mess.

Oh, and just for the benefit of the hard of thinking:

I am not Fowler or Timmins

[spitfire3] 19/2/2008 22:21

Jbat - 19 Feb'08 - 11:03 - 11896 of 11897


This thread ought to be nominated for 'Most inflammatory and potentially libellous publication 2008'!




and i have not posted on here for ages........

[crossbeam] 19/2/2008 14:21

Jbat,

I agree. It has all taken a turn for the worst........

[jbat] 19/2/2008 11:03

This thread ought to be nominated for 'Most inflammatory and potentially libellous publication 2008'!

[temporary] 18/2/2008 12:20

Legal Aid

You clearly think I am part of Eicom. I am not. Please refrain from making such accusations. Oh sorry, I forgot that is what you do here, post your opinion as fact and then try to hide by not calling the directors by their real names.

I am not Timmins or Fowler.

Yet again I ask you Legal Aid, why are you so interested in this company? Are you a shareholder? Are you a supplier who didn't get paid? Are you a former employee?

Legal Aid I really would like to engage you in a battle of wits but it is against my principals to attack an unarmed person.

Oh and substantial wealth no I don't plan to buy any more. The last lot were bought at 3p pre the 1 for 10.

[substantial wealth] 18/2/2008 11:35

Buying anymore temporary?

[temporary] 16/2/2008 20:04

Hi Jettyboy

Like you my investment is near worthless. I have a few thousand shares. Enough to pay the dealing costs and buy myself lunch!

The difference is I chalk it up to experience and "walk away".

Legal Aid doesn't seem to have any shares and yet he/she comes on here and rants all the time. His/her rants grow increasingly hysterical but obviously has no proof.

In order to disguise this fact Legal Aid does not call the directors by their real names. You need to ask what is he/she scared of?

So come on Legal Aid tell us what PROOF you have. Spell it out and call the directors by their real names. If you are right and have proof you have nothing to fear!

Or will you just hide behind the anonymity of this bulletin board and continue to post your hysterical rants when you don't even own any shares?

[jettyboy] 15/2/2008 14:49

Temporary
how many do you hold - 225333 or 157436?

i am left holding 1959 - worth less than 1% of my original investment.

i was sucked in many years ago by the belief that the chess deal
was going to be a company maker.

i would of offloaded a long time ago but for the fact it would cost me more to sell than they are worth.

so tell me Temporary - do you believe that there is any value to this company??