Deltex Medical Share Discussion Threads

[gbenson1] 21/4/2017 04:31

The done deal relates to the 22 Mar RNS, the shares had already been allocated to BOD and to pay service providers, it was a RNS done deal, not a prospectus, the share were added to the stock exchange on or about the 27 Mar, why delay the result due on or about the 14th April? Its not very professional and could be seen as a delaying tactic. Not quite sure what for, all will be made public (maybe) on the 27 Apr. I'm a long term shareholder here and this doesn't give me any confidence in the way in which the company is organised/run. Fingers crossed!

[bigt20] 21/4/2017 02:30

Results summary was released last year on the 12th April 2016 so to release it this year on the 27th April is not much of a delay.

[buywell3] 21/4/2017 00:23

Mr Benson or any other in the know


what are the ''done deal'' fundraising details ?

[bigt20] 20/4/2017 15:57

gavapentin20 Apr '17 - 15:03 - 8681 of 8687 0 0
TC

I am away cycling on that date I am afraid.

---> Gav has seen that report today about cycling being good for your health....what they dont say is the increased risk of being flattend by a truck or car drivers not paying attention!

Enjoy!

[gbenson1] 20/4/2017 15:35

BigT20, I have issues with the delay due to the done deal with the fundraising, it was already in the bag, why delay the results? I do get a little nervous when they delay for a 2nd time albeit a few days, I'm optimistic it's for positive reasons but conscious it could be bad news, I just wish management would be open and honest in their communications.

[gbenson1] 20/4/2017 15:18

Hi BigT20, unfortunately I don't live in the UK but I'm watching developments closely. I feel / get the impression that management have done a good sell and it's all jam tomorrow (maybe)! The 10 year share chart doesn't make good reading, we need to reach a bottom wherever that might be!

[bigt20] 20/4/2017 15:09

AGM - usually early May ?

21 days notice --> mid April

[gbenson1] 20/4/2017 15:08

Arf Dysg it's a little unclear if somewhat ambiguous? But it's there in Black n White, and I'm a Mackem.

[bigt20] 20/4/2017 15:08

gbenson1,

Thanks for that reply.

Initial delay due to fundraising? Alternatively it could be to allow more time for something to happen?


Second delay of a few days - I wouldn't get too fussed about this one as its only a few days and sometimes when dealing with sign offs etc. it can take a bit longer than expected.


Are you planning to go to the AGM?

[arf dysg] 20/4/2017 15:04

gbenson1, what was the results date intended to be before it was delayed?

[gavapentin] 20/4/2017 15:03

TC

Very kind invite.
I am away cycling on that date I am afraid.
I'm sorry I cannot assist but will remember your kind offer.

Good luck with your investment.

GP

[gbenson1] 20/4/2017 14:58

BigT20, 1st delay was mentioned in 22 Mar - Share Issues RNS, under Issue of Results.

[bigt20] 20/4/2017 14:45

Gbenson (post 8678),
--------------------
When was the first delay announced?




Open day - starting time
----------------------------------
Good idea to have an open day.
When it comes to the starting time its a pity they do not consider those of us who have to travel some distance. I am not staying overnight like I did last time

[gbenson1] 20/4/2017 14:29

I'm a long term investor here, this is the second delay in publishing the results for very flimsy reasoning, is there some good news in the pipeline, or is it damage limitation?

[the count] 20/4/2017 13:31

--->GAVAPENTIN

I have attended open days at Chichester a few times before, but this time I am not fully decided whether to turn up or not.

You have always presented the 'skeptics' side of the story here (putting it mildly), often getting into heated arguments with posters. I would really be up for attending the open day this time to witness a skeptic such as yourself (with your added medical knowledge as a medical practitioner) take on the management in raising some of the Q's and doubts you have had on here and challenging the management who obviously have their side of the story. For me as a long term investor, that would be more rewarding than any presentation along with Q's posed by medical novices in the main.

I have often challenged their medical claims and results of various clinical trials but often, I do not feel medically knowledgeable enough to go into greater depth.

I would gladly treat you to lunch afterwards if you take up this offer. It will have been well worth it.

What say you Gavapentin? Who knows, it could be a very productive meeting.

Regards and living in hope,

THE COUNT!

[bigt20] 19/4/2017 16:26

Gavs probably thinking of his retirement date!

[ramnik007] 19/4/2017 13:55

Hopefully not that long

[gbenson1] 13/4/2017 13:02

A few nice small buys ahead of the results, part of the problem is I imagine there are a few distressed holders who will sell into any price increase. Hold your nerve until at least 24/4.

[bigt20] 12/4/2017 16:17

Well they need something to go with the results....

[gbenson1] 11/4/2017 17:52

Yes chrisdgb I was wondering that myself, can't understand why they delayed the results, the 400k was in the bag, no real need to delay. I suppose all will be revealed, my thoughts are they'll publish any new contract win(s) separate from the results imho.

[bigt20] 11/4/2017 13:35

chrisdgb,

If you are expecting an RNS relating to new news e.g., new account, I think you will have to wait for the RNS associated with the results.

[chrisdgb] 11/4/2017 08:32

Seems a long time to wait for the results from the subscription, twiddle my thumbs....

[bigt20] 03/4/2017 06:57

gbenson,

I suspect that L&G TR-1 from March 2016 only related to part of the L&G total holdings. If you look at some of these L&G related RNS's you will see various L&G related names used. Might be worth looking to see if the TR-1 only relates to one of the L&G names.

Just to give you some more info re L&G holdings:
RNS dated 12/6/15 16,156,566
RNS dated 28/3/17 14,418,386



BTW. some of these institutional holders (not necessarily L&G) hold shares for a various other organisations such as pension funds and not necessarily for their own beneficial interest. So it my be the trustees of the underlying organisations that cause holdings to change.


I hope the above helps.