Cozart Share Discussion Threads

[jimmyloser] 18/1/2007 18:47

Wishful thinking I'm afraid.

It depends on the results of course, in this case all indicators are positive, the share price twitches on a mere 10k trade.

The board said they have started well

They have arranged a meeting on the afternoon of the results with analysts and this meeting also includes the head honcho from Philips who is working on this project with them, he could of course be explaining delays, but he could be delivering some long awaited news.

We could have news of a USA distributor

and, we could have a steady as she goes message.

I actually think, we could see the share price blow straight through the 45pence barrier

Could, Would and Think, will all be history by 7.05am on the 25th

imo/dyor

[keyno] 17/1/2007 08:13

Do you have any reason for mentioning a 200K+ trade jimmyloser or is it just wishful thinking?

What do you think will happen after results?

[jimmyloser] 16/1/2007 21:08

I'm feeling optimistic for 40p offer ahead of results, this moves on light trading, just have to imagine what an order for 200k+ would do right now!!

[milner2] 16/1/2007 16:51

Still a nice steady rise showing indicated that PI,s are taking a small punt, also must presume that the outcome of the results/presentation due for release on 25th Jan haven't been leaked yet, as i would have expected to see more action either way price wise.
Cheers.

[qut] 10/1/2007 23:31

UP what jimmy??

[nornek] 08/1/2007 16:20

hard to get the stock placed an order this morning only could fill 100k so far @33.5p

[milner2] 08/1/2007 11:52

Took another 7500 today, hoping to see new highs reached before results/presentations on 25th Jan.
Cheers...

[jimmyloser] 08/1/2007 11:47

As I mentioned...the share price will do the talking!

UP

[qut] 05/1/2007 17:59

Happy New Year jimmy! Are your sources here the same as your ones at MDY?!

[jimmyloser] 05/1/2007 07:50

WengerB

I agree wholeheartedly with you, one summises that they just would not bring Phlips head of the department in front of analysts if it was to deliver bad news, they could do that themselves in a much lower key way.

The share price will tell us whats happening no doubt.

[wengerb] 05/1/2007 07:25

Put simply, without the success of the Philips/Cozart joint development project Cozart has the prospect of a reasonably optimistic future. However, with the success of the JDP, Cozart may have the prospect of dramatic progress. A successful JDP might well lead to a further investment in Cozart by Philips, even to an eventual takeover. The JDV was announced at the beginning of 2006 and was to run for 18-months.

I take it as a positive sign that the R&D update on 25th. January will focus on the JDP and will feature the boss of the Philips division working with Cozart.

Generally, after 70% of the development time of a JDP has elapsed, you know whether you're going to have a success or not.

[gombie] 04/1/2007 21:44

Thanks jimmyloser.

[jimmyloser] 04/1/2007 21:14

Have spoken to my sources, they advise that all is well, see the bid rebound to 32p?

[gombie] 04/1/2007 14:49

Thanks WengerB. Point taken.

[wengerb] 04/1/2007 14:04

Just over £50,000 worth of trades doesn't mean that anything's "going on".

Maybe someone wanted to buy a new car?

[gombie] 04/1/2007 13:49

All sells. What's going on?

[gombie] 28/12/2006 22:54

WengerB much appreciated,thank you.

[broadwood] 28/12/2006 17:08

wenger - Thanks, interesting.

[goldent] 05/12/2006 18:41

Drop seems a bit over done today. Could we see a bounce tomorrow.

[keyno] 17/11/2006 13:21

Thank you for your answer cfb2.

[cfb2] 17/11/2006 13:02

Keyno: A T trade is merely a transaction being reported on completion due to it's size being significantly larger than the NMS for that share. I'm not aware of any inference from the trade type as to whether it resulted from a spreadbet.

CFB

[keyno] 17/11/2006 11:55

Any comments about the late T trade that went through yesterday at closing time for 50,000 @ 37p? Am I right in thinking that indicates shorting? Or am I being pessimistic?
Thanks.

[jimmyloser] 16/11/2006 23:26

Interesting.