Conroy Gold & Natural Re... Share Discussion Threads

[4marlin] 04/8/2017 11:12

....and that just about sums it up, imo.

[catswhiskas] 04/8/2017 10:07

The price will fall 50% today if Conroy wins !

[resourceful] 04/8/2017 09:54

the price will fall up to 50% over time

[paleje] 04/8/2017 08:39

Surely the evidence of what the old board have done (or not) is enough to condemn them. I agree the new guys haven't said much but 2 of them have a lot of experience deal making in sector and the third good business acumen.

My concern would be if the 2 pull out having achieved what they set out to do. We'll see.

[kevjones2] 04/8/2017 08:26

Who said there was any evidence as to what the new bod proposes? What new bod?

[shambaby] 03/8/2017 17:56

Where's this evidence Kev to what the new board propose

[kevjones2] 03/8/2017 16:41

I think there's a bit of Stockholm Syndrome going on. Certain people are incapable of changing their minds despite overwhelming evidence that that would be the best thing to do. Also, as can be seen from some of the lying around here, a complete inability to admit making a mistake. Oh well.

[kevjones2] 03/8/2017 13:51

I see the Phoenix magazine has an in-depth look at the CGNR revolution. I think the article is titled "The Battle for Conroy Gold". It's behind a paywall, unfortunately.

[kevjones2] 03/8/2017 11:23

Sorry for posting this but it's funny. And don't worry, it won't be a saga of posts because Thecynical has me filtered (unless he's lying again). Here he is patronising other posters on this bod when MTR invested. He was so utterly clueless he didn't know MTR is Metal Tiger - he thought, in his usual completely unresearched way that another company - Tiger Finance - had invested:

""where was the Tiger share price in 2010?? How long was it flatlining? facts, man...those are what count, not your take on things...really, seriously off the wall..."

LOL. Here's part of the reply I gave him:

"Obnoxious? Patronising? Arrogant? Pompous? All of them, methinks.

Well thecynical1, here's a fact for you: Metal Tiger was founded in 2014 so the answer to your question asking where its share price was in 2010 is this: in order to have a share price a company must first actually exist."

Good unintended entertainment from thecynical.

[kevjones2] 03/8/2017 11:00

thecynical,you're an unresearched liar. Everyone knows it. You didn't filter me either - thats just another lie. I noted yet another unresearched post you made on the AEX bb yesterday. Enbarrassing. I know you go from bb to bb making snide and always negative comments about companies you have no clue about so carry on. Btw, I doubt if even those I disagree with most would put you anyway near my intellectual capability - and I'm only bright. LOL.

[4marlin] 02/8/2017 22:09

It is my understanding that there are serious players who would deal with CGNR if management was different.
Here´s hoping that the rebels prevail and the company starts to realise its potential!!

[thecynical1] 02/8/2017 21:52

Kev - I took you off filter a few days ago. Having just read your mindless post, I will now put you back on filter. Life is too short to listen to people like yourself who apparently have the intellectual capacity of a boiled egg.

[kevjones2] 02/8/2017 19:25

TheCynical, leaving aside the utter fool you made of yourself when you raged over Tiger Finance investing in CGNR when it was actually Metal Tiger, do you know anything about business? I mean anything at all?

Every single share on earth has a price someone is willing to pay. Your stupid assertion that nobody will buy the share means the share price is set to stay at today's exact price forever. No buyers, no sellers. In the next breadth you say if a big seller tries to sell the mms will have a field day. How? By selling at very low prices. Who will they sell those shares to? BUYERS!

[resourceful] 02/8/2017 16:57

the proxies are in now
the board knows the result

[thecynical1] 02/8/2017 13:13

Who do you think is going to buy the shares? If any large holders even try to sell, the MMs will have a field day. Jmo.

[kevjones2] 02/8/2017 13:07

If the bod stays the same I will await a spike on his 'I-got-a-kick-in-the-backside-so-here's-the-new-superduper-plan' nonsense RNS. Then I'll sell. It's easier for me wait for the spike as I'm losing so much it doesn't really matter. If I was a relatively new buyer I'd not be prepared to take the risk on a spike at all and sell up within minutes of the unchanged bod announcement.

[thecynical1] 02/8/2017 11:30

Why would anyone believe any time frame that they may refer to?

[resourceful] 02/8/2017 10:06

agree with kaos
conroy wins

[kaos3] 02/8/2017 09:57

SP action clearly says to me that all interested parties know the voting result.

[goldeneye5] 01/8/2017 23:55

I wonder we're a lot of chickens counted here a little early!

[goldeneye5] 01/8/2017 23:22

I believe Affidavit apparently made a number of allegations about executive pay that were totally false.Affidavit referenced MTR holding as only 2.7%, however holdings RNS only today....possible breach of AIM rulesFiasco simply provided Conroy an opportunity to rebut and set a number of things straight on the record.