ADVFN Logo

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

CTFA Cientifica

0.95
0.00 (0.00%)
28 Mar 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Cientifica LSE:CTFA London Ordinary Share GB00B4YSYV64 ORD 0.5P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 0.95 - 0.00 00:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

Cientifica Share Discussion Threads

Showing 226 to 237 of 425 messages
Chat Pages: 17  16  15  14  13  12  11  10  9  8  7  6  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
18/1/2014
11:46
Perhaps u didn't read the last RNS about potential tie up. Im stuck here from the Avia days until 6p then i might sell. I just resent non holders coming on here with their personal grudges against one director. I take your points but perhaps set up a new ctfa thread to make them aka txo please?
knigel
18/1/2014
09:36
Well unlike TXO the CTFA share price is quite chipper with 99% of investors focusing on the growth potential of graphene while 1% focus on one of several directors!!!
knigel
18/1/2014
09:32
Thanks for the dissuasion on scrotums, scatology and online identities, it was most amusing but hardly relevant here, unless you are cross posting from another kinky BB. Anyway it's Slobberchops-san to you.

I don't know whether you are all Tim's dumped lovers, a lone schizophrenic in a Brighton bedsit typing in his underwear, a secret society or a three in a bed scandal waiting to happen but you don't seem to know or care much about technology investing or even what graphene is?

So come on Drunky, step up with your dodgy dossier, discuss something relevant to this stock or shut up and ship out.

slobberchops
16/1/2014
06:15
Thanks very much for the info. I have been done a few times with dodgy SIM companies so will stay well clear. It's just not worth the risk.
a.fewbob
15/1/2014
20:13
Who is Tim Baldwin? Is he a director of CTFA?
a.fewbob
15/1/2014
00:04
At least he's stopped posting as "Graphene Investor" - that was just embarrassing.

Pretty obvious that TXO is in its final stages, so I'd expect the attention paid to this POS to increase. We all know the script.

yarsan
14/1/2014
23:02
expect more b.s. and pumping here because TB is out and about talking to the usual muppet promoter websites
stockologist
14/1/2014
18:11
Thanks for the concise summary Yarsan, newvest would be proud of you.

There was an element of doubt over Tim Harper. Maybe he did not know what a flop Tim Baldwin was, maybe he did have some real connections which might lead to real opportunities. The link up with Voller dispels all those doubts - Harper has demonstrated he is a clueless chancer, who is happy to be used by TB in one of his schemes to get himself paid more fees.

ih_318421
13/1/2014
17:54
It won't tank, it will just drift lower as nothing of real substance happens. The link up with London Graphene will demonstrate to real investors that this company really does not have the first idea what it is doing in the graphene area.
ih_318421
13/1/2014
15:33
your so right
ive just sold all mine
well done
serial deramper you
check his posts

oldvic
12/1/2014
17:22
Two of my interests, Big Data and Nanotechnology seems to be colliding this week and that's a bad sign? Why? Well nanotechnology is seen as a Deus Ex Machina that performs the magic step that enables or justifies other technologies, which usually means that someone hasn't got much of a clue how to get to their imagined version of the future. As an alternative to throwing in some magic, or it all being a dream we now have a new tool to replace random acts of god, nanotechnology.

First came a mention in the early stages of Eric Schmidt's book 'The New Digital Age' where the authors allege that nanotechnology machines in your bloodstream will apparently send back data to your doctor, although what kind of nanotech or how it may work isn't allowed to get in the way of the big idea. I'm a quarter the way through and while there are some interesting ideas, the overall tone of the book of "Wow, the future will be really cool and enabled by all kinds of data" is beginning to annoy the cr*p out of me. If it was presented to me by one of my students I'd tell them to go back and show the working, so I could figure out how they'd got from now to the future. It has all the unfortunate hallmarks of being written by a a bunch of people with no interest in anything outside IT, and even less understanding of the real technological world. I'm with the New York Times on this one, it's both fascinating and facile.

The theme is repeated byAdrian Asher, chief information security officer (CISO) of the Skype division at Microsoft who claims in an article headed "Big data will go mainstream when nanotechnology is embedded into humans, says Skype CISO" perhaps after reading Schmidt's book...

"There is much talk about networking and e-commerce uses for big data in the future but imagine in five or 10 years, if each of us had nanotechnology embedded in us to help fight various forms of diseases.

"Once those markers are present [of a disease], they will be detected and fed into your house's gateway and then will be processed into the healthcare system. Being able to do that with animals and humans – that is when you're really embracing big data."

It would be more interesting see what nanotechnologists think of the impact of big data on their field.


Share this:

leebong
12/1/2014
17:12
"It's a bit silly for society to throw a little bit of money at (graphene) and expect it to change the world"
Posted in: Uncategorized|July 22, 2013No Comments
A nice quote by Sir Andre Geim, Nobel Prize winning co-discoverer of graphene in this morning's Times headlined "Twitter is no substitute for proper science, laments Nobel laureate."

However, Sir Andre said that he had been "bemused" by the clamour to exploit graphene. "I'm not interested in going into industry or property development or creating 'graphene valley' as the Government would like me to," he said of his lack of involvement with a £61 million Graphene Institute, due to open at the University of Manchester in 2015. "It's a bit silly for society to throw a little bit of money at something and expect it to change the world. Everything takes time."

As we finalise the Graphene Opportunity Report the phrase ""It's a bit silly for society to throw a little bit of money at something and expect it to change the world. Everything takes time." rings true. While graphene has huge potential, much of that will not be realised in the coming decade. Indeed our research is showing that many of the applications widely linked with graphene ail be difficult to address through a combination of technical and competitive issues, while a number of potentially large markets are being underserved by current producers.

leebong
Chat Pages: 17  16  15  14  13  12  11  10  9  8  7  6  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock