Cic Gold Grp Share Discussion Threads

[goulding1215] 07/4/2017 17:40

I never substantiate my posts! Look who is talking! You make bland statements all the time. The first thing that comes out of your head. Go through your stupid posts? I have a life to lead rather than read your boring litanies. It is Friday night. Beer night.

[sparty1] 07/4/2017 14:22

whatever...hopefully he will make some nice buddies in there anyway .and the the significance of the expression, "Wears the soap?"

[papillon] 06/4/2017 19:49

slowfast 6 Apr '17 - 19:40 - 1068 of 1068 0 0 (Filtered)

[slowfast] 06/4/2017 19:40

Ooh,I forgot,it doesn't take any to rattle your cage,what an angry little parrot you are!LOL,LOL,LOL.

[papillon] 06/4/2017 19:21

Aymesco1, sage and the rest of the gullible muppets (including slowfast) on the lse bb need to read this article:



They should take particular notice of these paragraphs in the article:

"Given that statement, one might think that I made a fortune from the stock, having painstakingly researched it and spent hours on conference calls discussing the latest RNS and the questions arising from it. Sadly, the complete opposite was true. Frontera Resources resulted in my biggest loss in the stock market, as it turned out that the company failed miserably on virtually everything it set out to do. Nicandros was very good at NOT coming across as a salesman - he was really quite dour. He was extremely able at getting the information he wanted out, however, and I swallowed it up, hook, line and sinker.

So why am I grateful to Nicandros for being at the centre of such an enormous loss? The simple answer is that the experience made me a much better investor. The loss I made from FRR resulted in me completely re-evaluating my approach to speaking with company directors. I stopped talking to them completely. If something was stated in an RNS that wasn't absolutely crystal clear, and required further clarification, it was a clear red flag that it was designed to be open to interpretation."

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Unfortunately CEO's of cash strapped listed tiddlers are salesmen. They are always needing to keep the suckers (sorry, shareholders!) on board because they will probably need them in future when the company needs to raise more funds. Still if they want to believe the stories CEO's tell them it's not my problem.

At the moment Aymesco1, sage, slowfast etc are down 100% on their investment in CICC & CICG. Currently they have LOST ALL OF THEIR MONEY. Will that change? Who knows? I'm just pleased that I have no money tied up in these companies. I don't want the likes of Aymesco1, sage and slowfast to lose their money; I couldn't give a toss either way whether they make money, or lose money.

[papillon] 06/4/2017 19:06

slowfast 6 Apr '17 - 17:12 - 1065 of 1065 0 0 (Filtered)

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

[slowfast] 06/4/2017 17:12

Oy ultra parrot,who's rattled your cage?Who's a pretty polly eh?Lol.

[papillon] 05/4/2017 17:10

sage
Posts: 53,861
Off Topic
Opinion: No Opinion
Price: 1.425
aymes Today 11:17 I see the lunatics are still in the advfn asylum .. Cue the "parrot" reposting over there.. Maybe they all share a room..all very strange. Maybe they are Boy scouts...thirsting for revenge? Definitely got their woggles in a twist anyway.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Strange how we are called the lunatics, TD, when we are not daft enough to believe all what a CEO tells us over the phone. LOL. You would think Aymesco1 would have learnt his lesson by now after admitting he was told a pack of lies by the CEO's of MTV, PYC & TRP. Still there is one born every minute! LOL.

[the diddymen] 05/4/2017 16:27

sparty you don't need to feel sorry for us.

It is nice to see that the posts over in the Asylum are slightly less obnoxious than historically. I would like to put that down to a slight realisation that Fatboy could have shafted the small shareholders. As ever time will tell and in the interim I will keep an eye on what is going on.

Dr TD

[sparty1] 05/4/2017 11:08

No hope here either!You lot have been posting for years, caustic nonsense.The uninvested posting the inexplicable.A very sad hobby.
Taking turns to congratulate yourselves on your "wit".
We "gullible muppets"feel sorry for you..

[papillon] 31/3/2017 10:26

I think there is no hope for Aymesco1, TD. He's completely deluded. Unbelievably gullible. His written English is also poor.

[the diddymen] 29/3/2017 20:01

Paps here is one of the really deluded on t'other thread:

"The company and Bod are doing all they can there working long ours none stop and have done for years. A lot what's happened is out of there hands. They have invested there own money specially SB on the CICFund side.

I disagree that there will be a mass exit. Once listed we are in a completely diff end league to the rest, companies will list a lot frequently and we will get holdings in them.

I suggest and I have done to several parties if your that greaved by it all then contact the Bod of CICGold and Stuart Bromley of CICFund it's easy to do. Out of all the companies I have holdings in the CIC Group and affiliates have been easy to get hold of and have been a pleasure to deal with.

Keep the faith good things will happen and come of this"


I wonder Aymesco will get as much pleasure from the inbound shafting. Chuffing borrox as they say.

Dr TD

[papillon] 29/3/2017 13:29

Aymesco1, sage and the rest of the gullible muppets on the lse bb need to read this article:



They should take particular notice of these paragraphs in the article:

"Given that statement, one might think that I made a fortune from the stock, having painstakingly researched it and spent hours on conference calls discussing the latest RNS and the questions arising from it. Sadly, the complete opposite was true. Frontera Resources resulted in my biggest loss in the stock market, as it turned out that the company failed miserably on virtually everything it set out to do. Nicandros was very good at NOT coming across as a salesman - he was really quite dour. He was extremely able at getting the information he wanted out, however, and I swallowed it up, hook, line and sinker.

So why am I grateful to Nicandros for being at the centre of such an enormous loss? The simple answer is that the experience made me a much better investor. The loss I made from FRR resulted in me completely re-evaluating my approach to speaking with company directors. I stopped talking to them completely. If something was stated in an RNS that wasn't absolutely crystal clear, and required further clarification, it was a clear red flag that it was designed to be open to interpretation.

There is no edge to be gained from seeking a one to one explanation. Rather, a private chat is destructive to one's investment performance over the long term. The lesson is, read the RNS and act on that, nothing else. Even more importantly, read the RNS with a high degree of suspicion, and ask yourself how you can be tricked into believing the tone of the RNS rather than the legally binding precise words that are used."

Basically the author of this article is saying DON'T TRUST WHAT YOU ARE TOLD BY THE COMPANY & IT'S REPRESENTATIVES OVER THE PHONE! Why? Because they are salesmen whose job is to SELL the company to investors. The author states DON'T speak to the DIRECTORS!

[the diddymen] 22/3/2017 20:24

Read my post yet Mixi; you clearly did not first time.

BB, although there is only tittle tattle evidence, it appears that even if CICC were tradeable, the company has no reserves and is therefore unlikely to be of any value to its shareholders. A set of accounts for year ended 31/01/14 would help!

No great surprises but Fatboy appears to have got himself in a right pickle and I suspect that his pride will come before the general shareholders.

What he does with shareholders who wear ill fitting suits, I do not know.

Dr TD

[brian boru] 22/3/2017 15:57

ok goldwing assuming all is approved and cicgold float, wtf happens to the old cicc shares that have been in limbo for years and are virtually worthless to small shareholders?

[goulding1215] 22/3/2017 15:10

No SB does not call the shots at any of the companies. The UKLA cannot do due diligence on non-directors and share- holders with no voting rights. Despite the number of shares they hold. Without evidence, the UKLA can only deal in FACTS. Regulators have to deal in FACTS. As a previous airline regulator, It would be like my saying, yes the Airline's Training Manual is good, but I cannot pass it because I don't like The Chief Training Captain's background. If the UKLA are taking that attitude then it can only be described as totally prejudiced. However, I am sure that as a British Regulator, they will and do act on a fair and unbiased attitude.
Although, I cannot guess what the delay can be on something as simple as a RTO. Aimho

[papillon] 22/3/2017 14:10

"only a shareholder"? Interesting observation, goulding1215. The CIC Gold web site doesn't list SB as a shareholder (if he is he has less than 3% of the shares in issue). However CIC Capital own 34.60% of CIC Gold shares in issue. They are CIC Golds biggest shareholder by far. SB in turn owns 33.3% of the CIC Capital shares in issue.

SB, as the biggest single shareholder by far, calls the shots at CIC Capital. CIC Capital, as the biggest single shareholder by far, in CIC Gold effectively calls the shots at CIC Gold. Hence SB must, indirectly, by the process of logical deduction still call the shots in CIC Gold!

PS. I'm now filtering goulding1215 for using foul mouthed bad language.

PPS. Whatever delusional shareholders in CIC Capital and CIC Gold may believe will happen in the future CURRENTLY their investment in both companies is worth a BIG FAT ZERO because they are unlisted. Dream on, goulding1215.

[the diddymen] 21/3/2017 19:15

Read my post.

[goulding1215] 21/3/2017 17:42

Yes, TD. Now you realise your post was completely irrelevant, slanderous and libellous, being full of false information. At least I spoke the truth and the facts. I reserve my invective language for lying dopes, of which you are a classic example.

I don't regard enfranglais as a dope as he hasn't graduated from Primary school yet with his childish posts. Mind you when he gets to ten, he might start to grow up.

[the diddymen] 21/3/2017 17:35

....oh and I forgot to thank you for your normal invective. Rather like the CIC stable ; Plus ca change etc

Dr TD