Cic Gold Grp Share Discussion Threads

[the diddymen] 21/3/2017 17:31

It is pointless answering irrelevant questions Mixi, read the post again.

Dr TD

[enfranglais] 21/3/2017 14:44

Poor old mixi, he has lost his marbles (if he ever had any), along with his money!!!
Perhaps in a few years time, the penny will drop & the vitriol will then be directed at the true target?!!!!!

[enfranglais] 20/3/2017 11:02

Stewpid has been 'reversing something into' his 'sheepies' for ever & a day - 'roger' & out!! lol
Perhaps he has Welsh ancestry, as he now has most of the 'sheepies' worried!!!

[highly geared] 19/3/2017 23:01

Is that inside as in " behind bars"?
What an absolute farce this has become. Liquidate please so we can all use CGT losses against bigger and better things. Or reverse something into it....

[papillon] 19/3/2017 22:19

I see leapfrog (previously sense2) is posting again on the CICG bb with apparently "inside" information. LOL.

[the diddymen] 19/3/2017 10:37

"We believe there is value in Mongolia in this piece of land that contains gold and copper? So why can't it be listed?"

The extract above is the last paragraph from a post on the not absolutely deluded thread (there is some realism sneaking in from time to time).

The reason that the CIC stable is struggling to obtain a UK listing is because it has the hallmarks of a dodgy company. It's key shareholder has inappropriate history, transactions are at best opaque, it purports to enter agreements which then turn out to be unenforcable, and it fails to account for its actions. The latter is heinous, because if the 'evidence' is put together the company appears to have lost all of its shareholder funds. Unfortunately no shareholder knows for certain because the formerly listed company has failed to file the accounts which would explain reserve and P&L movements, and any subsequent dilution to finance those movements.

It is very unfortunate for shareholders, but the authorities would be inept to allow a listing without public clarification of many matters. Public listing is essentially a seal of approval that says 'you can trust the executive functions of this company to work for the benefit of all shareholders'. There is no evidence that Fatboy is close to achieving this, and it is unacceptable to say that the listing process is preventing the necessary disclosures.

Dr TD

[papillon] 11/3/2017 14:34

sage
Posts: 53,635
Off Topic
Opinion: No Opinion
Price: 1.425
there`s no way Today 10:28 Barsbold ,with his connections and interests is going to let this deal slip..
I just hope that when we eventually list again..(why delist anyway? apart from wanting a main listing!) CICC will follow in quick succession.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

1/ CICG had to be suspended because of proposed RTO.
2/ CICC had to be de-listed from AIM because it didn't have a NOMAD.

Those are the facts!!

[enfranglais] 03/3/2017 15:29

Agreed Pappy but there is always the humour from the nonsensical illiterate posts that are attracted by Stewpid' s 'no brainer' offerings!!! They just do not get that once he was 'found out', it was only the 'no brainers' who kept investing!!! lol
Of course, mixi is just one of them & others perhaps went to the same 'zulu' school as Stewpid & understanding their posts is as difficult as understanding a 'Stewpid' rns!!!!

[papillon] 03/3/2017 11:04

slowfast2 Mar '17 - 20:36 - 1038 of 1038 0 0 (Filtered)

[papillon] 03/3/2017 11:03

sage
Posts: 53,596
Off Topic
Opinion: No Opinion
Price: 1.425
they Today 08:44 can list and then Buy the asset,without a RTO...Just need the finance

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

sage is completely wrong. CICG would still be a cash shell and the LSE would still class the takeover as an RTO so it just wouldn't happen. CICG have listed once as a cash shell with the proviso they make an acquisition(s) within a limited time frame. I doubt the LSE would let them list again as a cash shell.

[papillon] 02/3/2017 15:53

JoeYangtze
Posts: 838
Off Topic
Opinion: No Opinion
Price: 1.425
RE: the Today 12:31 Yes, it does seem a little confusing at first. Hi I see it as clearing the decks before listing on designated exchange. Then the Very valuable Gobi asset can be placed into CICGold. I cannot imagine it will take long now.

KonarA
Posts: 1,343
Off Topic
Opinion: No Opinion
Price: 1.425
RE: the Today 15:38 Joe - they cannot list and then put in the asset. That would be an RTO and is the reason we are suspended at the moment. Pulling out of the transaction should give us a route back to listing, but I have no idea how they then plan to get the asset in.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Well at least KonarA is being logical, unlike JoeYangtze! Joe seems to have misplaced his brain! LOL.

[papillon] 02/3/2017 12:29

Your total investment in CICC & CICG, goulding, is currently worth ZILCH! ZERO! A BIG FAT NOTHING! Can you comprehend that dopey?

Keep wishing and hoping, dopey! Keep your sh*t detectors on hold! Keep dreaming of untold riches. Keep the fantasy going. LOL

[goulding1215] 02/3/2017 12:24

Read the rns dopey. If you can comprehend the English language.

[bit coin] 02/3/2017 09:54

so no acquisition of the strategic asset................. wtf are CICG planning in its place apart from spewing out more garbage to keep the idiots like mixi in the fold, just saying like!

[the diddymen] 02/3/2017 09:31

Paps, spot on. I will not (won't!) bother to respond to the tittle tattle on LSE.

Dr TD

[papillon] 01/3/2017 18:40

TheDiddymen
Posts: 81
Off Topic
Opinion: No Opinion
Price: 1.425
View Thread (3)Listing Today 14:42 While it is boring, it is important, but until CICC files its 31 Jan 2014, 31 Jan 2015 and 31 Jan 2016 accounts, the UKLA will in my opinion treat CICG with suspicion, because of the common share ownership. No process should ever hold up the filing of accounts; 2014 are now 27 months overdue. Whether CICG would have an action against the UKLA I do not know, but the UKLA can hardly be desribed as tardy when compared to CICC's performance.

We are now a year beyond the 8 weeks that was being touted on these boards for re-listing. Surely the company could provide shareholders with an update that has been cleared by the listings authority so as not to compromise any of the rules.

Aymesco1
Posts: 3,490
Observation
Opinion: Strong Buy
Price: 1.425
Rise Today 18:19 Your not shareholder so what's it to you!

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

It's you're NOT your, Aymesco1. Plus you have forgotten to add a question mark. "Your not shareholder so what's it to you!". He probably enjoys taking the p*ss out of delusional idiots like you! He's also thanking his lucky stars he's not a shareholder!

[the diddymen] 28/2/2017 18:50

Mixi it is not unreasonable to speculate that a major reason why the UKLA is taking so long to relist CICG is because CICC is unable to account to its shareholders for what has happened to its assets. We are now past the fourth anniversary of the last set of accounts. If the company cannot be bothered to report to its shareholders for years, then why expect the UKLA to act in a shorter timescale.

Paps seems to be in a far better position cutting his losses.

Dr TD