ADVFN Logo

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

CHL Cloudified Holdings Limited

37.75
0.00 (0.00%)
Last Updated: 00:00:00
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Cloudified Holdings Limited LSE:CHL London Ordinary Share VGG3338A1158 ORD NPV (DI)
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 37.75 - 0.00 00:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Business Services, Nec 4.57M 1.49M 0.2821 0.74 1.09M
Cloudified Holdings Limited is listed in the Business Services sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker CHL. The last closing price for Cloudified was 37.75p. Over the last year, Cloudified shares have traded in a share price range of 0.00p to 0.00p.

Cloudified currently has 5,264,212 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Cloudified is £1.09 million. Cloudified has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 0.74.

Cloudified Share Discussion Threads

Showing 42876 to 42899 of 70750 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  1726  1725  1724  1723  1722  1721  1720  1719  1718  1717  1716  1715  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
21/4/2016
07:20
Thanks Sienna.Was considering a hefty top up in the next week or so but seeing where this settles
goodbloke1
21/4/2016
07:17
Good bloke....The ICSID Convention "excludes any attack on the award in the national courts."1Investor-state arbitration has become an important form of dispute resolution, not least because of the growing number of bilateral investment treaties and free trade agree- ments. The Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (the "ICSID Convention")2 establishes the most widely used institutions for those arbitrations. Many observers assume that final awards issued by arbi- tral tribunals organized under the auspices of the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) in investor-state arbitrations are final and self-executing, and that the ICSID Convention eliminates defenses in national court to the enforcement of these awards.To date, the limited existing experience with the enforcement of ICSID awards largely bears this out.To the knowledge of the authors, there have been only three decisions challenging the enforcement and execution of ICSID awards in national courts, and one case challenging only execution of the award.All of the enforcement challenges have been unsuccessfulThis may help
siennadelekat21
21/4/2016
07:17
Indonesia News Churchill Mining (LSE: CHL) project took another turn
newtothisgame3
21/4/2016
07:16
Indonesia News Churchill Mining (LSE: CHL) project took another turn
newtothisgame3
21/4/2016
07:16
Indonesia News Churchill Mining (LSE: CHL) project took another turn
newtothisgame3
21/4/2016
07:15
That prat is like an infestation .He trashed the other thread before he got kicked out and now he has started on this one!a purely toxic individual who is a sad excuse for a human being!
goodbloke1
21/4/2016
07:09
So prat thinks he can retire if this hits £2......First he would have to get a job in order to retire instead of living on inheritance having got sacked from a high st bucket shares shop......lol.
blackss
21/4/2016
07:09
Thanks Baxter was comparing to Oxs which could have appealed their decision when they lost?
goodbloke1
21/4/2016
07:08
No - it's a legally binding recognised internationally. There is no appeal and the award has to be paid, else national assets can be seized. Quite a simple and effective process - it may not be quick but it is well designed to protect the interests of businesses operating in other countries. It would equally apply to an Indonesian company who was unfairly treated in the UK.
baxter99
21/4/2016
07:06
This unfortunately is what happens when people like your own fatviera start trashing other threads.
blackss
21/4/2016
06:54
Thanks Baxter for that but surely they can appeal the court decision ?
goodbloke1
21/4/2016
06:52
Goodbloke - an ICSID decision on any award to CHL(final settlement) is binding - there is no appeal. I agree it is highly likely there will be more delaying tactics but the process will continue until ICSID decides the outcome, unless an out of court settlement occurs before then (which I think unlikely).
baxter99
21/4/2016
06:45
wrong thread
pembury
21/4/2016
06:42
The time to get out is if we win the tribunal case as much further delays will occur in my opinion in appeals and enforcement
goodbloke1
21/4/2016
06:41
Prat doesn't understand the process .Roi could appeal any decision taken by the tribunal or the court so delaying the process even further!
goodbloke1
21/4/2016
06:38
Informed reFLection obv
pug151
21/4/2016
06:35
We have a promise from the UK to help ROI get from 100 to 40 on the investor scale.we have ROI and the EU planning a (CEPA)Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement over the next 2 years. A CEPA of this kind must include a process for Investor State Dispute Settlement ISDS. ROI direction of travel for the next 2 years is clear.
The current mess with CHL is awkward to say the least. See below for an informed relection on the relation between ISDS and CEPA.



aAbstract:
Will investor-to-state arbitration be the dispute settlement mechanism of choice for investment disputes under the EU-EAC EPA? This study argues that despite the criticism, ISDS shall be included under the investment chapter in the EU-EAC EPA. This argument is based on three reasons for this;1) The coming into force of the Lisbon Treaty which now gives the EU exclusive competence on Foreign Direct Investment, 2) The existing of numerous BITs between the EU Member States, and the EAC Partner States which stipulate ISDS as the dispute settlement mechanism, 3) both blocs advocate for ISDS in their laws and investment policies. The inclusion of ISDS is likely to shrink the policy space of the EAC Partner States if it is adopted under the existing framework. Therefore, to avoid the situation that has made ISDS unpopular both under the BITs and the NAFTA, it is recommended that the EU and EAC partner ensure a balance between investor rights and the developmental goals of host states. This has been achieved in some of the emerging new generation investment agreements such as the COMESA Common Investment Agreement which is proffered here as a model that can adopted to ameliorate the problems of ISDS as it currently exists in international law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 83

Keywords: Investor-to-State Arbitration, Dispute Settlement, Investment, Economic Partnership Agreement, International Investment law, Foreign Direct Investment

pug151
21/4/2016
06:26
Pat is correct - Indonesia signed up to a binding international treaty. If an award goes to CHL then, if Indonesia do not cough up in full, international assets can and will be seized. It would never come to that because the political and trade consequences are too great. Some posters a scaremongering for their own ends and it is likely there will be a lot more of that today.
baxter99
21/4/2016
06:21
BR's last apology to CHL-

New Churchill Mining Thread - CHL
Bad Robot - 15 Apr 2016 - 10:08:30 - 2681 of 3351
After all, it seems I have been right. I was a bit miffed to be proved wrong which is very rare.

But I am a man of honour, I accepted defeat already on my morning call. Itâ€T82;s only a battle lost, but I always win the wars. BR is not perfect. If there were perfection in the law of physics, big bang would not have happened.

My Target by Monday is 14p.

Hope this helps


LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

p@
21/4/2016
05:54
AndyFirstly I believe assets can be taken however I don't believe this will happenIf the tribunal rules in favour of CHL then I believe there is one more stage,one more court judgementIf Roi didn't pay then no one world wide would do business with ROI as their reputation would be ruined ,worse than it is now
patviera
21/4/2016
05:52
plenty of media headlines about the roi president visit to London.
uk roi agree $19bn+ in jv partnerships

pembury
20/4/2016
22:53
But theres no borrow and warrants at 20. People trying to talk it down. Oh I can. Its going much much higher. LOL. Theyve bought in down on small volume. Good luck.
bones30
20/4/2016
21:47
they gonna bring in the f16's..... not...
nav1000
20/4/2016
21:42
pat,

My question is HOW can it be enforced if they won't play ball?

andy
Chat Pages: Latest  1726  1725  1724  1723  1722  1721  1720  1719  1718  1717  1716  1715  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock