We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chemring Group Plc | LSE:CHG | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B45C9X44 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.50 | 0.96% | 368.00 | 367.00 | 368.00 | 368.00 | 362.50 | 364.50 | 36,290 | 09:04:56 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aircraft Parts, Aux Eq, Nec | 481.9M | 5.4M | 0.0195 | 187.18 | 1.01B |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
20/8/2020 09:21 | Ex Dividend today 1.3p | hawaly | |
20/8/2020 08:52 | Wow, i had a long standing buy order just got filled at 222. Very happy to invest at these levels. Will continue to buy on any volatile dips down. | rimau1 | |
12/6/2020 09:51 | Must have been tipped in I/C? | cravencottage | |
10/6/2020 23:19 | Results day gap @ around 2.17 may close. Might be an interesting level to buy back in. | essentialinvestor | |
03/6/2020 21:40 | Wow what a day | cravencottage | |
03/6/2020 08:06 | Boing Boing..... | cravencottage | |
03/6/2020 08:00 | Very solid imv. | essentialinvestor | |
03/6/2020 07:41 | The No's read well, " Approximately 95% of expected H2 revenue is in the order book or has been delivered to date. specifically " So if they've got most of earnings for H2 in the can already that bodes well imo.. GLA CC | cravencottage | |
03/6/2020 07:14 | Results look good and inline. | johnrxx99 | |
28/5/2020 21:23 | Institutions picking up equity < Results? | cravencottage | |
28/5/2020 10:33 | Looking interesting?, results shortly. | essentialinvestor | |
29/1/2020 20:20 | It's just a formal notification of a change to number of shares in issue - like looks like it's related to staff share options. Low importance RNS as far as I'm concerned | davr0s | |
25/1/2020 16:39 | No they were trades below mid price. That doesn't mean they are sells. Every trade has an opposing trade anyway. Price up strongly means buying pressure greater than selling pressure | davr0s | |
25/1/2020 10:02 | It did Gargoyle2 but through the day there was a lot of large sells. Just shows how resilient the share price is currently which is why I continue to hold. | our haven | |
24/1/2020 20:51 | Profit taking? The price finished pretty much (although not quite) at its highs, didn't it? | gargoyle2 | |
24/1/2020 14:11 | Some interesting profit taking today after the continued gains. I am going to hold for now as I believe there is still some growth to come. | our haven | |
11/1/2020 11:55 | tks for response Clunes - As you indicate, defensive systems could be very complex, expensive and unwanted on a civil airliner. Better to just close problem airspace. If I understand Iran's response this morning, it appears that air traffic control in Iran knew that the aircraft was on a normal scheduled flight, but the army commander in charge of the rocket battery didn't. Under the circumstances it probably seemed likely to him that an attacking aircraft might appear in Iranian airspace. A highly regrettable failure in comms by the look of it. | petersinthemarket | |
10/1/2020 21:13 | You would need a RWR, a Radar Warning Received or possibly two, one at the front and one at the back (in the middle?) and bearing in mind civil airliners are large, you would need an appropriate number of chaff and flare dispensers. There might be other issues to consider such as effectively putting explosives on a civil aircraft albeit in the form of defensive measures and everything from certification issues through to insurance, would you insure an aircraft that needed defensive measures because of the areas it was flying into. The cost, extra weight, aircraft down time and drag are some other issues. I think a few more airliners would have to be shot down accidentally or deliberately to warrant such a modification, ten years ago I would said 99.9% unlikely to ever happen but then civil airliners were not under the apparent threat they are today, so 99.5% unlikely to happen guestimate, from this point on knock a couple of % off everytime it happens. Best bet remains to fly around trouble - avoid it! What is more relevant if tensions remain high is that CHG's share price rose steadily during the last Gulf War for example, but you only need increased training and flying around hostile borders to increase the use of Chemring's products. 4.4% rise but regrettably and ultimately due to some poor souls misery and the potential of war - not good. | clunes100 | |
10/1/2020 16:52 | Interesting thought Clunes - does anyone know if it would be practical to fit the right equipment to throw chaff (foil) in the event of an attack on a commercial airliner? They already have radar, although I don't know if it can see G to A missiles. | petersinthemarket | |
10/1/2020 10:58 | Started to shift as people realise that anti missile flares will be on everyone's shopping list, especially if training and deployment ramps up, let's hope that it is not war, that would be bad news for everyone. Will RWR and flares be fitted to civil airliners, unlikely but this is not the first time an airliner has been "accidentally" shot down in recent times. | clunes100 | |
17/12/2019 16:09 | Could not be better EssentialInvestor.Lo | our haven |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions