We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chaarat Gold Holdings Ltd | LSE:CGH | London | Ordinary Share | VGG203461055 | ORD USD0.01 (DI) |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 2.85 | 2.80 | 2.90 | 2.95 | 2.85 | 2.95 | 59,854 | 08:00:20 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gold Ores | 92.35M | -8.58M | -0.0124 | -2.30 | 19.66M |
TIDMCGH
RNS Number : 6130X
Chaarat Gold Holdings Ltd
27 April 2023
27 April 2023
Chaarat Gold Holdings Limited
("Chaarat" or "the Company")
Kapan Ore Reserves
Chaarat (AIM:CGH), the AIM-quoted gold mining Company with an operating mine in Armenia, and assets at various stages of development in the Kyrgyz Republic is pleased to announce the updated JORC-compliant Ore Reserves Estimate ("ORE") for its Kapan polymetallic mine in the Republic of Armenia. The full ORE report will be published on Chaarat's website.
Highlights
-- AMC Consultants (UK) Limited ("AMC") were engaged by Chaarat Kapan CJSC ("Chaarat") to undertake a review of the Kapan Mine ("Kapan") Ore Reserves and to act as a competent person ("CP") as defined by the JORC (2012) reporting code.
-- Proven & Probable Ore Reserves effective 31 December 2022 were confirmed totalling 3.14 Mt at an AuEq grade of 3.28 g/t consisting of 1.65 g/t Au, 32.47 g/t Ag, 0.36 % Cu, 1.33 % Zn, resulting in a 5-year mine life.
-- This represents an increase of 25% in Ore Reserves, 2% in AuEq grade and an additional 2 years of mine life versus the previous ORE.
-- The 2022 resource definition drilling programme of over 60,000 metres replaced depletion and added additional years to the life of mine plan.
-- Ongoing resource definition drilling will continue to target the conversion of inferred and unclassified mineralisation to allow for further mine life extension.
-- The 2022 constrained Mineral Resource Estimate published in November 2022 contained 722 thousand gold equivalent ounces ("koz AuEq")(1) in Measured & Indicated ("M&I") compared to 583 koz AuEq M&I reported in June 2021, reflecting a 24% increase.
Michael Fraser, Chief Executive Officer, commented:
"We are pleased to report a 25% increase in reserves, and a corresponding 2-year increase in the mine life at Kapan. The MRE and ORE reports demonstrate that there remains a large amount of inferred and unclassified mineralisation at Kapan. The ongoing exploration programme at Kapan will continue to target the conversion of this material to M&I, P&P and ongoing mine life extensions over the coming years."
Updated ORE RESERVES STATEMENT
The following table summarises the recent Kapan ORE (effective 31 December 2022):
Grade Metal Classification Tonnes Au Ag Cu (%) Zn (%) AuEq Au Ag Cu Zn AuEq (Mt) (g/t) (g/t) (g/t) (Koz) (Koz) (Kt) (Kt) (Koz) ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------- ------- ------- Proven 0.21 2.40 42.07 0.51 1.85 4.64 16.2 284.5 1.1 3.9 31.4 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------- ------- ------- Probable 2.93 1.59 31.78 0.35 1.29 3.18 150.0 2,991.1 10.1 37.8 299.0 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------- ------- ------- Total Proven and Probable 3.14 1.65 32.47 0.36 1.33 3.28 166.3 3,275.6 11.2 41.7 330.4 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------- ------- -------
Table 1 Kapan Mine, Ore reserves 2022
Notes:
-- Ore Reserves are reported in accordance with the JORC Code (2012).
-- Ore Reserves based on August 2022 consensus prices for LOM of USD1,750/oz Au, USD21.8/oz Ag, USD8,300/t Cu, and USD2,950 Zn.
-- Ore Reserves are based on a gold equivalent cut-off of 2.3g/t Au. -- Mineral Resources which are not Ore Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. -- Table is subject to rounding errors. -- The average density of 2.64 t/m(3) was used for unmodelled diluting waste material. -- Tonnes reported are in situ, dry tonnes.
The 2021 Ore Reserves statement contained 2.55 Mt at a grade of 1.66 g/t Au, 33.17 g/t Ag, 0.34% Cu, and 1.25% Zn, and 263.7 Koz of AuEq.
As previously announced, the 2022 MRE reflected a 24% increase in contained ounces compared to 2021. As expected from historical conversion rates, this increase has flowed through from the MRE into the ORE resulting in a 25% increase in proven and probable AuEq ounces.
The increase in ORE replaces depletion and adds an additional 2 years of mine life. The 5 years identified in the life of mine plan is consistent with the stated reserve for the history of the Kapan mine. Given the deep dipping nature of the ore body, M&I levels of certainty can only be obtained by underground drilling, which limits how much of the inferred and unclassified mineralisation is converted ahead of mining.
The 2022 MRE shows that there is still significant mineralisation within the Shahyuman ore body. The ongoing exploration definition drilling program will continue to target the conversion of inferred and unclassified mineralisation into M&I. This conversion is expected to flow through into future ORE updates as proven and probable to replace mining depletion and provide additional mine life beyond that indicated in the current reserve.
The full report is available on Chaarat's website at this link .
This announcement contains inside information for the purposes of Article 7 of Regulation (EU) 596/2014 (which forms part of domestic UK law pursuant to the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018).
Enquiries +44 (0)20 7499 Chaarat Gold Holdings Limited 2612 Mike Fraser, Chief Executive Officer IR@chaarat.com Canaccord Genuity Limited (NOMAD and +44 (0)20 7523 Joint Broker) 8000 Henry Fitzgerald-O'Connor James Asensio Gordon Hamilton +44 (0)20 7220 finnCap Limited (Joint Broker) 0500 Christopher Raggett Panmure Gordon (UK) Limited (Joint +44 (0)20 7886 Broker) 2500 John Prior Hugh Rich
About Chaarat
Chaarat is a gold mining company which owns the Kapan operating mine in Armenia as well as Tulkubash and Kyzyltash Gold Projects in the Kyrgyz Republic. The Company has a clear strategy to build a leading emerging markets gold company through organic growth and selective M&A.
Chaarat aims to create value for its shareholders, employees and communities from its high-quality gold and mineral deposits by building relationships based on trust and operating to the best environmental, social and employment standards. Further information is available at www.chaarat.com/ .
Competent Person- Mineral Resource Estimate
The information in this announcement that relates to the mineral resource estimate is based on and fairly represents information and supporting documentation prepared by Dimitar Dimitrov, P. Geo, AIG member and a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the JORC Code 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves' and is a Qualified Person under the AIM Rules . Mr. Dimitar Dimitrov is a part-time employee of the company. Mr. Dimitrov consents to the publication of this new release dated 27 April 2023 by Chaarat. Mr. Dimitrov certified that this news release fairly and accurately represents the information for which he is responsible.
Competent Person- Ore Reserves
The CP for the Ore Reserves declared under the JORC Code (2012) in this report is James Town, Chartered Engineer (CEng), Member of the Institute of Materials, Minerals & Mining (MIMMM). IOM3 membership number: 0478326. Mr Town is a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the JORC Code 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves' and is a Qualified Person under the AIM Rules. Mr Town has reviewed this news release and has consented to its publication with the inclusion of the information for which he is responsible in the form and context in which it appears.
Glossary of Technical Terms
"Ag" chemical symbol for silver "Au" chemical symbol for gold "AuEq" the value of a tonne of mineralised material calculated by summing the value of each contained payable metal and expressing it as an equivalent gold content at a given set of metals prices "Cu" the chemical symbol for copper "Cut-off-grade" the lowest grade value that is included in a Resource or Reserves statement. It must comply with JORC requirement 19: "reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction" the lowest grade, or quality, of mineralised material that qualifies as economically mineable and available in each deposit. It may be defined on the basis of economic evaluation, or on physical or chemical attributes that define an acceptable product specification "g/t" grammes per tonne, equivalent to parts per million "Indicated Mineral that part of a Mineral Resource for which tonnage, Resource" densities, shape, physical characteristics, grade, and mineral content can be estimated with a reasonable level of confidence. It is based on exploration, sampling and testing information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings, and drill holes. The locations are too widely or inappropriately spaced to confirm geological and/or grade continuity
but are spaced closely enough for continuity to be assumed. "JORC" The Australasian Joint Ore Reserves Committee Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves 2012 (the "JORC Code" or "the Code"). The Code sets out minimum standards, recommendations, and guidelines for Public Reporting in Australasia of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves "koz" thousand troy ounces of gold 'Measured Mineral A Measured Mineral Resource has a higher level Resource' of confidence than that applying to either an Indicated Mineral Resource or an Inferred Mineral Resource. A 'Measured Mineral Resource' is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade (or quality), densities, shape, and physical characteristics are estimated with confidence sufficient to allow the application of Modifying Factors to support detailed mine planning and final evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit "Mineral Resource" concentration or occurrence of solid material of economic interest in or on the Earth's crust in such form, grade (or quality), and quantity that there are reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade (or quality), continuity and other geological characteristics of a Mineral Resource are known, estimated or interpreted from specific geological evidence and knowledge, including sampling. Mineral Resources are sub-divided, in order of increasing geological confidence, into Inferred, Indicated and Measured categories "Mt" million tonnes "Ore Reserves" represents the economically mineable part of a Measured and/or Indicated Mineral Resource. It includes diluting materials and allowances for losses, which may occur when the material is mined or extracted and is defined by studies at Pre-Feasibility or Feasibility level as appropriate that include application of Modifying Factors. Such studies demonstrate that, at the time of reporting, extraction could reasonably be justified "oz" troy ounce (= 31.103477 grammes) "Pb" the chemical symbol for lead "Probable Ore represents the economically mineable part of Reserve" an Indicated, and in some circumstances, a Measured Mineral Resource. The confidence in the Modifying Factors applying to a Probable Ore Reserve is lower than that applying to a Proved Ore Reserve " Proved Ore represents the highest confidence category of Reserve" reserve estimate and implies a high degree of confidence in geological and grade continuity, and the consideration of the Modifying Factors "t" tonne (= 1 million grammes) "Zn" the chemical symbol for zinc
12.0 JORC Code, 2012 Edition - Table 1 report
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
Criteria JORC Commentary Code explanation ------------------------------------------------ Sampling Nature and quality of sampling (e.g., cut Sampling comprises historical surface drilling, techniques channels, random chips, or specific specialized historical and current underground drilling, industry standard measurement tools appropriate and channel sampling. to the minerals under investigation, such as Predominantly diamond drilling, and channel down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF cut from the face, with a chisel saw, according instruments, to a marked channel boundary. etc.). These examples should not be taken as Core was drilled along the full mineralization limiting the broad meaning of sampling. intersection, as normal to the mineralization Include reference to measures taken to ensure strike as possible. sample representativity and the appropriate Channel rock chips are providing representative calibration of any measurement tools or systems data collection of the sampled face. used. All sampling practices are meeting the industry Aspects of the determination of mineralization standards. that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g., 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverized to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay'). In other cases, more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralization types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. ------------------ ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ Drilling Drill type (e.g., core, reverse circulation, DH sampling: approximately 717 000 samples techniques open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, (1024km). Bangka, sonic, etc.) and details (e.g., core Channel sampling: approx. 122 000 samples diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of (123.1 diamond tails, face-sampling bit, or other km). type, whether core is oriented and if so, by Total sampling: approx. 840 000 samples what method, etc.) (1147km). Core is predominantly HQ and NQ diameter, singe barrel drilled. Channel samples are chipped along the marked face with a pneumatic hammer and collected by the sampler in one-meter intervals. All channel samples are taken from south to north, in a horizontal fashion, rather than perpendicular to the mineralized dip angle. The results from the channel sampling are used for grade control, modelling, mine design, resource estimation, and for mine reconciliation data. The samples are contoured along all major lithological breaks. ------------------ ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ Drill sample Method of recording and assessing core and The core recovery is assessed by regular recovery chip sample recoveries and results assessed. measurements Measures taken to maximize sample recovery of each drill run and generally excess 95 %. and ensure representative nature of the Core recovery is based on recovered core length samples. vs drill run length, and RC material is Whether a relationship exists between sample assessed recovery and grade and whether sample bias by the recovered weights. may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain There does not appear to be a relationship of fine/coarse material. bias between grade and length, or sample weight or recovery. The average grade of the channel samples is
higher compared to the drilling. This is primarily attributed to the frequency of channel samples in high grade open areas of the mine, compared to drilling ------------------ ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ Logging Whether core and chip samples have been Once the hole is finished, the core is geologically transported and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to the core storage area for logging. The core to support appropriate Mineral Resource trays are plastic, and are covered with a estimation, plastic mining studies and metallurgical studies. cover as well, to prevent core losses or extra Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative moving. in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) The key procedures are including core recovery photography. measuring; sample interval marking; geological The total length and percentage of the relevant and geotechnical logging; photo documentation; intersections logged . sampling and later destruction of non-mineralized part. Core logging is including lithology; alteration; mineralization; structures; obtaining geotechnical data for assess RMR and Q-index. Sampling is primarily based on the visible mineralization, and minimum 2 meters are taken from either side of the sampled interval. The maximum sampling interval is 1 meter, the minimum is 0.2m Once the sampling intervals are outlined, currently a full core diameter is used for assaying. Areas with non-visible mineralization, outside of the expected mineralization zone are not sampled. In absence of visible mineralization, but in areas where mineralization interception is expected the material is sampled depending on the field geologist's decision, considering all the available information. The collection of geological data is meeting the industrial standards. The core logging protocol keeps a high standard, and the involved geologists have sufficient knowledge for Shahumyan mineralization system. ------------------ ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ Sub-sampling If core, whether cut or sawn and whether Prior to July 2017 core was halved with a techniques quarter, diamond and sample half or all core taken. saw and half was sent for analysis and the preparation If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, other half was retained. Since then, the whole rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or core is processed and only the pulps are dry. retained For all sample types, the nature, quality, for future analysis. and appropriateness of the sample preparation The laboratory prepares samples according to technique. industry standard of drying crushing, Quality control procedures adopted for all pulverizing, sub-sampling stages to maximise splitting and analysis. representativity All samples are analysed in the local Kapan's of samples. mine laboratory Measures taken to ensure that the sampling The laboratory is providing Fire Assay with is representative of the in situ material AAS for gold ( 0.2 g/t-1000g/t) , and AAS for collected, Ag ( 0.2 g/t -20000g/t ), Cu ( 0.005%-9.9% including for instance results for field ), Pb ( 0.005%-19.9% ) and Zn ( 0.005%-29.9% duplicate/second-half ). sampling. Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ Quality The nature, quality and appropriateness of The assaying is meeting the industry standards of assay the assaying and laboratory procedures used and it is suitable to support Mineral Resource data and and whether the technique is considered partial estimate. laboratory or total. The current QA/QC scheme is including blank tests For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld samples and certified reference material (CRM). XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in As core is no longer halved, no field determining the analysis including instrument duplicates make and model, reading times, calibrations are assessed, and historically these results factors applied and their derivation, etc. were no good due to highly variable nature Nature of quality control procedures adopted of mineralization. (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external QA/QC achieves acceptable levels of accuracy laboratory checks) and whether acceptable and precision. levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established. ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ Verification The verification of significant intersections Yearly, in each quarter, between 3 and 5 of sampling by either independent or alternative company percent and assaying personnel. of the pulps are sent to Yerevan state The use of twinned holes. laboratory Documentation of primary data, data entry for reference the results. procedures, data verification, data storage A twin analysis has been conducted during (physical and electronic) protocols. 2017-2018 Discuss any adjustment to assay data. by local geology team for channel and diamond drilling (DD) holes and shows potential bias that could be attributed to highly variable nature of mineralization ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ Location Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate Grid system is Pulkovo 1942 /Gauss -Kruger of data drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), zone 8, ( with reduced first 2 digits in the
points trenches, mine workings and other locations BM and wireframes encoding). used in Mineral Resource estimation. Survey is completed underground, with high Specification of the grid system used. precision tools which meets the industrial Quality and adequacy of topographic control. standards: Leica TS16 (3" accuracy), Ranger Explorer II R2231, IMMN_32A. The available digital elevation model of the area topography is used in the Mineral Resource estimation process (surveyed via GPS by expatriate and local surveyors in 2013) ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ Data spacing Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Along the drive advancing, a channel sampling and distribution Results. is taken every blast. Whether the data spacing, and distribution Typically, the space between two blasts is is sufficient to establish the degree of 4 -6m geological The grade control drilling net is 20 X 20 m, and grade continuity appropriate for the adjusted to denser grid, where required Mineral The geostatistical analysis and trial blast Resource and Ore Reserve estimation unit drilling data have shown that thicker procedure(s) data spacing, and distribution do not add any and classifications applied. sufficient value in accuracy of geological Whether sample compositing has been applied. and grade continuity. As majority of samples have 1m in length, the 1m composite is being applied. ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ Orientation Whether the orientation of sampling achieves Geometry is derived and interpreted from of data unbiased sampling of possible structures and underground in relation the extent to which this is known, considering mapping and sampling. True thickness is to geological the deposit type. calculated structure If the relationship between the drilling from apparent thickness, during the orientation interpretation. and the orientation of key mineralised No bias has been introduced through the structures geometry is considered to have introduced a sampling of the sampling and subsequent geological bias, this should be assessed and reported interpretation if material. ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ Sample The measures taken to ensure sample security. The mine process plant and laboratory are security sufficiently secured, with security guards and entry, requiring personal ID cards ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ Audits The results of any audits or reviews of Independent reviews have considered the or reviews sampling sampling techniques and data. process to meet industry best practices: NI 43-101 Technical Report in 2014 (Galen White - QP, Julian Bennett- QP, Simon Meik - QP) and Global Report (Galen White - QP) in 2018 by CSA, report by AMC (Alan Turner, Bryan Pullman) in 2019. At 2021 AMC consulting completed a high-level review of MRE 21. ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------
Section 3 Estimation and Reporting of Mineral Resources
(Criteria listed in section 1, and where relevant in section 2, also apply to this section.)
Criteria JORC Commentary Code explanation ------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Database Measures taken to Data is logged and digitized by trained geologists. integrity ensure that data has The used software is providing several stages not of cross validation, initial through the logging been corrupted by, for process, second when the logging data is imported example, transcription to main database platform (acQuire) and one or keying errors, more time prior the Mineral Resource estimation. between its initial collection and its use for Mineral Resource estimation purposes. Data validation procedures used. ------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Site visits Comment on any site The last site visit of competent person (Dimitar visits undertaken by Dimitrov) for the Mineral Resource was from the Competent Person 17th to 28th of May 2022 and the outcome of Mr.Dimitar Dimitrov P. Geo, AIG member and those a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition visits. of the JORC Code 'Australasian Code for Reporting If no site visits have of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and been undertaken Ore Reserves', is a SVP -Exploration of Chaarat indicate Gold Holdings, and part-time employee of the why this is the case. company. ------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Geological Confidence in (or Based on lithological evidence (drill core interpretation conversely, the logging and underground mapping data) the veins uncertainty and veinlets are being interpreted. of) the geological The Mineral Resource is controlled by hard interpretation of the boundaries of the interpreted geological structures, mineral deposit. including faults and post mineralization barren Nature of the data used dykes. and of any assumptions The geological continuity is reasonable, but made. grade variability is high, often within the The effect, if any, of mineralized structure. alternative interpretations on Mineral Resource estimation. The use of geology in guiding and controlling Mineral Resource estimation. The factors affecting continuity both of grade and geology. ------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dimensions The extent and The Resource includes a series of E-W striking variability of the orebodies (veins), dipping from 45(o) to 90(o) Mineral (mainly in South direction). Vein strike lengths Resource expressed as reach up to 0.5km, and the true thickness ranges length (along strike from several cm to 2m. or otherwise), plan The Resources goes near the surface (950masl) width, and depth below to average of 500 - 600 m asl deep. surface to the upper Further mineralization potential exists below
and lower limits of 600msal, and to the flanks of current Resource, the Mineral Resource. explored historically. ------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Estimation The nature and The Mineral Resource estimation was completed and modelling appropriateness of the in Datamine Studio by Kapan's geological department techniques estimation The wireframes were prepared in Leapfrog Geo technique(s) applied The grades were interpolated by Ordinary Kriging and key assumptions, Top-cuts were applied for each vein (based including treatment of on statistical analysis). extreme grade values, The search radii were defined by variogram domaining, modelling of veins interpolation The estimate was constrained into the hard parameters and maximum boundary of the mineralization interpretation distance of Parent cell dimensions are 4m*4m*4m, with minimum extrapolation from data sub-celling dimensions 0.1m*0.1m*0.1m points. The composite length is 1m If a computer assisted The validation methods currently show high estimation method level of correspondence between resource model was chosen include a and the actual data, and are done via visual description of computer inspection, preparation of Q-Q and swath plots. software and parameters Comparison with previous Mineral Resource estimates used. Reconciliation that includes comparing forecasted The availability of data and measurements in different phases of check estimates, mining process previous estimates and/or mine production records Mineral Inventory (depleted) up to 09-2022 and whether the Mineral : Class Mt SG (g/cm(3) AuEq (g/t) AuEq (koz) Resource estimate ) takes appropriate Meas 0.646 2.75 8.9 185 account of such data. ------- ------------ ----------- ----------- The assumptions made Ind 5.627 2.76 5.3 958 regarding recovery ------- ------------ ----------- ----------- of by-products. M & Estimation of I 6.273 2.76 5.7 1 143 deleterious elements or ------- ------------ ----------- ----------- other Inf 6.790 2.78 4.5 975 non-grade variables of ------- ------------ ----------- ----------- economic significance Total 13.063 2.77 5.0 2 118 (eg sulphur for acid ------- ------------ ----------- ----------- mine drainage characterisation). In the case of block AuEq=Au+Ag*21.8/1750+Cu*8300*31.1035/175000+Zn*2950*31.1035/17500 model interpolation, the block size in relation to the average sample spacing and the search employed. Any assumptions behind modelling of selective mining units. Any assumptions about correlation between variables. Description of how the geological interpretation was used to control the resource estimates. Discussion of basis for using or not using grade cutting or capping. The process of validation, the checking process used, the comparison of model data to drill hole data, and use of reconciliation data if available. ------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Moisture Whether the tonnages Tonnage is reported on dry basis are estimated on a dry basis or with natural moisture, and the method of determination of the moisture content. ------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cut-off The basis of the parameters adopted cut-off The Reasonable Prospects for Eventual Economic grade(s) Extraction of the Mineral Inventory was conducted or quality parameters via Mine Shape Optimization (MSO) run. Cut-off applied. grade of 2.1 g/t AuEq was applied. ------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mining factors Assumptions made The Resource model is based on geology. or assumptions regarding possible The reasonable prospects for eventual economic mining extraction were achieved by running Mineable methods, minimum mining Stope Optimization (MSO) and reported is Resource dimensions and internal is constrained by the MSO. The MSO parameters (or, if applicable, are in accordance with the selective mining external) mining method planned to be implemented. dilution. It is always necessary COG_AuEq_ppm 2.1 ppm as part of the process Used AuEq_formula AUEQV=AU+AG/80+CU/0.6779+ZN/1.9072 of determining ----------------------------------- reasonable prospects Ore body dip MMU (MSO) for eventual 80(o) -90(o) 1.2m economic extraction to 70(o) -80(o) 1.8m consider potential < 70(o) 2.2m mining methods, but the ----------------------------------- assumptions made Development overbreak 0% regarding mining Production Stope methods and parameters overbreak: when First mining sublevel 5% estimating Mineral Middle sublevel 10% Resources may not Bottom sublevel 15% always ----------------------------------- be rigorous. Where this is the case, this should be reported with Kapan's 2022 Mineral Resource is: an explanation of SG (g/cm3 the basis of the mining Class Mt ) AuEq (g/t) AuEq (koz) assumptions made. Meas 0.341 2.76 12.1 132 ------ ---------- ----------- ----------- Ind 2.261 2.77 8.1 590 ------ ---------- ----------- ----------- M & I 2.602 2.77 8.6 722 ------ ---------- ----------- ----------- Inf 1.864 2.77 6.5 389 ------ ---------- ----------- ----------- AuEq=AU+AG*21.8/1750+CU*8300*31.1035/175000+ZN*2950*31.1035/17500 ------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Metallurgical The basis for The metal recovery data is as follows: Process recovery Units 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 factors or assumptions or Au recovery assumptions predictions (all con) % 83.6 76.2 79.7 73.1 75.5 regarding metallurgical ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- amenability. It is Ag recovery always necessary as (all con) % 83 80.9 82.4 82.2 82.5 part of the process of ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- determining reasonable Cu recovery
prospects for eventual (Cu con) % 86.4 83.6 86.4 87 85.2 economic extraction to ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- consider potential Zn recovery metallurgical methods, (Zn con) % 81.9 77.4 80.2 76.4 71.1 but the assumptions ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- regarding metallurgical treatment processes Extraction of Au and parameters made at refining % 91 when reporting Mineral Extraction of Ag Resources may not at refining % 84 always be rigorous. --- Where Extraction of Cu this is the case, this at refining % 94 should be reported --- with an explanation of Extraction of Zn the basis of the at refining % 85 metallurgical ------------------ --- assumptions made. Metal recovery is not directly applied in the reported Resource. ------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Environmental Assumptions made There are no known factors which may inhibit factors or regarding possible the extraction of the Resource assumptions waste and process residue disposal options. It is always necessary as part of the process of determining reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction to consider the potential environmental impacts of the mining and processing operation. While at this stage the determination of potential environmental impacts, particularly for a greenfields project, may not always be well advanced, the status of early consideration of these potential environmental impacts should be reported. Where these aspects have not been considered this should be reported with an explanation of the environmental assumptions made. ------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bulk density Whether assumed or Currently the density estimation is using polynomial determined. If assumed, regression model based on modelled sulphur the basis for the grade: assumptions. If If S >= 19.8 %, Density == exp [0.2587x + 0.4835], determined, for x = ln (S grades) the method used, If S > 1 and S <19.8%, Density == exp [0.0114169x6 whether wet or dry, the - 0.0891652x5 + 0.26951043x4 + 0.38060004x3 frequency of the + 0.23832052x2 + 0.0052027x + 0.9070334], for measurements, the x = ln (S grades) nature, If S<1, Density = 2.65 g/cm3 size and In dykes Density = 2.65 g/cm3 representativeness of This approach is considered as slightly conservative the samples. scenario for density assessment. The bulk density for bulk material must have been measured by methods that adequately account for void spaces (vugs, porosity, etc), moisture and differences between rock and alteration zones within the deposit. Discuss assumptions for bulk density estimates used in the evaluation process of the different materials. ------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Classification The basis for the The model is classified according to the quantity classification of the and quality of the data. Mineral Resources into The Measured Mineral Resource category was varying confidence assigned to portions of the ore bodies in the categories. following cases: Whether appropriate In the areas of current mine development workings, account has been taken informed by both channel sampling data and of all relevant factors drilling data and where the data spacing is (ie relative confidence less than 20x20 m. in tonnage/grade estimations, The Indicated category was assigned to the reliability portions of the ore bodies in the following of input data, cases: confidence in - In the areas with the exploration grid spacing continuity of up to 20×20 m, provided there was enough geology and metal confidence in the continuity of the ore body values, quality, mineralization between the drill holes. quantity - In the areas of extrapolation to up to 30 and distribution of the m distance from the last sublevel drift in data). down-dip/up-dip direction of the ore body, Whether the result provided there was enough confidence in the appropriately reflects continuity of its mineralization. The intersections the Competent Person's of extrapolation areas by exploration drill view of the deposit. holes are not required in this case. - In the areas of extrapolation to up to 30 m distance from the last sublevel drift in the downdip /up-dip direction of the ore body. In case of any doubts in continuity of this ore body mineralization, the exploration grid spacing of not more than 20-30 m is required to classify the mineralization as an Indicated Mineral Resource. The Inferred category was assigned to the portions of the ore bodies if they could not be classified as an Indicated Mineral Resource. ------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Audits or The results of any No external audits or reviews were conducted reviews audits or reviews of for MRE 2022 Mineral Resource estimates. ------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Discussion Where appropriate a The effective date of the Resource is 01.09.2022 of relative statement of the Model estimates were checked by QQ plots, swath accuracy/ relative plots, and by comparing the volumes of the confidence accuracy and confidence wireframes and the block model, statistically level in the Mineral and visually. Resource estimate using an approach or procedure deemed appropriate by the Competent Person. For example, the application of statistical or geostatistical procedures to quantify the relative accuracy of the resource within stated confidence limits, or, if such an approach is not deemed appropriate, a qualitative discussion of the factors that could affect the relative accuracy and confidence of the estimate. The statement should specify whether it relates to global or local estimates, and, if local, state the relevant tonnages, which should be relevant to
technical and economic evaluation. Documentation should include assumptions made and the procedures used. These statements of relative accuracy and confidence of the estimate should be compared with production data, where available. ------------------------ -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JORC CODE, 2012 EDITION - TABLE 1 REPORT
Section 4 Estimation and Reporting of Ore Reserves
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Mineral Resource * Description of the Mineral Resource estimate used as * The Mineral Resource Estimate was produced by Mr estimate for a basis for the conversion to an Ore Reserve. Dimitar Dimitrov, Senior VP Exploration of Chaarat, conversion to with an effective date of 1 September 2022 as Ore Reserves described in Section 3. * Clear statement as to whether the Mineral Resources are reported additional to, or inclusive of, the Ore Reserves. * The Mineral Resources are reported inclusive of the Ore Reserves. ============================================================ ================================================================== Site visits * Comment on any site visits undertaken by the * A site visit, of four days, was undertaken by the Ore Competent Person and the outcome of those visits. Reserves Competent Person (CP), Mr James Town of AMC Consultants (UK) Limited, in July 2019. * If no site visits have been undertaken indicate why this is the case. * No recent site visits have been undertaken due to security-related travel restrictions. ============================================================ ================================================================== Study status * The type and level of study undertaken to enable * Kapan Mine has been operating since 1994 and at full Mineral Resources to be converted to Ore Reserves. production for more than 15 years. Information gathered during the production period has been used to update and inform the current Ore Reserve. * The Code requires that a study to at least Production, sales, and other data from the previous Pre-Feasibility Study level has been undertaken to five years were used as a basis for assessing the ore convert Mineral Resources to Ore Reserves. Such reserve calculation. studies will have been carried out and will have determined a mine plan that is technically achievable and economically viable, and that material Modifying * The Ore Reserve is based on the life-of-mine design Factors have been considered. generated by the Mine Technical Services Department (effective date of 1 January 2023), which has been reviewed by AMC. * AMC produced a schedule and cost model based on the data provided by Chaarat. ============================================================ ================================================================== Cut-off parameters * The basis of the cut-off grade(s) or quality * Cut-off grades are calculated using a gold equivalent parameters applied. (AuEq) calculation using the revenue contributions of the four payable metals Au, Ag, Cu, and Zn. * The AuEq calculation includes all site operating costs associated with the mine, process plant, and G&A along with royalties, transport and concentrate treatment, and refining charges and penalties. * Mining areas are considered for inclusion in the Ore Reserve if the diluted AuEq is greater than, or equal to, 2.3 g/t AuEq. ============================================================ ================================================================== Mining factors or assumptions * The method and assumptions used as reported in the * Ore Reserves are based on an operating mine design Pre-Feasibility or Feasibility Study to convert the generated by the on-site technical staff, which has Mineral Resource to an Ore Reserve (i.e. either by been reviewed by AMC. application of appropriate factors by optimisation or by preliminary or detailed design). * The mining method used is long-hole open-stoping, which is an appropriate method for the narrow-vein * The choice, nature and appropriateness of the deposit. The mining method has been refined with selected mining method(s) and other mining parameters operational experience. including associated design issues such as pre-strip, access, etc. * Grade control consists of pre-development diamond drilling at approximately 20 m spacing followed by * The assumptions made regarding geotechnical mapping and face channel sampling at approximately 4 parameters (eg pit slopes, stope sizes, etc), grade m spacing during vein drive development. All samples control and pre-production drilling. are processed at the on-site laboratory with 5% control samples sent to external international laboratories. * The major assumptions made and Mineral Resource model used for pit and stope optimisation (if appropriate). * SRK completed a geotechnical study in 2013, from which site geotechnical personnel have developed * The mining dilution factors used. procedures with operational experience. All development headings and stopes are assessed before and during development by the Geotechnical Engineer * The mining recovery factors used. and have geotechnical specifications detailing support requirements. * Any minimum mining widths used. * Individual stopes have a maximum length of 80 m and maximum height of 18 m, with a maximum of three * The manner in which Inferred Mineral Resources are stopes forming a panel between a crown pillar, with
utilised in mining studies and the sensitivity of the surface and sill pillars between levels. outcome to their inclusion. * A minimum mining width of 2.2 m has been applied to * The infrastructure requirements of the selected the Ore Reserve using Mineable Shape Optimizer(TM) mining methods. (MSO). * Current mining areas are accessed via portals located at the south of the deposit and multiple declines located across the deposit. * Dilution is accounted for in the Ore Reserve on a vein-by-vein basis, based on geometry and historic production statistics. The average dilution factors in the Ore Reserve are: _ Primary mining dilution (minimum mining width): 54%. _ Secondary mining dilution (unplanned in stope): 9%. * Mining losses are estimated to be 2% of the Ore Reserve. * Inferred and Unclassified Mineral Resources were treated as waste dilution. ============================================================ ================================================================== Metallurgical factors or * The metallurgical process proposed and the * Gold and zinc concentrates are produced through assumptions appropriateness of that process to the style of conventional crushing, grinding, flotation, mineralisation. thickening, and filtration. * Whether the metallurgical process is well-tested * The process is well-tested and has been in operation technology or novel in nature. at Kapan for more than 15 years. * The nature, amount and representativeness of * The process plant has two primary jaw crushers metallurgical test work undertaken, the nature of the capable of crushing 2 Mtpa. The grinding and metallurgical domaining applied and the corresponding flotation circuits have a maximum capacity of metallurgical recovery factors applied. approximately 900 ktpa. * Any assumptions or allowances made for deleterious * Metallurgical recoveries are based on historical elements. plant performance data. * The existence of any bulk sample or pilot scale test * The Ore Reserve is based on the Mineral Resource work and the degree to which such samples are Estimate which includes individual estimation considered representative of the orebody as a whole. parameters for the payable metals Au, Ag, Cu, and Zn; and as such, is appropriate to the mineralogy being processed. * For minerals that are defined by a specification, has the ore reserve estimation been based on the appropriate mineralogy to meet the specifications? * Operational metallurgical testwork is carried out daily at the plant metallurgical test laboratory. * Deleterious elements Pb and S are also modelled in the Mineral resource model; however, with the current mining locations and for the remainder of the mine plan, the grades are not high enough to warrant corrective measures in the process plant. ============================================================ ================================================================== Environmental * The status of studies of potential environmental * Chaarat possesses the required permits and planning impacts of the mining and processing operation. permissions to effectively operate the Kapan Mine, in Details of waste rock characterisation and the accordance with Armenian environmental regulations. consideration of potential sites, status of design options considered and, where applicable, the status of approvals for process residue storage and waste * To the best of the CP's knowledge, all sites for dumps should be reported. waste rock and process tailings and their design and construction have complied with all environmental regulations, permits, and recommendations. ============================================================ ================================================================== Infrastructure * The existence of appropriate infrastructure: * All infrastructure required for the processing and availability of land for plant development, power, mining of ore is in place and has been in place since water, transportation (particularly for bulk exploration of the deposit in Soviet times (1980s). commodities), labour, accommodation; or the ease with The mine is located adjacent to the town of Kapan on which the infrastructure can be provided, or the main trunk-road connecting southern Armenia to accessed. the capital city, Yerevan. ============================================================ ================================================================== Costs * The derivation of, or assumptions made, regarding * Operating costs are based on site operating costs. projected capital costs in the study. AMC has reviewed historical cost reports including copies of major contractor invoices. * The methodology used to estimate operating costs. * Treatment and refining costs are based on current concentrate sales terms. AMC has reviewed historical * Allowances made for the content of deleterious gold and zinc concentrate sales invoices to confirm elements. the inputs used in the calculations. * The source of exchange rates used in the study. * Penalty elements are accounted for in the concentrate treatment charges. * Derivation of transportation charges. * Government royalties are included at 6% of NSR. * The basis for forecasting or source of treatment and refining charges, penalties for failure to meet specification, etc. * The allowances made for royalties payable, both Government and private. ============================================================ ================================================================== Revenue
factors * The derivation of, or assumptions made regarding * Head grades are based on the block model generated by revenue factors including head grade, metal or Chaarat in September 2022. commodity price(s) exchange rates, transportation and treatment charges, penalties, net smelter returns, etc. * Revenue has been based on metal prices of USD1,850/oz Au, USD21.8/oz Ag, USD8,500/t Cu and USD3,000/t Zn applied to the concentrate sales terms. These figures * The derivation of assumptions made of metal or are representative of economic forecasts for the commodity price(s), for the principal metals, period. minerals and co-products. * Transportation, treatment charges and penalties for both gold and zinc concentrates are accounted for in the AuEq cut-off grade calculation. ============================================================ ================================================================== Market assessment * The demand, supply and stock situation for the * Chaarat has agreements with long-term established particular commodity, consumption trends and factors customers for concentrate sales. likely to affect supply and demand into the future. * Gold concentrate is sold to Industrial Minerals in * A customer and competitor analysis along with the Montreal, Canada. Gold concentrate is bagged on-site, identification of likely market windows for the loaded into containers and transported by road to product. Poti, Georgia. From Poti, the containers are sea-freighted to Montreal, Canada. * Price and volume forecasts and the basis for these forecasts. * Zinc concentrate is sold to Trafigura in Antwerp, Belgium. Zinc concentrate is bagged on-site, loaded into containers and transported by road to Poti, * For industrial minerals the customer specification, Georgia. From Poti, the containers are sea-freighted testing and acceptance requirements prior to a supply to Antwerp. contract. ============================================================ ================================================================== Economic * The inputs to the economic analysis to produce the * No separate NPVs have been generated as part of the net present value (NPV) in the study, the source and Ore Reserves determination; however, all material confidence of these economic inputs including contained within the reserve is deemed to generate estimated inflation, discount rate, etc. positive cashflow based on the economic input parameters. * NPV ranges and sensitivity to variations in the significant assumptions and inputs. * A life of mine plan (LOMP) has been generated from the December 2021 mine design. Analysis of the LOMP physicals within the current Chaarat financial model has been shown to yield a net positive cashflow and NPV. ============================================================ ================================================================== Social * The status of agreements with key stakeholders and * To the best of the CP's knowledge, all agreements matters leading to social licence to operate. with the local authorities are in place and are current with all key stakeholders. ============================================================ ================================================================== Other * To the extent relevant, the impact of the following * To the best of the CP's knowledge, Chaarat is on the project and/or on the estimation and currently compliant with all legal and regulatory classification of the Ore Reserves: requirements and there is no reason to assume any further government or local council permits, licences, or statutory approvals will not be granted, if * Any identified material naturally occurring risks. required. * The status of material legal agreements and marketing arrangements. * The status of governmental agreements and approvals critical to the viability of the project, such as mineral tenement status, and government and statutory approvals. There must be reasonable grounds to expect that all necessary Government approvals will be received within the timeframes anticipated in the Pre-Feasibility or Feasibility study. Highlight and discuss the materiality of any unresolved matter that is dependent on a third party on which extraction of the reserve is contingent. ============================================================ ================================================================== Classification * The basis for the classification of the Ore Reserves * The Ore Reserves have been broken down into Proved into varying confidence categories. and Probable categories as per JORC Code (2012) guidelines. * Whether the result appropriately reflects the Competent Person's view of the deposit. * It is the CP's opinion that the Ore Reserves reflect the deposit accurately given the current level of geological and geotechnical knowledge. * The proportion of Probable Ore Reserves that have been derived from Measured Mineral Resources (if any). * No Probable Ore Reserves have been derived from Measured Mineral Resources. * Inferred resources have not been included in the Ore Reserve. ============================================================ ================================================================== Audits or reviews * The results of any audits or reviews of Ore Reserve * The Competent Person completed a "best practices" estimates. review of the mine planning as part of the Ore Reserves. * The Ore Reserve has been peer-reviewed internally and is in line with current industry standards. ============================================================ ================================================================== Discussion of relative * Where appropriate a statement of the relative * Kapan Mine is in production and has more than 15
accuracy/ accuracy and confidence level in the Ore Reserve years of historic process production data and costs. confidence estimate using an approach or procedure deemed appropriate by the Competent Person. For example, the application of statistical or geostatistical * The deposit is well-understood by the on-site procedures to quantify the relative accuracy of the technical team which consists of locals with reserve within stated confidence limits, or, if such long-term experience of the deposit. an approach is not deemed appropriate, a qualitative discussion of the factors which could affect the relative accuracy and confidence of the estimate. * Owner and contractor costs are based on current actual costs. * The statement should specify whether it relates to global or local estimates, and, if local, state the * All modifying factors have been applied to the Ore relevant tonnages, which should be relevant to Reserves with updated dilution parameters for each technical and economic evaluation. Documentation individual vein based on widths and geotechnical should include assumptions made and the procedures assessments. used. * Work is ongoing on-site to reconcile and * Accuracy and confidence discussions should extend to better-account for unplanned mining dilution. specific discussions of any applied Modifying Factors that may have a material impact on Ore Reserve viability, or for which there are remaining areas of * Geological mapping and survey of vein drives is uncertainty at the current study stage. supporting the validity of the resource model to a level of confidence consistent with Ore Reserve reporting. * It is recognised that this may not be possible or appropriate in all circumstances. These statements of relative accuracy and confidence of the estimate * Historical mine-to-mill reconciliation on an annual should be compared with production data, where and quarterly basis supports the validity of the available. resource model to a level of confidence consistent with Ore Reserve reporting. * Current AuEq cut-off grade practice at the mine might have an impact on mining areas where grade variations in different metals are encountered. AMC recommends development of a net smelter return (NSR) based valuation and cut-off grade calculation for use in future Ore Reserves. ============================================================ ==================================================================
This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact rns@lseg.com or visit www.rns.com.
RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services. For further information about how RNS and the London Stock Exchange use the personal data you provide us, please see our Privacy Policy.
END
UPDPPUMWCUPWGBQ
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
April 27, 2023 02:00 ET (06:00 GMT)
1 Year Chaarat Gold Chart |
1 Month Chaarat Gold Chart |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions