We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centrom | LSE:CET | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B08N4R59 | ORD 1P |
| Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.09 | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
| Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - |
| Last Trade Time | Trade Type | Trade Size | Trade Price | Currency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | O | 0 | 0.09 | GBX |
Centrom (CET) Share Charts1 Year Centrom Chart |
|
1 Month Centrom Chart |
Intraday Centrom Chart |
| Date | Time | Title | Posts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29/7/2009 | 22:41 | Centrom Group.........Computer Services | 1,033 |
| 05/2/2009 | 18:23 | centrom bid price specualation | 18 |
| 24/1/2001 | 09:16 | Today's sell candidate from......... | - |
| Trade Time | Trade Price | Trade Size | Trade Value | Trade Type |
|---|
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 18/5/2009 20:19 by storming norm To anyone interested a group of shareholders who collectively hold more than 10% of CET have banded together on the Interactive Investor website to ensure that the board do not get the 90% they require. If you wish to add your shareholding to their list they can be contacted at notgonnagetscrewedby |
Posted at 12/5/2009 19:38 by induna123 Do you know if anyone has written to the takeover board? I think CET should have been under obligation to comment on the share price raising so high as 'the doctor' says, I believe it peaked at about 0.8p after the offer which is about 35 times the offer from Maymask. I would be very unhappy if I have bought in after the anouncement. |
Posted at 10/5/2009 11:31 by 2magpies the_doctoryou may have hit upon something there. At the time that the company's share price was trading at 0.23 (ish) the Board knew that discussion about the takeover were taking place which would result in a much, much lower bid -- it was eventually made at a tenth, yes a TENTH, of the prevailing price. The Board should have issued an RNS to the effect that the share price level was not justified (or knew of no reason why it was at that level). Something else to say to the Takeover Panel: Also alert AIM Regulation: |
Posted at 09/5/2009 08:59 by 2magpies I suggest we all e-mail the takeover panel, and ask them to (1)request info from CET re who is buying @ more than 8x the Maymask bid, and (2) remind CET that NO one connected with CET in ANY way is allowed to buy @ levels above the Maymask bid, i.e. 0.00023Market Surveillance Unit Telephone: 020 7638 0129 Fax: 020 7236 7013 E-mail: monitoring@disclosur |
Posted at 07/4/2009 10:08 by v11slr Purely theoretical.Company A is at 10p. Company A has a new product/deal that will see it at 20p in short order. Company A is mostly owned by small investors. Small investors do not know about forthcoming product/deal. Persons who do know own Company B without lots of small investors. Company B puts in agreed bid for Company A at 1p. Company A share price collapses. Persons who know offer to buy Company A shares at 2p. Grateful small investors accept. Offer goes unconditional. Company A directors move to Company B with good options package/golden hello. Company B announces new product/deal. Company B price soars. Result PIs are removed from the picture. Persons in the know profit greatly. I am NOT saying this is happening here. |
Posted at 12/2/2009 23:25 by 29palms Like I've been saying the MDX bods here are trying the scaremongering trick, day in day out.Has any of them looked at who actually holds shares in CET? This ain't no MDX. RT's holding in CET is miniscule. Being the major shareholder, Mr Mark Venables, holds the casting vote in any discussions taking place regardless of what the scaremongers "think" RT is plotting. These people should wake up, smell the coffee and just keep "thinking" because that is what they are good at!! Today's ponderable-the share price went North today on 500k+ selling. As always, DYOR 29palms |
Posted at 23/1/2009 07:47 by induna123 "suffered considerable financial loss because i believed in the integrity of the BOARD OF MELDEX"Precisely, CET is a different company. Gerald Malone is running the show, not Richard Trevellion, he is merely a non-exec. Also, CET is in a different situation to MDX in that the share price is already depressed at near it's all time low. Please, stop trying to put your anger and bitterness on to us, CET is in a completely different situation to MDX. There is no similarity. |
Posted at 16/1/2009 07:45 by whites123 LOL at Dell boy....How you doing buddy????? I believe you still post on iii, seen your name a few times on bb's, but they introduced an ignore button, so i never get to see you... Dead right me old mucker, i picked some right old howlers, and it was looking like CET was one of them... BUT NOT NOW..... But hey.... This is about CET, not my howlers nor the ones that have returned massive increases for me which now allow me the lifestyle i enjoy.. Once again though, you cut and paste to suit your agenda... Which is what by the way? Do you think CET could be a good punt? or are you blinkered by your love for me that you can not see a decent investment when it stares you in the eyes?? I see you still selectively cut and paste... But whats the deal with the options that you and everyone else keeps harping on about??? because for the options to become worthwhile the share price of CET needs to surpass that.. Are you therefore suggesting that indeed CET will pass through 1p, and then pass through 2.5p and then pass through 5p.. If you are, then well done dellboy... You arent quite as thick as i had the suspicion you were.. With all your safe plays i am betting you have made a killing this year?? No..... O well, theres a shame... :-) The options subject to the 2.5p price threshold will be exercisable at any time from the first anniversary of grant to the tenth anniversary. The options subject to the 5p price threshold will be exercisable at any time from the second anniversary of grant to the tenth anniversary. Subject to Shareholders approving the Incentive Arrangements at the AGM it is intended to award options with an option exercise price of 1p per Ordinary Share (or as such higher amount as equals the market value of the shares at the date of grant) as follows: |
Posted at 16/1/2009 07:33 by dell314 FWIW, whites123 happens to be iii's multi-aliased pump'n'dump bullsh*tter, tiptornado, T_T, dstenson, Atrocity Exhibition, letsmakemoney and all his other user names. The same guy that reckoned he had a source that told him to get into SPIL. Unfortunately it dived 75% soon afterwards on a profit warning. Nice source! The same guy that always claims to be chatting to directors and have his finger on the pulse, yet has left a trail of minus 90%ers and busted companies in his wake. How many times did you chat to Jasper at OEP and tell us all it was THE share to buy, "mate"? I'll bet your pal, Jasper made sure all the decent bits of OEP ended up in his other companies, when it went bust.... And back to CET, isn't it odd how your earlier lengthy piece on here about CET mentioned 5p options, yet you forgot to mention the 2.5p options and the 1p options! Like these ones, for example: Subject to Shareholders approving the Incentive Arrangements at the AGM it is intended to award options with an option exercise price of 1p per Ordinary Share (or as such higher amount as equals the market value of the shares at the date of grant) as follows: Number of Ordinary Shares Mike Boseley 18,675,000 David Whitehead 12,450,000 Gerald Malone 6,225,000 Other employees 2,790,000 Total 40,140,000 Did you really forget, "mate", or deliberately not mention them? And let's not forget that CET's last results showed a loss, massive net liabilities, falling sales and declining margins. They also mentioned bank facilities which is always a worry..... And it's also worth noting that yesterday's RNS didn't say that CET had received an approach, it said that the company was in discussions. i.e. CET may well be unable to continue as a going concern, so may be approaching other parties looking for a buyer.... Maybe you'll be lucky here. Maybe you won't but stop trying to con everyone, eh? Rgds dell All IMHO, DYOR etc. |
Posted at 25/7/2008 09:18 by fesuvious well, I don't have much arguament to that !I guess I am trying to find the upside to having this man at the top. However, whatever way you look at it, if he stays there then there is a possibility of good contracts, and the share price will move up. If he were to go then renewed confidence would mean the share price will rise. The financial position whilst certainly not setting the world alight certainly has not deteriorated as far as the share price. There are plenty of companies out there in a similar financial position with a share price 8 times higher. Its all about confidence. Id rather take a gamble on a share devalued by lack of confidence than devalued through its finacial position for the greater part. Make no mistake, I view this share as a gamble, and a big one at that but looking at the financials, and the chart, and the companies website I cannot help but feel there is a possibility of something happening that could see a significant return of confidence. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
