ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

SWC Celadon Pharmaceuticals Plc

147.50
0.00 (0.00%)
19 Apr 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Celadon Pharmaceuticals Investors - SWC

Celadon Pharmaceuticals Investors - SWC

Share Name Share Symbol Market Stock Type
Celadon Pharmaceuticals Plc SWC London Ordinary Share
  Price Change Price Change % Share Price Last Trade
0.00 0.00% 147.50 01:00:00
Open Price Low Price High Price Close Price Previous Close
147.50 147.50
more quote information »

Top Investor Posts

Top Posts
Posted at 02/3/2022 16:01 by go2nc
It is difficult to value this company. Market will do what it does. But if you look at some of the fundamentals. First of all no one is selling medicinal THC yet. There are loads of companies selling CBD. You can buy it on ebay. Secondly they are targeting chronic pain market which is one of the commonest health condition in the world. Thirdly they have licenses in place to get THC to the market. Fourth they raised 80 plus millions at 165p with IIs. With authority I can say I know this field better than majority investors. I don't know how share price will move but IIs don't fork out such money without due diligence. Also hargyHale bought 1 million worth share from Abu.
Posted at 11/4/2021 20:18 by pol123
Special guest tomorrow is Vin Murria OBE often labelled as the Queen of Tech. She has an incredible track record as an entrepreneur, business leader & indeed as an investor so truly one of us
Thumbs up
I will interview Vin at 6pm but do post Q's here for me to ask hxxps://melloevents.com/mellomonday-12

Questions #SWC Twitter David@Carmensfella
Posted at 05/5/2010 19:08 by william-just
most aim co's screw the investors but we all come back for more.
Posted at 14/4/2010 12:02 by fludde
Why would anyone? Suckered in on the back of a business plan that only served to improve the directors bank balance at the expense on ours.

Existing shareholders may be stuck- to any new investors DON'T DO IT!
Posted at 15/3/2010 08:57 by fludde
Oh and the other thing about these incompetent idiots- they do not reply to e-mails from their investors (or marks as they know them).
Posted at 23/7/2009 13:24 by william-just
RNS Number : 1559W
Sweet China PLC
23 July 2009

?Sweet China plc (the "Company")
Holding in Company


The Company has been informed that Ian Walker, a substantial shareholder of the
Company, has disposed of 4,522,941 shares in the Company. As a consequence he
now holds 36,757,059 shares in the Company, which amounts to approximately 37.6%
of the issued share capital of the Company.
Ian Walker has brought his shareholding to below 40% in order to help bring in
new investors to Sweet China. The additional shares in the market will help
facilitate further new investors to participate in what is expected to be an
exciting year for the Company.
Posted at 09/12/2008 12:23 by fludde
Excellent- they declare 79.61% of shares in significant tranches of over 3%. At about the same time Chris Cleverly has options which would give him 22.98% of the company.

Interesting sums! And that does not include any small investors.
Posted at 09/12/2008 10:46 by fludde
True and positive PR is to be welcomed.

I am not aware of any publication of shareholdings other than Chris Cleverley when he held almost 30%. Certainly do not know what the current board holdings are or any other significant investors.
Posted at 08/10/2008 09:52 by fludde
It looks as if we are continuing to self destruct.

We are living the self fulfilling prophecy- everything is going down the tubes so we sell up and ensure that everything does go down the tubes.

If it ain't broke don't fix it- but as the government are trying to fix it, boy it must be really broke; so we get out while we can and the problem they are trying to fix becomes a different problem.

If anyone bothered to look- sorry if EVERYONE bothered to look at the problem and rationalise it we would leave the banking stocks alone for 6 months and come back later to see how our investments were doing. Unfortunately the usual conflict of fear and greed drive so many investors that the emotional turmoil will continue for some time to come.

So can governments fix the problem? Not really- they can put an infrastructure in place and we the investors will decide if we feel confident enough to behave rationally. If, en masse, we don't feel confident then the turmoil will continue- for a while at least.

Ignoring the safety net arrangements, what I really want to know is should my bank fail, why is it possible to lose my savings but impossible to lose my mortgage?
Posted at 26/9/2008 09:25 by fludde
And there you have it- Talking a share up is as bad as talking one down.

The mass hysteria of buying a share forcing the price up is as unjust as the hysterical selling we have seen of late. In both cases people jumping on the bandwagon too late will lose money whether they buy at the top or sell at the bottom.

It is arguably easier to talk a share down than to talk it up. Whilst fear is as strong an emotion as greed, most investors probably invest in a share in the hope that it will rise more often than selling in the hope it falls.

However while many investors set a stop loss to limit their losses when a share falls it is unlikely that an investor will set a limit buy to order shares at a price xx% above the current price. Thus a concerted fall will trigger more automated sells than a concerted rise will trigger automated buys. Also people will sell to protect the remainder of their investment but do not always have the funds to buy when watching a share rise. This suggests the momentum of a fall should be stronger than that of a rise.

The real issue is the orchestrated attack on a share price which results in naked manipulation of the price. This is the fraud and this is where the FSA seem powerless to act. These acts make vast sums of money for the few at the expense of the many. And whilst Winter_days thinks this is basic capitalism it is really an example of fundamental fraud if the perpetrators get caught.

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock