We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Caplay | LSE:CLY | London | Ordinary Share | GB0002924651 |
Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
- |
Last Trade Time | Trade Type | Trade Size | Trade Price | Currency |
---|---|---|---|---|
- | O | 0 | 0.075 | GBX |
Caplay (CLY) Share Charts1 Year Caplay Chart |
|
1 Month Caplay Chart |
Intraday Caplay Chart |
Date | Time | Title | Posts |
---|---|---|---|
12/10/2013 | 21:40 | Caplay - About to make the WEB Talk !! | 140 |
19/6/2009 | 15:25 | PDF and Document reader added to Talklets | 15 |
26/2/2009 | 23:14 | Rumblings from Caplay | 1 |
10/2/2009 | 15:44 | Caplay with Charts & News | 9 |
24/7/2008 | 21:08 | Caplay - The start of a new era | 3,078 |
Trade Time | Trade Price | Trade Size | Trade Value | Trade Type |
---|
Top Posts |
---|
Posted at 22/6/2009 09:27 by malc5 Does anyone know or explain, what happens to any monies if CLY delists or folds? |
Posted at 20/6/2009 22:16 by bbd2 Now theres a thought. If Textic have been playing hard ball with CLY over a TO price and CLY know they would struggle to repay the loan, this could be a smart move. However, £200K is not exactly high finance and if they can't raise it from other sources, perhaps Textic are too high a risk. |
Posted at 19/6/2009 15:25 by greedy rooster Subject: Re-organisationsDate: Fri 19th Jun 2009 15:23:36 Country: UK Industry: Company: Clydeport PLC Caplay PLC - Corporate Update RNS Number : 2151U Caplay PLC 19 June 2009 Something stirring? For immediate release 19 June 2009 Caplay Plc ("Caplay" or the "Company") Corporate update As previously announced on 18 June 2008, the Company made a £200,000 loan to Textic Limited (the "Loan"), a computer software company specialising in the development, marketing and selling of text-to-speech technology for web and mobile use, and at the same time, was granted an option to acquire the entire issued share capital of Textic Limited ("Textic"). The term of the Loan is a period of twenty four months from the date of the Loan agreement (the "Loan Period") such that the Loan must be repaid on or before 17 June 2010. Caplay may at any time during the Loan Period give notice in writing to Textic that Caplay requires repayment of the Loan prior to the expiry of the Loan Period provided that the date on which the Loan is requested by Caplay to be repaid is not before the expiry of the first twelve month anniversary of the Loan, being 18 June 2009. The Loan must be repaid in full on the date on which repayment is so requsted by Caplay or if later, on the expiry of the Loan Period in 2010. The Loan is secured by a debenture over the business and assets of Textic and bears an interest rate of 10.0 per cent. per annum. Since making the Loan, the Board of Caplay has continued to review the progress that Textic is making in developing its business and has decided that it would be in the best interests of the shareholders of Caplay at this time to request repayment of the Loan. Accordingly, Caplay has submitted a request for repayment in full of the Loan. A further announcement will be made in due course. Enquires: Caplay PLC +44 (0) 207 486 8985 Tony Fabrizi, Chairman Nominated Advisor + 44 (0) 207 628 3396 Michael Cornish, Beaumont Cornish Limited ENDS This information is provided by RNS The company news service from the London Stock Exchange |
Posted at 08/4/2009 18:09 by malc5 I suppose the big question is does cly need AIM to move forward with this project, if they need extra money then I would have thought the answer must be yes in todays climate. |
Posted at 10/7/2007 11:06 by rocketron57 PTSP now at 5.5/7.0. No effect on CLY share price though. |
Posted at 04/10/2006 11:24 by bbd2 Yes I remember that from last year. There are quite a few bits on the net about Naked Shorting. Nothing to do with the company itself though other than being a victim.PVTM has moved on since then, and do seem to be forging ahead with their business model. Ramsden is the only sticking point and I think, IMHO , is the reason for the Amex delay - the yanks are quite rightly suspicious of him. I did e-mail PVTM PR people a while back asking about the listing, but the clot who replied (could have been a cleaner judging by the very dismissive and amateur reply )gave nothing away. Still feel PVTM will come good in the end and that Cly share price will respond accordingly. Time will tell and luckily I can wait. |
Posted at 06/9/2006 10:11 by bbd2 I wonder if the Patent issue has been the cause of the delayed AMEX listing ie. no Patent = no IP = no business. Perhaps listing news is finally around the corner and we can see a Whoosh in the CLY share price to reflect the value of our shares. We may also then get to know what part CLY has been pencilled in to play in the PETS revoulution ! Either way, at this price CLY is surely an attractive risk/reward punt, and those of us who have been here a while, will know how quickly she moves when she gets going. |
Posted at 28/7/2006 10:09 by tiredoldbroker So Malc5 you think it was "good business sense" for CLY's directors to sit on a holding of 722,000 PVTM shares but let options on 1.87 million PVTM shares lapse, when they could it seems have turned a profit on the options of several times the current CLY share price ? Excuse me ? The CLY options represented less than 5% of PVTM's stock, and were shares already in issue (held by Ramsden), so exercising the option would not in any way have diluted the ongoing CLY investment in PVTM. |
Posted at 28/7/2006 08:41 by tiredoldbroker I haven't bothered to keep track of Ramsden's holding in CLY but I thought he still held something like 16.7m shares or 9% of the company. Maybe someone has a more up to date figure.But the key thing is, if the CLY board are so experienced and professional and want to see CLY prosper, and if PVTM is such a brilliant idea, why have they let options over 1.87m shares at US$4 lapse, when (if the PVTM story was good) they might have been able to finance the exercise of the options one way or another and take out a profit for CLY of anything up to US$11.22m/£6.03m/alm Isn't that a major question which they should be answering ? |
Posted at 17/5/2006 09:01 by bbd2 Quite simple really. The Cly share price will not react until PVTM lists on Amex and the shares become liquid.As you rightly intimate, there is a risk that PVTM will not secure an Amex listing and this is why The City are not currently adding the value of this investment into the share price It is no different from say an oil company who is awaiting confirmation of well reserves - until proven the full value of the asset is not included in the price. The simple question here for investors is - do you think PVTM will list. If the answer is yes then expect a re-rating, if not then look elsewhere. You will also note from your research that there is a restriction on the trading of many of the PVTM shares at the moment because of the Amex listing process. |
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions