We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Burford Capital Limited | LSE:BUR | London | Ordinary Share | GG00BMGYLN96 | ORD NPV (DI) |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20.00 | 1.60% | 1,272.00 | 1,272.00 | 1,276.00 | 1,283.00 | 1,261.00 | 1,266.00 | 103,437 | 12:46:02 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unit Inv Tr, Closed-end Mgmt | 326.08M | 30.51M | 0.1393 | 91.46 | 2.79B |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
22/2/2022 18:09 | Summary judgment looks likely. Nobody has to date suggested any plausible defence. Which is why Burford could sell tranches of the case: you don't need any evidence at all to understand the legal position That's also why Argentina fought so hard on jurisdiction grounds. I think we get the judgment in June. Discussion of quantum could be separate. Or it settles before. | donald pond | |
22/2/2022 15:40 | "But we are deep into the endgam" How can this be true. Surely no summary judgement and it proceeds to trial which is going to take many more months. | loglorry1 | |
22/2/2022 15:38 | Thanks Donald. Really helpful. | jockthescot75 | |
22/2/2022 03:28 | More info. My understanding is that both sides have to file their application for summary judgment by March 31 and their reply by May 12. Then it's over to the judge. But we are deep into the endgame | donald pond | |
22/2/2022 02:57 | From £20 to now. Who is telling the rusty Spanish story? | dudishes | |
21/2/2022 13:42 | I would read that as “from 10 June”, but my Spanish is rusty | papy02 | |
21/2/2022 12:31 | Summary judgment by 10 June?https://twitter | donald pond | |
20/2/2022 10:58 | Boris sounding very tough this morning on SPV ownership My guess is that if the worst happens in Ukraine the pressure to reform will be too great | williamcooper104 | |
20/2/2022 10:42 | This is a great podcast on the economic climate generally but I was pleasantly surprised to see this global manager sing the praises of BUR at about 43/44 mins https://podcasts.app | donald pond | |
18/2/2022 16:20 | Yep, new cases will price for it Old ones will have damages based on historic events but will have the new costs of realising those historic damages It's a bit of a potential tail wind; but nothing that ought to be too concerning Higher litigation costs also beneifts litigation funding relative to law firms taking contingent fee risk, and amongst litigation funders ought to be somewhat helpful to those with larger balance sheets | williamcooper104 | |
18/2/2022 15:20 | Inflation/costs will be priced into or mitigated against in any projects going forwards, the change over the last year might have caught a lot of people out but they can't say they didn't see it coming twice. But surely with Burford they negotiate settlements towards the end, this would affect companies negotiating at the start of projects more. | planit2 | |
18/2/2022 15:09 | It ought to - disruption and dislocations in general are good for litigation The one down side is that the cost of bringing claims is soaring as lawyer labour shortfall/exploding salaries hit Though of course the value of claims rises with inflation too, albeit with a considerable time lag | williamcooper104 | |
18/2/2022 14:09 | Well I have just taken the plunge after watching this for over a year. I am hoping Covid is in the rear view mirror now and the court backlogs will clear quicker than the NHS ones. Investors are impatient and this will have been a long wait for BUR investors. 'Jam tomorrow' is an apt description of the uncertainty here. On top of this (perhaps someone can give an answer), with Covid, all the world uncertainty and a change to inflationary environment that the financial system is unprepared for, should this provide an increasing number of new claims lines that BUR can take advantage of? | planit2 | |
17/2/2022 16:27 | Maybe it's time you sold? | scubadiverr | |
17/2/2022 16:24 | So sophisticated investors lap up losses and an share price in the doldrums for 3 years? Always jam tomorrow, tiresome... | rar100 | |
16/2/2022 16:05 | Good to see BUR holding up pretty well on what at face value looked pretty disappointing results (ie loss of 70-80). I think this shows the shareholder base is becoming increasingly sophisticated and understands that profits will be lumpy and not to read too much into one single period. I'm sure if these were released a couple of years ago the share price would have tanked as clueless retail investors (not to mention some clueless institutional investors) ran for the hills. | riverman77 | |
16/2/2022 14:28 | Just seen reported from Wall Street Journal thatapparently Muddy Waters are being investigated in a probe of illegal trading tactics hxxps://www.wsj.com/ Could be interesting | dgdg1 | |
15/2/2022 13:29 | They sold half their position close to the top and then bought back in when the share price was well below NAV So I'll happily do what they do | williamcooper104 | |
15/2/2022 13:24 | Well between them Molot and Bogart already own nearly 10% of the SC, so they could hardly be accused of not having 'skin in the game'. | lomax99 | |
15/2/2022 12:26 | The proof of the pudding will be "to wait and see if Bogart and Co buy more shares with their annual bonus". | flare1 | |
15/2/2022 11:14 | Donald, Explain your comment on EPS further | three black crows | |
15/2/2022 11:14 | I'd prefer to look at 2023 anyway regardless. Some of the European waterfalls will be starting to bear fruit slightly after that as well. | this tea tastes of chicken | |
15/2/2022 10:57 | I think I've seen another EPS surge like that somewhere else but I can't remember where. That was justified by counting Petersen chickens before they're properly hatched... Absolutely possible of course as we all know but wait and see might be more sensible. Admin costs will have risen quite a bit and will lead realisations by a few years. They're been expanding staff count and also made a point not that long ago that legal salaries in law firms in general have sky rocketed over the last few years - inevitably they'll have to pay more to compete and keep/attract talent. | 1aconic |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions