ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

BMS Braemar Plc

274.50
3.00 (1.10%)
23 Apr 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Braemar Plc LSE:BMS London Ordinary Share GB0000600931 ORD 10P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  3.00 1.10% 274.50 269.00 280.00 275.00 275.00 275.00 11,958 16:35:17
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Water Transport Svcs, Nec 152.91M 4.6M 0.1396 19.70 90.54M
Braemar Plc is listed in the Water Transport Svcs sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker BMS. The last closing price for Braemar was 271.50p. Over the last year, Braemar shares have traded in a share price range of 216.00p to 310.00p.

Braemar currently has 32,925,000 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Braemar is £90.54 million. Braemar has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 19.70.

Braemar Share Discussion Threads

Showing 2201 to 2223 of 3275 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  95  94  93  92  91  90  89  88  87  86  85  84  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
25/1/2017
18:48
I have checked up, and based on a legal source, clearance to deal is required for the PDMR by an appropriate (designated) board member or designated PDMR. Also the clearance should have been denied. This appears to be a cut-and-dried failure to comply with FCA guidelines on listing rules and, if the FCA takes the issue up, could result in a sizeable fine either for poor controls or for non-adherence - this is irrespective of whether any detriment to the market or investors has occurred. Of course there is a question about whether the FCA will bother given the size of the deal, but it is definitely not OK.

ref: hxxp://uk.practicallaw.com/9-518-6569?service=ld

edmundshaw
25/1/2017
18:42
Trading statement at similar time last year so update hardly a surprise
Anyway a PMDR should ask permission
It seems he didn't and was tardy in advising the Company anyway
A call to the FD seems appropriate

phillis
25/1/2017
18:21
I would welcome some clarity from the co re this PDMR transaction 5 days before a company announcement with major share price impact, as by that point there would already be at least draft documentation in existence.
shalder
25/1/2017
17:48
Just got in and saw that RNS. Clearly it was a closed period, he knows he is a PDMR and presumably would have needed permission from the company to trade, and I can hardly believe that he was just lucky. So it looks pretty wrong to me.
edmundshaw
25/1/2017
13:52
Interesting RNS just out. Alongside the director buying I see Kevin Gorman (MD at Cory Shipping) sold £47,000 of shares at 306p on 18th January - just 3 working days before Monday's disastrous trading update.

He's evidently a very perceptive - or lucky - guy.

EDIT - sorry speedsgh, posts crossed!

rivaldo
25/1/2017
13:48
CEO & a NED dipping into their own pockets. Relatively small amounts (£39.5k & £49.8k) so not taking too much comfort from it. They were bought yesterday at 249p.

Also slipped in at the end of the rns is notification that a PDMR sold just under £47k worth at 306p on 18 Jan. Trading Update was released on 23 Jan so would seem rather fortuitous timing! How that isn't insider trading I don't know. Not impressed!

Director/PDMR Shareholding -

speedsgh
24/1/2017
19:03
I agree. 14p seems to be the consensus view. Obviously depends on trading in FY18 but they have a very robust balance sheet.
topvest
24/1/2017
14:43
The clue is in the trading statement where it says:

"The Board's intention for the medium and longer term is to pay a dividend appropriately covered by earnings from underlying operations."

That covers the Board's back, though is slightly ambiguous with the words "appropriately covered by earnings" - is that covered once, 1.5 times or what?

However, IMO the Board wouldn't have given the indication of a cut to a 14p dividend this year, only to cut it again next year. So, guess that Edison have it about right predicting the same for next year.

grahamburn
24/1/2017
12:16
Agree with all of that.
shalder
24/1/2017
11:33
I am not expecting a dividend at 26p any time soon either. Just think that reducing the dividend to around 13p-15p is enough provided markets recover through the cycle. That is what Edison are indicating, and their information should be more based on some contact with management. But they have left themselves wiggle room in case conditions continues to be tough, and obviously they would not want to have to make a further cut.
edmundshaw
24/1/2017
10:39
shalder i don't think it is a forgone conclusion in either direction, it will depend on how trading goes over the next 6-12 months. Obvious but true.
spooky
24/1/2017
10:37
But the comments re dividend are well founded imo. The total payment of 26p has not been properly supported by eps for several years, so in a sense current trading has forced an overdue bod decision. Now they have bitten the bullet, that rebasing is not going to be reversed in a hurry, so expectations that the annual total divi will quickly bounce back are misplaced. All dyor!
shalder
24/1/2017
10:00
You are just too naive Edmund

The decision on dividends is one of the most important BODs make and a lot of thought goes into it (and the message it sends)
Companies don't lower and then raise their dividends willy nilly
The final divi will have been announced with due insight and consideration of the following year's final from which it will be anticipated to make a small increment

You surely dont expect a final of 5p and then a similar next interim with a bigger next final

Grow up
The dividend has now been rebased

phillis
24/1/2017
09:46
Phillis, talking about a 1.5p interim dividend is just silly. No-one is going to believe that, and you are not going to push the price down by saying it.

My expectation is for a 5p interim and perhaps a 10p final if conditions do not deteriorate further. They are already pretty bad, so that would be disappointing in the short term, but medium to long term this stock and it's dividend can be expected to recover.

edmundshaw
24/1/2017
08:21
Update from Edison(may require registration):-
cwa1
23/1/2017
20:44
BMS has been on my watch list for years. Like topvest mentions above, a watching brief to see how the price moves over the next few weeks would be sensible. A reduction to £2 and I buy my first tranche.

Shipping is a very cyclical sector, with the current times being not far from the bottom I feel. Increasing oil prices and growing US and Asia economies being significant factors.

haywards26
23/1/2017
18:22
It's not quite that straightforward. The core business is worth more than the market capitalisation. Tempted to await the results and double-up on signs of stabilisation in technical services. Best not to buy until 6m after a profit warning. 12m is probably optimal, but will reassess when we get some financials and an outlook statement.
topvest
23/1/2017
16:29
As expected, divi cut.
PE still around 25 so overpriced IMHO

freddie ferret
23/1/2017
16:13
final dividend is 5p
next interim likely 1.5 to 2p until business kicks up - if it ever does

This is the BOD signalling the future

phillis
23/1/2017
15:59
For those who are satisfied with a 50% capital reduction per anumn this has certainly been the share to be in. Going folward good luck to all holders I think you are going to need it.
3800

3800
23/1/2017
14:17
Phillis, by not being explicit they have given themselves the latitude to have the full year dividend at around 8p, though they did say the full year dividend would be 14p, which might be regarded as a more likely guide. But what they actually said explicitly is the intention for the medium and longer term is to pay a dividend appropriately covered by earnings from underlying operations. Which means no particular number, just a fairly fixed ratio of earnings.
edmundshaw
23/1/2017
14:16
No mention of the dollar hedge in the money. Have I misunderstood this or is there a windfall awaiting?
8w
23/1/2017
12:58
can anyone clarify if BMS is still commited to oil services activities ? the rns was not clear in this regard (drastic cost cuts) and this was a key reason for me to buy as a recovery stock. Thanks Philip
pbutterworth1
Chat Pages: Latest  95  94  93  92  91  90  89  88  87  86  85  84  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock