ADVFN Logo

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for alerts Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers

BNN Bnn Technology

42.00
0.00 (0.00%)
28 Mar 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Bnn Technology LSE:BNN London Ordinary Share GB00BNBNSF91 ORD 10P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 42.00 41.00 42.00 - 0.00 00:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

BNN Technology Share Discussion Threads

Showing 10551 to 10571 of 21600 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  432  431  430  429  428  427  426  425  424  423  422  421  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
03/6/2018
21:14
Any one else who emailed last week for a update didnt get a reply
May be we will see news this week.

genises
02/6/2018
20:13
and11 29 May '18 - 15:38 - 10538 of 10580
0 0 0
Does sound a bit odd!could be Kite 🤡🤡🤡

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

You cast doubts, but I wouldn't say you rubbished chinamessenger. Next!

papillon
02/6/2018
14:32
Pap! My comments rubbished this poster, so what are you on about....next.
and11
02/6/2018
12:23
Good point about CTAG, Andy. and11 states "I hadn’t realised that anyone had believed This new poster". However and11 never "rubbished" chinamessenger when he/she started posting. I believe chinamessenger would have been "rubbished" straight away by the likes of and11 if he/she had posted bearishly on the state of Chinese operation instead of bullishly!! :-)
papillon
02/6/2018
10:31
papillon,

Yes very pertinent comments there, IMO.


Just before the CTAG EGM (held in Jersey at 08.30 am!) an CTAG Action Group was formed and had a lot of shares in backing.

I suggested one of the group should attend and call for a poll on the voting, and then one new poster appeared on LSE Chat saying a poll was guaranteed and there was no need to attend.

As much as we suggested someone attending with a proxy was essential, he would come back with reasons why it was not, so nobody went.


No poll was called, so it went through on a show of hands, and where is CTAG now?

Funnily enough said poster has vanished too!

andy
01/6/2018
15:45
Pap! I hadn’t realised that anyone had believed This new poster...just seems a little odd to me...come on BNN update us with something, as has been promised, via many sources including my own...good weekend to all!
and11
01/6/2018
12:00
chinamessenger? Joined advfn just 3 days ago on Tuesday. Made 4 posts so far all on BNN. Gives the impression he's a BNN "insider" working in Beijing.

Is he genuine? Unlikely. In my experience posters such as chinamessenger can pop up on these bb's and invariably turn out to be Walter Mitty fantasists telling porkies. However the "believers" lap up what they post as though it's verified fact. Clutching at straws? Yes!

papillon
31/5/2018
22:02
Hi China
Kite has the answers to your questions .

delboy39
31/5/2018
21:39
Hi Team BNN
Any news? Who is Michael?
We at New Net are waiting.

chinamessenger
31/5/2018
21:26
The Bulls and Michael Walters need to review their past calls on BNN.


The Past is often an indicator of the future. Those who forget the past are condemned to repeat it

pj 1
31/5/2018
20:21
Clarification since a few are wondering what I was meaning. MW checked himself from his source i.e direct was meant to mean MW did it himself. For those who subscribe, it is more clear when reading MWs 25th May post on his BB. For those who don't subscribe, keep guessing.
perfect choice
31/5/2018
20:18
Michael Walters is lying with his recent comments.
highasakite
31/5/2018
19:59
biro,

Was Gordon Bennett the connection?

At the end of the day the company is the source of all information, if they are feeding Michael Walters but not the shareholders, that is clearly wrong, IMO.


Why tell Michael to tell you?

Why can't they tell you directly?

Accountability perhaps?

andy
31/5/2018
19:53
Biro .

I agree a couple of others could join Kite at that clinic

delboy39
31/5/2018
19:01
Gordon Bennet.........
birotop
31/5/2018
18:19
mlf51 31 May '18 - 16:14 - 10561 of 10565

Who said he communicated with the company?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I believe Perfect Choice did if his post is anything to go by.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Perfect Choice 31 May '18 - 14:35 - 10558 of 10565

Yep mlf51, at least Mike has been able to directly check.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Surely being "able to directly check" means MW has communicated directly with the company, or communicated with someone in direct communication with the company? If that is incorrect then Perfect Choice's post is misleading.

papillon
31/5/2018
17:45
mlf5131 May '18 - 16:14 - 10561 of 10564


Who said he communicated with the company?

-------

OK are you suggesting he just made it up?

andy
31/5/2018
16:54
Clinic definitely for you! 😂😂😂
and11
31/5/2018
15:43
“Exposed as a crook” really kite! Where is it stated that as CEO or board director of BNN? Please go to the clinic that you had suggested you needed to go too."



and11

I am talking about Mercer you idiot.

highasakite
31/5/2018
15:14
Who said he communicated with the company?
mlf51
31/5/2018
14:42
mLF51,


It's such a shame that Mike Walters can communicate with the company, yet the company refuses to engage with the owners of the company, the shareholders!


And the statement made seems appropriately vague.

andy
Chat Pages: Latest  432  431  430  429  428  427  426  425  424  423  422  421  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock