We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bluejay Mining Plc | LSE:JAY | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BFD3VF20 | ORD 0.01P |
| Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.31 | 15,597,854 | 08:07:00 |
| Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.30 | 0.32 | 0.315 | 0.31 | 0.315 | |
| Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metal Mining Services | 1.67M | 0.0014 | 2.21 | 3.71M |
| Last Trade Time | Trade Type | Trade Size | Trade Price | Currency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09:21:01 | O | 308,204 | 0.3011 | GBX |
| Date | Time | Source | Headline |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19/4/2024 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Bluejay Mining PLC Expansion of Corporate Strategy |
| 16/4/2024 | 20:16 | ALNC |  TRADING UPDATES: Nexteq confident of meeting full-year expectations |
| 16/4/2024 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Bluejay Mining PLC Dundas Ilmenite Resource Update |
| 05/4/2024 | 17:04 | UK RNS | Bluejay Mining PLC Holding(s) in Company |
| 05/4/2024 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Bluejay Mining PLC Issue of Options |
| 02/4/2024 | 19:02 | ALNC | TRADING UPDATES: Roadside shares suspended; Adnams looks for funds |
| 02/4/2024 | 13:35 | UK RNS | Bluejay Mining PLC Change to OTCQB Listing |
| 12/2/2024 | 17:32 | ALNC | Bluejay Mining cuts 80% of workforce in cost saving drive |
| 12/2/2024 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Bluejay Mining PLC Cost Reductions and Leadership Adjustments |
| 09/2/2024 | 14:29 | ALNC | IN BRIEF: Bluejay Mining fires Exploration VP for gross misconduct |
Bluejay Mining (JAY) Share Charts1 Year Bluejay Mining Chart |
|
1 Month Bluejay Mining Chart |
Intraday Bluejay Mining Chart |
| Date | Time | Title | Posts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18/4/2024 | 09:19 | BlueJay. Pituffik Superstar | 12,217 |
| 17/7/2023 | 10:22 | BLUEJAY - Into production | 23 |
| 12/8/2021 | 08:12 | jay | 12 |
| Trade Time | Trade Price | Trade Size | Trade Value | Trade Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08:21:02 | 0.30 | 308,204 | 928.00 | O |
| 07:07:00 | 0.32 | 800 | 2.56 | O |
| 07:07:00 | 0.32 | 562 | 1.80 | O |
| 07:07:00 | 0.32 | 625 | 2.00 | O |
| 07:07:00 | 0.32 | 1,500 | 4.80 | O |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 16/2/2024 16:27 by kenmitch Hi fleuryp.I’m not intending to post here again,but want to reply to your post. I really hoped Reddit would work well, but doubted it would simply because nearly all the people who signed up for it were people who never posted on Mike’s site. Ideally it needed both those who posted on blue sky mainly AND those who mainly posted on BARG type shares to join as well for Reddit to work, but unfortunately most of those didn’t. The inevitable result was hardly any posts. Had only blue sky/speculative posters signed up it would have worked, as it would if only those favouring quality had. I am going to do a KITE post soon as number33 is keen to keep that portfolio alive going. I realise I offend you but enjoyed your posts. I realise this is off topic BUT there are now very few left posting on JAY. There have only been 67 posts on this thread this year and some of those are me misbehaving and the same with the similarly off topic aggressive replies! It’s inevitable that previous fans have moved on and perhaps many after losing heavily now that JAY has fallen so far. How different it is to 2018 when JAY was over 20p and expectations were SO high. e.g like this one from big fan then Monts. Who would have thought for a moment then that DUNDAS would end up being abandoned? monts1216 Feb '18 - 13:35 - 2516 of 12183 0 0 0 Herder I agree it would be better to get to big production in a few years and receive some lovely dividends but I believe that it won't come to pass as there are too many hungry eyes on JAY's Dundas asset, which is sure to be gobbled up by a bigger company well before that stage” Good luck and good health fleuryp, and hope you find some big winning horses too. |
Posted at 15/2/2024 09:45 by archie222 Ken's message has been consistent now for quite some time. We're talking years & its been consistently downbeat.Although I'm not a "Ken" fan - in terms of the share price and jay's failure to deliver any significant benefit to its shareholders he has been proved right. This of course, has been in the face of the usual non-stop ramping. Just look at the share price graph. After all the shareholders money that has been used and desperation raises I hope they do pull something out of the fire. All jays eggs seem to now be in the Disko basket & if Kobold decide to walk away they will still own 49% of the project. |
Posted at 14/2/2024 19:51 by kenmitch Those ramping JAY were “seeing value now” when the shares were as high as 25p and “saw value” all the way down to the current disastrous share price. It’s incompetence on a grand scale! They were, and a few still are, oblivious to the obvious all the way down to zero. JAY is nearly there now. |
Posted at 31/1/2024 13:24 by monet Will JAY share price do a HE1 when we get some news? |
Posted at 24/1/2024 13:04 by squiresquire Count...Thanks for those, good stuff.I dont think we will have a very long time to wait before news giving us a better idea of forward intentions from both the Kobold perspective as well as from JAYS. The split of 51 - 49 rather gives the impression that Kobold only want to be bothered with Disko and its relevance orr potential relevance to energy needs in the future. There is no doubt Ni has been hammered by the general market decline in Industrial use, certainly stockpiles, China's current relapse and Indonesia's cheaper product which is grabbing the market share these days. Disko though isnt about money today or tomorrow for Kobold, its about hiving off a vast resource, wherever they find it, for the future and creating a huge conglomerate that owns a large chunk of Strategic Mineral across the globe. Bezos and Gates both think Globally and Futuristically. Good luck to them i say. However now that R M is back in the frame, and they, as in Kobold, would certainly have had a say in that with their 51%, we may well get back to work soon and see more than just vapid promises. Covid has definitely screwed us about but ime pretty certain the cards are being re dealt from the pressures of nothing happening which has been the only constant in the last few years. Awful really how the potential has been sitting there undrilled all this time, anyway we are where we are as they say. Its now up to the nwe buys, or returning boys, to analyse the best way forward that slots into Kobolds aims as well as JAYs. They have a bit more liquid dosh now, hopefully we will learn how they intend to spend it sooner than later. It would also be very nice to see some of the deadwood that JAY has been paying for, cut out and some people who get their hands dirty with drilling bits and pieces taking over from the theorists. The other day i asked you if you were aware of any particular information regarding the Ni Cu deposits. I had understood that at some point in the distant past volcanic activity had created a particularly nice 'haven' for the metalic substances that had congomerated if thats the word in large high content areas. I think its that occurrence that Kobold are looking for. For the life of me i cannot find the original article / podcast i got the information from but i am certain Kobold see the Disko model as being attractive enough to spend a lot of millions on. JAY also has its other interests in Gold Silver etc that they may sell off or farm out. We do need to hear more about these interests as some money is for sure sitting out there for JAY to tap. Lets see what next month brings, i say next month as then RM and his BOD along with Kobold, will have had tome to review and re-plan events to come, Dundas has been written off in some sense by the last RNS but that just doesnt wash as the work to define the original RNSs giving Dundas qualities and quantities, was NEVER to my knowledge superseded by any study that could be called comprehensive. When they released the RNS saying they were mothballng Dundas due to new information showing Dundas to be less than originally though i simply didnt believe it. My take is to wait until end of February to see what the new set up at both Kobold and JAY are now intending. They themselves must be desparate to get on with things especially after all the Covid interuption. |
Posted at 12/1/2024 11:46 by squiresquire 07/12/2023 1:45pmUK Regulatory (RNS & others) TIDMJAY RNS Number : 0733W Bluejay Mining PLC 07 December 2023 TR-1: NOTIFICATION OF MAJOR INTEREST IN SHARES(i) -------------------- 1. Identity of the issuer or the underlying Bluejay Mining plc issuer of existing shares to which voting rights are attached: (ii) -------------------- 2 Reason for the notification (please tick the appropriate box or boxes): An acquisition or disposal of voting rights x -------------------- An acquisition or disposal of qualifying financial instruments which may result in the acquisition of shares already issued to which voting rights are attached -------------------- An acquisition or disposal of instruments with similar economic effect to qualifying financial instruments -------------------- An event changing the breakdown of voting rights -------------------- Other (please specify): ------------------ -------------------- 3. Full name of person(s) subject Roderick Claude McIllree to the notification obligation: (iii) -------------------- 4. Full name of shareholder(s) (if different from 3.):(iv) -------------------- 5. Date of the transaction and 6(th) September 2022 date on which the threshold is crossed or reached: (v) -------------------- 6. Date on which issuer notified: 7(th) December 2023 -------------------- 7. Threshold(s) that is/are crossed Sold below the 3% threshold or reached: (vi, vii) -------------------- 8. Notified details: A: Voting rights attached to shares (viii, ix) Class/type Situation previous Resulting situation after the triggering of to the triggering transaction shares transaction if possible using the ISIN CODE -------------------- Number Number Number Number of voting % of voting rights of of of shares rights (x) Shares Voting Rights --------------- ------------------ ----------- -------------------- Direct Direct Indirect Direct Indirect (xi) (xii) ------ ------- ------ ------ ----------- ------------- --------- ------------- ------------ Fully paid shares JAY.LON 75,820,635 75,820,635 30,030,386 30,030,386 <3% --------------- ------------------ ----------- ------------- --------- ------------- ------------ B: Qualifying Financial Instruments Resulting situation after the triggering transaction Type of financial Expiration Exercise/ Number of voting % of voting instrument date (xiii) Conversion Period rights that may rights (xiv) be acquired if the instrument is exercised/ converted. --------------- -------------------- C: Financial Instruments with similar economic effect to Qualifying Financial Instruments (xv, xvi) Resulting situation after the triggering transaction Type of Exercise Expiration Exercise/ Number of voting % of voting financial price date (xvii) Conversion rights instrument rights (xix, instrument period refers to xx) (xviii) --------------- -------------- --------------- -------------------- Nominal Delta --------------- -------------- --------------- -------------------- Total (A+B+C) Number of voting rights Percentage of voting rights -------------------- 30,030,386 <3% -------------------- 9. Chain of controlled undertakings through which the voting rights and/or the financial instruments are effectively held, if applicable: (xxi) Proxy Voting: 10. Name of the proxy holder: -------------------- 11. Number of voting rights proxy holder will cease to hold: -------------------- 12. Date on which proxy holder will cease to hold voting rights: -------------------- 13. Additional information: 14. Contact name: Roderick McIllree -------------------- 15. Contact telephone number: rod@greenlandoil.com -------------------- This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact rns@lseg.com or visit www.rns.com. RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services. For further information about how RNS and the London Stock Exchange use the personal data you provide us, please see our Privacy Policy. END HOLEADAXEDADFFA (END) Dow Jones Newswires December 07, 2023 08:45 ET (13:45 GMT) Bluejay Mining Share Price Today Bluejay Mining Share Price Chart Bluejay Mining Share Chat Bluejay Mining News Bluejay Mining Share Price History Bluejay Mining Financials Bluejay Mining Trades Bluejay Mining Level 2 Add Bluejay Mining to Watchlist Add Bluejay Mining to your Portfolio Bluejay Mining Share Price Alert |
Posted at 22/12/2023 09:33 by squiresquire Count..Nice one, i have no doubt JAY have got Rod M back to use his Geological, Greenland and Bluejay knowledge to help them get on with Disko and JAYs other assets. Ime still buying at this price, its just too good to miss. Time will tell and nothing is ever nailed on but JAYs assets in ground are pretty much beyond dispute after 100 years or so of Geological reports from Disko and the other areas of interest to us. I look forward to the Share Price recovery this coming year. |
Posted at 21/12/2023 10:20 by kenmitch Complete rubbish as usual squiresquire. I did not hold Sirius Minerals shares (except for one profitable trade ahead of getting approval) and posted that it was a great project (it still is and now being brought to fruition as one of the biggest ever European Mining projects by Anglo American) but not a share to invest in.You shamelessly ramped JAY time and time again, describing Rod M as a genius etc etc and told investors of the great profits you had made.The ramps often included that you had just bought more shares. No doubt people persuaded by your nonsense went on to buy too and lift the share price temporarily . That way a ramper can make profits if enough trust that poster. You did the same with so many other disastrous shares too. What about your enthusiasm for Vast for starters! Simple fact is that you promoted and are still promoting a share that has fallen 98% and the great Dundas project you raved about is now ashes. You also were so clueless that you once expressed surprise that shares paying a dividend could go up in price. |
Posted at 20/12/2023 16:16 by kenmitch I agree with that comment BUT it’s also the case that too many investors rely on “trusted posters” and commentators, and the garbage spouted by the likes of Rod M in on line interviews, instead of researching properly. That includes NO thorough checking of previous update comments to see if JAY had under promised and over delivered or the opposite.I held a small JAY stake years ago with that buy decision based on almost 100% ultra bullish comment on another website. It was only when I couldn’t fathom why, if all was so good, the share price had fallen heavily. It only took around 15 minutes of checking past updates to discover that JAY had way over promised and way underdelivered. I posted to point that out with specific examples of the most extreme falsehoods, but as it always does with over hyped rubbish shares like JAY, it fell on VERY deaf ears. |
Posted at 22/7/2023 18:10 by perfect choice Hi All, I can see a few posts enquiring on my whereabouts and possible identity.First thing to say I'm definitely NOT Kevin Sheil, I am a PI like virtually everybody else here I expect. I've also never been to a JAY AGM so it couldn't have been me you met sammy. In terms of JAY I sold my entire holding back on the 17th February at an average just above 4p. This was after reading the "new" strategic review issued on the 14th February. Bottom line is that I disagree with the strategy which in effects pursues all prospects JAY have, which ultimately will be highly dilutive either as a greater number of shares issued (if they can do more equity placings at this low price), or by reducing their own holdings of their prospects by bringing in partners to do the further exploration work JAY cannot fund themselves. So looking at their current prospects, these are my views now. On Dundas, I have suspicions that there is more drilling needed before they can get to a DFS and actually progression of construction. I am aware of a comment made at the 30th June AGM to an individual saying the issue with Dundas is quality (either Ilmenite grade or depth , don't know specifically). The drilling done in 2022 hasn't resolved that otherwise why still mention now? I feel there is more spend to come which JAY don't have the cash for, so a potential partnership to progress if a partner wants to (but financial viability now a question due to "reliability" and lower price of Ilmenite versus price when PFS was issued). However a partner means giving up some or most of JAYs 100% ownership; I would expect at least 50% to be earned by the partner if not more even if Dundas remains viable. I should also point out that JAY have not achieved one of the conditions of the exploitation licence. The exploitation licence is subject to the conditions stated in 4.02 of the licence namely: (a) Exploitation and Closure Plan – which JAY has done (b) Provision of Financial Security and company guarantee required by 30th June 2023 (c) Commence exploitation of minerals under the licence by 31st December 2025. So on (b) we have heard nothing and the date has passed. Also (c) is at clear risk since would require construction to commence next year (2 summer seasons required), but if further work is required to validate the resource more, then that will not be the case. So at the very least the exploitation licence terms will have to be extended otherwise JAY will lose its licence. Don't expect that but do expect a further delay and extension of those dates above. Moving onto Disko, KoBold have an obligation to spend a minimum amount of money or complete 15 drills by end 2024. But I feel myself Disko being "deep and complex" (comment made by RE in an interview) is no longer a high priority prospect for KoBold. While Disko is still on their list of prospects, all their current promotion of projects are with targets in Canada, Australia and Zambia. They simply have higher priority and more prospective targets right now to progress. So I either see KoBold will complete their obligation or extend it with JAY. But even if they complete their obligation, just 15 holes drilled are just discovery work and much more to be done to even get to an initial JORC compliant first resource estimate. So how does JAY pay for that follow-on work. Another partner introduction? The same applies for other JAY prospects and that includes Kangerluarsuk where I see a partner appearing as well with earn-in rights maybe to take JAYs ultimate holding down to 25-30% like in Finland. So this all reflects the new strategy as it appears to me and a high risk of reduction in holdings of projects JAY has. They are becoming an exploration services company for the majors IMHO and will earn their income from that, with the hope of a small percentage holding of the eventual producing mines if successful. But bearing in mind there are already 1Bn shares issued and outside of Dundas, we are still talking of 8-10 years lifecycles for new operating mines in Greenland (brownfield targets in Finland may well be shorter), its just not what I would invest in. My original investment plan was for Dundas to remain 100% owned and get to operation to generate cash funding for the other major prospects JAY has (in a geology sense, they are still good prospects except a risk on Dundas now as stated above). That opportunity has gone and the share price has collapsed as a result. so as a result I sold in February. Good luck to those who hold, I hopes something allows you to get some of your money back but I fear a long path to go and reduced holdings by JAY as the result of these new partners they are now pursuing, which is the result of not being able to progress themselves any longer. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
