Share Name |
Share Symbol |
Market |
Type |
Share ISIN |
Share Description |
Bisichi Plc |
LSE:BISI |
London |
Ordinary Share |
GB0001012045 |
ORD 10P |
|
Price Change |
% Change |
Share Price |
Bid Price |
Offer Price |
High Price |
Low Price |
Open Price |
Shares Traded |
Last Trade |
|
0.00 |
0.0% |
80.00 |
75.00 |
85.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
51 |
00:00:00 |
Industry Sector |
Turnover (m) |
Profit (m) |
EPS - Basic |
PE Ratio |
Market Cap (m) |
Mining |
48.1 |
3.0 |
9.8 |
8.2 |
8 |
Bisichi Share Discussion Threads

Showing 651 to 672 of 775 messages
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|
29/1/2018 09:46 | This lot should be making serious money now if they have got the stone issues sorted out. Look at the graph on the Richards Bay coal price below!;
https://www.theice.com/products/241/API4-Richards-Bay-Coal-Futures/data |  callumross | |
09/9/2017 08:25 | HNR -
TWO wells successfully drilled with abundant oil and gas in samples extracted!
Fracking and FIRST OIL next month!
Don't miss this train! |  happyholder123 | |
08/1/2017 16:46 | LOL - I suspect its already happened. Almost time to get out of this dog once commodity prices have a mini-top. |  topvest | |
08/1/2017 16:41 | with the drop in sterling mr h needs a big payrise this year to make ends meet. |  bisiboy | |
29/10/2016 09:42 | any chance of a dividend increase rather than a bonus increase for mr h? |  bisiboy | |
25/10/2016 09:31 | https://www.ft.com/content/a71cc96c-dcba-3e53-8a87-caf8be075ae6 |  callumross | |
25/10/2016 09:28 | Looks like the market may be waking up to recent coal price - exchange rate developments! |  callumross | |
25/10/2016 08:52 | Almost no stock available to trade at this level. Would expect the NAV to be comfortably exceeded before it becomes a little more liquid. |  my retirement fund | |
25/10/2016 08:43 | Indeed they are - perhaps they will be subjected at some stage in the future to Mrs May and her cohorts reterict of corporate governance reforms.But yes this is clearly a golden time for their coal mining businesses and the currencies all mean that they have never had it so good. What's more it looks more like a permanent development. |  my retirement fund | |
25/10/2016 08:35 | Not just that - BISI must be coining it in with the favourable exchange rate movements in the £ / $ / rand rate. Plus £1.20 per share in UK property assets and £1.50 NAV overall. Board still taking too much out of this company, though! |  callumross | |
25/10/2016 08:25 | I take it everyone knows about the doubling of price of high grade coal and shortage of coking coal and the cut backs in Chinese production in the last few weeks ? |  my retirement fund | |
27/8/2016 12:57 | They do seem well remunerated! Anyway, £15.9m net assets, up from £15.6m at the year end equates to £1.48 per share and property assets alone are £1.20 per share. |  callumross | |
27/8/2016 09:09 | PROFITS WOULD BE TREBLE THOSE REPORTED IF HELLER DIDN'T TAKE £1M YEAR FROM THE COMPANY. GF |  ntv | |
19/8/2016 19:18 | Ticking up nicely. One of the beneficiaries from Brexit I guess through the exchange rate gains for the colliery as result of cable depreciation. |  callumross | |
15/5/2016 18:16 | me too see Mr H has managed to payback 15k of the loan. |  bisiboy | |
30/4/2016 12:28 | Yes, £1,576k of directors' emoluments versus £427k annual dividend says it all. Average salary cost for the workers is £24k even including the director excesses. I will vote against most of the resolutions, not that it will make any difference. |  topvest | |
23/2/2016 16:03 | Desperately needs some corporate action. A white knight to boot out the exceptionally greedy BoD, and either spin off, or sell off, the UK property portfolio (by itself worth around 100p per share). |  bozzy_s | |
23/2/2016 15:57 | These would be trading at 300p+ if it weren't for the ridiculous directors salaries.
If they earned a more reasonable £500,000 per year between them (still a little high perhaps), the dividend could be increased to around 11p per share. 2014 earnings would have been approx 20p per share. A share price of 300p would represent a P/E of 15, a yield of nearly 4%, and be underpinned by net tangible assets of 150p per share.
They've obviously done the maths and decided that paying themselves a fortune makes them better off than paying themselves a fair amount and seeing the subsequent increase in the value of their shares.
Haven't looked into their individual shareholdings, but I'd have thought if they own say 50% of the company, then surely they'd be better off earning a reasonable/fair amount and seeing the value of their shares increase by £10m - £15m? |  bozzy_s | |
14/5/2015 19:42 | a certain director creamed off nearly a £1m. that is 10% of the mkt cap. that means one director of BP could take £14bn. that is 10% as well!! wholly unacceptable and just pure greed in my opinion. but wtfdik |  ntv | |
09/5/2015 14:07 | £1.495m of directors' remuneration versus £1.160m last year. The dividend costs £0.43m and has been maintained ---- say's it all really! |  topvest | |
01/5/2015 17:22 | clearly not in fact quite the reverse.
still i am sure shareholders are quite happy for all the extra profits to be
spent on pay rises rather than dividend increases! |  bisiboy | |
23/4/2014 19:34 | £614k for the MD and £425k to shareholders in dividends says it all. Surely £614k in South Africa = a ludicrous salary and very high living standard. Not sure how he gets away with it given the employees are on such a low salary. More and more money for poor financial performance. This company could have distributed twice as much to shareholders over the last five years if we didn't have such a self serving bunch in charge. |  topvest | |