Baylon Hldgs Share Discussion Threads

[double6] 28/9/2009 13:12

(2 x 500k trades just gone through)

[double6] 28/9/2009 13:05

Big disposal a few days back will be covered shortly - expecting a tick up after a couple more buys IMHO

[mister md] 28/9/2009 13:04

plenty of buys going through via PLUS too

[double6] 28/9/2009 12:57

TDW now quoting touch price to buy.

[double6] 28/9/2009 12:38

Lots of buys going through this morning - pressure on the spread ??

[pre] 28/9/2009 08:13

indeed D6...looks like we could see a recovery here...

[double6] 25/9/2009 13:56

Few buys coming through now....

[double6] 25/9/2009 13:19

Bought a few - MC around £1.3mln - Cash at Dec = £2.9mln.

Recent RNS confirmed low cash burn, with sufficient funds.

Looks like the big sell brought it down.

Interesting....

[double6] 25/9/2009 11:11

Big buys and sells gone through over last few days - another delayed one to show this morning ??

Any thoughts ??

[pre] 30/6/2009 12:20

indeed..more good news..

[discoverytim] 30/6/2009 08:30

This still looks good one with some way to go up yet.

Financials having been released today and a market cap at 2.9m, with 5 1/4m total assests, 1/2m liabilities and NET assests of 4.5m of which 2.9m is cash.

So we've got operating capital, interest in franchising recyling centres, and still money for future investments having now acquired 100% of Molectra.

Should be a wave worth riding. aimho of course

[egoi] 20/5/2009 08:19

I wouldn't bother after this........... Lost the two contracts it had, incurred significant costs into the bargain and only cash to keep going for the time being. Doesn't get much worse imho amd also imho no amount of mirror talk likely to convince investors otherwise.

Hard lines folks! -:(((

Molectra regrets to report the two value added product ('VAP') contracts previously announced; equine anti-cast products (March 2008) and automotive accessory products (June 2008) are now non-performing. Minimal revenue was generated from the contracts, although the Company has incurred significant operating and capital costs. Despite ongoing attempts to make the contracts commercial, a combination of contract-specific problems and global economic conditions has meant this has not been possible.


As a result, Molectra currently has no material active contracts but is actively following new commercial opportunities for other VAP's within a variety of sectors in Australia.


With a low annual cash consumption and cash in the bank, the Directors are comfortable that the Company currently has sufficient cash resources to cover its current requirements.

[monis] 13/5/2009 08:35

Certainly are, I think we need a new thread, are you any good at that sort of thing?

[pre] 13/5/2009 08:31

doesn't take a lot to shift this north.....we're off again

[monis] 06/5/2009 10:22

Does anybody want to set up a new and accurate thread for the company Molectra Group?

[monis] 05/5/2009 10:25

They trade on aim anyway.

[monis] 05/5/2009 10:18

nice post you obviously failed to see the 800,000 buy last week after the conference. imo.

good luck to you too.

[elcricimes] 05/5/2009 10:09

You;re getting desperate now lads. Only green newbies are going to follow this ramping drivel. It is all so obvious when one of you keeps throwing in negative comments. You really should change your mode of operation.

Has nobody told you that Plus is finished.
Keep it up lads.

imo lmao

[monis] 05/5/2009 08:50

pre- do you set up threads?

[monis] 05/5/2009 08:12

Some seem to be confused with the name of the thread.

[pre] 05/5/2009 08:10

indeed Monis....we could see big rise today...

[monis] 05/5/2009 07:35

Big rise today imo , dyor.

[pre] 04/5/2009 19:23

'MOLE' looks well undervalued as you've rightly identified Monis.....we should see some significant buying interest tomorrow....no stamp duty to pay either...so a nice bonus:-)

[monis] 04/5/2009 14:45

I think the key thing is the share price rise just after the conference in Melbourne imo. They are also undervalued on cash alone imo pending update. imo dyor.

[monis] 04/5/2009 14:42

Not personally into starting threads. If anyone else wants to, I agree that would probably be useful.

I think this was used on Friday because there was no other thread set up.