We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Base Resources Limited | LSE:BSE | London | Ordinary Share | AU000000BSE5 | ORD NPV (DI) |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 5.875 | 5.75 | 6.00 | 5.875 | 5.875 | 5.88 | 10,968 | 08:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Iron Ores | 271.43M | -4.84M | -0.0041 | -26.83 | 129.8M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
28/5/2001 15:38 | The Mail, huh...oh well I can't argue with the quality press, eh. uurrrhhh... [The FT is the only remaining source of semi-intelligent news reporting, and even then I am more than a little uncomfortable that so many ex-ft jouranlists are on the New-labour pay-roll as "consultants". You're being brain-washed - successfully and skillfully.] A little ignorance is a dangerous thing; a lot is just a tragic thing. IMHO. | peterreidsmith | |
28/5/2001 15:32 | prs, you missed out your Holy grail,,, The Mail.. From todays tory holy grail.., "AFTER 11.1/2 yrs Under Thatcher Inflation was 10%................. Interest rates 14%................. Unemployment 8.5%................ Economic growth at MINUS - 1%...........Now 2.5%" I would mention mad major but that's pushing credibility to the limit. Don't mention the FT either they're the same, and I was'nt brainwashed, as i was after all, there at the time. The papers do print the truth sometimes, personally i'd have been quite happy to retire on a 15% annuity, instead of 6%. | i rely on balls | |
28/5/2001 14:08 | You rely on the Sun. And TV. And Balls. | peterreidsmith | |
28/5/2001 13:31 | I agree, the Conservatory party were far more efficient, just look at how they improved the Railways, the NHS, DHSS, etc. They were all grotty, poorly run, inefficient money pits, and when they left office they were all 10 times worse, until newlab took up the flag, now they're only 9 times worse, still after another 5 years, who knows.. | i rely on balls | |
28/5/2001 13:22 | Good example, thanks: remember when it used to be "the Conservative" party...now it's "Tory" - even the press now say Tory. Amazingly subtle isn't it, but then that's (in this case negative) marketing for you. Sorry, your question: they did a more competent job. (And before everyone goes what about "boom and bust" etc...please don't, it would be just too, too sad). | peterreidsmith | |
28/5/2001 13:10 | ....... and exactly what was the difference under the Tories??? | clem | |
28/5/2001 12:30 | yeh..."boom and bust";"sleeze";"forw You can fool enough of the people enough of the time - the rest can't be bothered anyway. IMHO. | peterreidsmith | |
28/5/2001 12:21 | Don't Worry............... Tony and his chums have got the next 5 years to sort this out for us. Things could be worse........... The country may have been run by Portillo & Widdecombe etc for the next 5 years, what a relief it won't be. Regards FBW | flybywyre | |
28/5/2001 10:46 | I guess it's true: ultimately, people get the government they deserve. | peterreidsmith | |
28/5/2001 10:10 | 250 people. How many days of smoking deaths is that? Or might that be hours? | deltawhy | |
28/5/2001 10:09 | seems little point in bringing electioneering issues into the BSE, Dioxin, foot and Mouth issues to me. Voting Tory does not clean the water table not will voting labour or Democrats or SNP. If it can only be cleaned up- and badly- by politicians, give them shovels and gloves and get them all to dig up the unburned caracasses and burn them now. After all there are about 20,000 going round doors and canvassing, give them a real useful task- and Two Jags , Blair and Haig, and that Widdicome could do with a bit of useful exercise Hector. ps ( this handle Says 'Sloaney' - but its really old Hector, in case you see 'Sloaney' again). | sloaney | |
28/5/2001 09:58 | Hmmm.... W.a.t.e.r s.u.p.p.l.y 1 in 200,000. See header. IMHO. | peterreidsmith | |
28/5/2001 09:24 | liitle tyke, no butcher has ever got cjd thing, so you must be in a LOW risk group? I agree evidence that vCJD comes through the accepted route is only what they can call 'most likely guess', therefore I would not worry. I reckon it doesn't come from cattle at all. The french ate far more of our 'high risk' cattle than we evr did, with a far lower incidence of vCJD, which strikes me as pretty conclusive. As for the milk business, it just sounds like more of the nonsense designed to put people off our farm produce, close down the industry. As for giving Tony Blair credit for getting things going on FMD, can we also give him credit that when he said the whole business should be played down, was under control, no need for army to get involved etc, then very little happened, army were not used etc. Good to know someones in charge! | hilda | |
28/5/2001 08:30 | LIttle Tyke - nice to see you have a phd; I only got as far as a 1st myself. I'm not sure what's more worrying; BSE in the water supply, or the fact that it wasn't reported in the news... IMHO. | peterreidsmith | |
26/5/2001 11:20 | MY GOD!!! I really wish I had never opened up this thread. We live in a land where faceless nameless blunderers are ruining our lives and the sad fact is, the ones responsible will never pay foe their mistakes. A labour motto I think. peterreidsmith, you talk much sense. | a.fewbob | |
25/5/2001 23:22 | BSE caused by tory blunders! | little tyke | |
25/5/2001 23:18 | " LONDON (AFX) - The government's top BSE adviser has warned of the dangers of drinking tap water near foot-and-mouth burial sites, the BBC reported. Professor Peter Smith estimates the risk of developing the human form of BSE, known as CJD, through contaminated water could be as high as one in 200,000, in burial pits where older cattle have not first been incinerated, the Express newspaper also reported. ims/shw " Good old Labour, huh -as usual they really thought that one through. Never mind the dioxide risk which is enough for the Dutch not to even consider open-air burning, but they didn't even stop to consider the BSE implications on the water table. VOTE THESE GUYS OUT. IMHO. | peterreidsmith | |
25/5/2001 17:24 | Reports on evening news of problems with diary milk produced near to foot and mouth burial sites being contaminated with dioxins! | superpete | |
25/5/2001 17:07 | Little tyke, what are the initial symptoms apart from shakin, are there any mental manifestations such as radical toryism, tunnel vision,. frothing etc,? if so i think i may have just had some sufferers at my door asking futilely for help. | spongy2 | |
25/5/2001 13:41 | Did anyone see that TV programme a few months back about this farmer-turned-resear | gurlywurly |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions