ADVFN Logo

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for alerts Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers

BSE Base Resources Limited

5.875
0.00 (0.00%)
Last Updated: 08:00:00
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Base Resources Limited LSE:BSE London Ordinary Share AU000000BSE5 ORD NPV (DI)
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 5.875 5.75 6.00 5.875 5.875 5.88 10,968 08:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Iron Ores 271.43M -4.84M -0.0041 -26.83 129.8M
Base Resources Limited is listed in the Iron Ores sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker BSE. The last closing price for Base Resources was 5.88p. Over the last year, Base Resources shares have traded in a share price range of 5.25p to 12.10p.

Base Resources currently has 1,180,000,000 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Base Resources is £129.80 million. Base Resources has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -26.83.

Base Resources Share Discussion Threads

Showing 26 to 45 of 1025 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  5  4  3  2  1
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
28/5/2001
15:38
The Mail, huh...oh well I can't argue with the quality press, eh.

uurrrhhh...

[The FT is the only remaining source of semi-intelligent news reporting, and even then I am more than a little uncomfortable that so many ex-ft jouranlists are on the New-labour pay-roll as "consultants".
You're being brain-washed - successfully and skillfully.]

A little ignorance is a dangerous thing; a lot is just a tragic thing.

IMHO.

peterreidsmith
28/5/2001
15:32
prs, you missed out your Holy grail,,, The Mail..
From todays tory holy grail..,

"AFTER 11.1/2 yrs Under Thatcher
Inflation was 10%....................Now 1.8%
Interest rates 14%....................Now 5%
Unemployment 8.5%...................Now 3.2%
Economic growth at MINUS - 1%...........Now 2.5%"

I would mention mad major but that's pushing credibility to the limit.

Don't mention the FT either they're the same, and I was'nt brainwashed, as i was after all, there at the time.
The papers do print the truth sometimes, personally i'd have been quite happy to retire on a 15% annuity, instead of 6%.

i rely on balls
28/5/2001
14:08
You rely on the Sun.
And TV.
And Balls.

peterreidsmith
28/5/2001
13:31
I agree, the Conservatory party were far more efficient, just look at how they improved the Railways, the NHS, DHSS, etc.
They were all grotty, poorly run, inefficient money pits, and when they left office they were all 10 times worse, until newlab took up the flag, now they're only 9 times worse, still after another 5 years, who knows..

i rely on balls
28/5/2001
13:22
Good example, thanks: remember when it used to be "the Conservative" party...now it's "Tory" - even the press now say Tory.
Amazingly subtle isn't it, but then that's (in this case negative) marketing for you.


Sorry, your question: they did a more competent job.
(And before everyone goes what about "boom and bust" etc...please don't, it would be just too, too sad).

peterreidsmith
28/5/2001
13:10
....... and exactly what was the difference under the Tories???
clem
28/5/2001
12:30
yeh..."boom and bust";"sleeze";"forward, not back";"things can only get better";"only we(Labour) won;t privitise the health service";; don't-think-just-watch-tv-and-read-the-sun;thanks

You can fool enough of the people enough of the time - the rest can't be bothered anyway.

IMHO.

peterreidsmith
28/5/2001
12:21
Don't Worry...................................

Tony and his chums have got the next 5 years to sort this out for us.
Things could be worse...........
The country may have been run by Portillo & Widdecombe etc for the next 5 years, what a relief it won't be.

Regards
FBW

flybywyre
28/5/2001
10:46
I guess it's true: ultimately, people get the government they deserve.
peterreidsmith
28/5/2001
10:10
250 people. How many days of smoking deaths is that? Or might that be hours?
deltawhy
28/5/2001
10:09
seems little point in bringing electioneering issues into the BSE, Dioxin, foot and Mouth issues to me.
Voting Tory does not clean the water table not will voting labour or Democrats or SNP.
If it can only be cleaned up- and badly- by politicians, give them shovels and gloves and get them all to dig up the unburned caracasses and burn them now. After all there are about 20,000 going round doors and canvassing, give them a real useful task- and Two Jags , Blair and Haig, and that Widdicome could do with a bit of useful exercise
Hector.
ps
( this handle Says 'Sloaney' - but its really old Hector, in case you see 'Sloaney' again).

sloaney
28/5/2001
09:58
Hmmm....

W.a.t.e.r s.u.p.p.l.y

1 in 200,000.

See header.

IMHO.

peterreidsmith
28/5/2001
09:24
liitle tyke, no butcher has ever got cjd thing, so you must be in a LOW risk group?
I agree evidence that vCJD comes through the accepted route is only what they can call 'most likely guess', therefore I would not worry. I reckon it doesn't come from cattle at all. The french ate far more of our 'high risk' cattle than we evr did, with a far lower incidence of vCJD, which strikes me as pretty conclusive.
As for the milk business, it just sounds like more of the nonsense designed to put people off our farm produce, close down the industry.
As for giving Tony Blair credit for getting things going on FMD, can we also give him credit that when he said the whole business should be played down, was under control, no need for army to get involved etc, then very little happened, army were not used etc. Good to know someones in charge!

hilda
28/5/2001
08:30
LIttle Tyke - nice to see you have a phd; I only got as far as a 1st myself.

I'm not sure what's more worrying; BSE in the water supply, or the fact that it wasn't reported in the news...

IMHO.

peterreidsmith
26/5/2001
11:20
MY GOD!!!

I really wish I had never opened up this thread.
We live in a land where faceless nameless blunderers are ruining our lives and the sad fact is, the ones responsible will never pay foe their mistakes. A labour motto I think.

peterreidsmith, you talk much sense.

a.fewbob
25/5/2001
23:22
BSE caused by tory blunders!
little tyke
25/5/2001
23:18
"
LONDON (AFX) - The government's top BSE adviser has warned of the dangers of
drinking tap water near foot-and-mouth burial sites, the BBC reported.
Professor Peter Smith estimates the risk of developing the human form of
BSE, known as CJD, through contaminated water could be as high as one in
200,000, in burial pits where older cattle have not first been incinerated, the
Express newspaper also reported.
ims/shw
"

Good old Labour, huh -as usual they really thought that one through. Never mind the dioxide risk which is enough for the Dutch not to even consider open-air burning, but they didn't even stop to consider the BSE implications on the water table.

VOTE THESE GUYS OUT.

IMHO.

peterreidsmith
25/5/2001
17:24
Reports on evening news of problems with diary milk produced near to foot and mouth burial sites being contaminated with dioxins!
superpete
25/5/2001
17:07
Little tyke, what are the initial symptoms apart from shakin, are there any mental manifestations such as radical toryism, tunnel vision,. frothing etc,? if so i think i may have just had some sufferers at my door asking futilely for help.
spongy2
25/5/2001
13:41
Did anyone see that TV programme a few months back about this farmer-turned-researcher who had been confronting the government scientists and their BSE theories? He started out on the organophosphate route but had then found from his studies in BSE-affected areas around the world (and including in Queneborough, Leics, where we have had a cluster of cases) what looked like pretty conclusive evidence of BSE proliferation in areas of high manganese mineralisation in the soil accompanied by (I think it was from memory) low levels of copper. It has taken him years to get anyone to listen and he has had his research sabotaged and his farm damaged along the way (by whom, I wonder?), but he now seems to have found a growing following amongst more open-minded scientists who are taking his research seriously.
gurlywurly
Chat Pages: Latest  5  4  3  2  1

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock