Banco Lat.8%Pfd Share Discussion Threads

[5dally] 30/5/2009 07:52

Ban,,,useless little person

[trojan] 30/5/2009 07:45

Ban ;)

When will the "Free ADVFN kenny" thread start I wonder?

Can't believe I am taking part in this, come on RM it's your thread make the call you know it makes sense!! :)

[inga66] 30/5/2009 06:59

Ban - his posts wind everyone up and i think he has been given
fair warning.

[eeza] 30/5/2009 01:26

Ban.
He has completely trashed, single handed, what was a very informative board with total nonsense. Opposing views are healthy, as you have acknowledged RM. but 6k's output is pure drivel. He appeared on CR's thread, bought into DWY and then immediately accused everyone of P & D, they were all going to sell and he'd be left holding the baby, and claiming he was compiling a dossier of rampers. Soon got up everybody's nose, and he's good at it. Get rid of him and get back to constructive debate.

[ans30bb] 30/5/2009 01:03

Ban - annoying twerp...

[eric bristow] 30/5/2009 00:43

That's 5-0 if Joe's right about Kenny banning himself surely?

EB

[rainmaker] 30/5/2009 00:40

4-0 TO BAN

regards

[joeblogg1000] 30/5/2009 00:39

I reckon 6kenny will be voting to ban himself :))

[rainmaker] 30/5/2009 00:35

Thanks Joe,3-0 to ban

regards

[joeblogg1000] 30/5/2009 00:34

Banjust got fed up with his postings and clogging the thread

[rainmaker] 30/5/2009 00:28

Thanks Pote,2-0 so far to ban 6kenny but plenty of time left and it's taking the complaining posts from the Uniq threads

regards

[ayesha4] 30/5/2009 00:27

He lies that he is a holder.
Then posts drivel trashing the share.........continuously

[pote] 30/5/2009 00:24

Ban him....no don't.
Oh...go on then!!

(edit)
Posters have continually pointed out his inconsistancies but he still carries on regardless.
He's proven to be a distraction and I find it irritating.

Pote

[rainmaker] 30/5/2009 00:23

Thanks Ayesha-Any particular reason, may I ask?

regards

[rainmaker] 30/5/2009 00:10

Poll now open and closes Sunday midnight. I'm going to be strictly impartial and make no recommendation one way or the other but will abide by the majority decision-you do not have to put down a reason.

AGAINST A BAN-Posters should be allowed the right to freedom of speech and Buyers should not be upset when someone posting on a stock exchange BB questions their wisdom by putting an opposing argument. Everyone should be able to post their ideas and thoughts.Investors need some entertainment ie a good laugh when there're losing money. An individual Poster may be the only dissenting poster to offer alternative viewpoint and therefore bring balance to a particular thread.Individual should exercise their judgement in deciding whether to filter a particular Poster.



FOR A BAN-Winds People up Mindless, though sometimes thought provoking posting.Inconsistant and contradictary posts.Critics would say that he cloggs up the thread with numerous inane/pointless comments. Allegations of questionable practices ie stating that he is a holder then posting negatives comments.Also claims that he will use information from another poster and keep repeating it without checking whether the information is factually correct.Democratically investors should be allowed to ban a poster from a particular thread if the majority decide.

[feelinlucky] 25/1/2009 08:24

Will the FSA still not ban naked shorting today?

[checktheevidencedotcom] 20/1/2009 22:10

i bet there wasnt naked shorting when everyone had certificate shares...you buy shares,they lend them out,...hoodless > myrll >peel hunt crooks

[checktheevidencedotcom] 20/1/2009 22:10

i bet there wasnt naked shorting when everyone had certificate shares...you buy shares,they lend them out,...hoodless > myrll >peel hunt crooks