ADVFN Logo

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

AVIA Avia Health

2.125
0.00 (0.00%)
Last Updated: 00:00:00
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Avia Health LSE:AVIA London Ordinary Share GB00B4YSYV64 ORD 0.5P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 2.125 - 0.00 00:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

Avia Health Share Discussion Threads

Showing 951 to 973 of 1000 messages
Chat Pages: 40  39  38  37  36  35  34  33  32  31  30  29  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
10/11/2013
22:19
why would i want to deny being black gold if i were black gold cos for a start i dont earn as much money as he does

am sorry but your the one falling into a trap you have made the fatal mistake of believing obiter dictum as a precedent even though the clue is in the excerpt
quoted from Mr.Justice Eady besides there are far more recent precedents that can be relied on

think anyone reading the malicious postings you make would consider it libel and so hardly surprising if black gold and tim baldwin think the same

graphene investor
10/11/2013
21:16
Good one bili, BG/GI fell right into your nicely prepared trap and once again exposed his knowledge of the law to be rather rudimentary. Two other areas of law where he has recently come to grief are depositions (his "dispositions") and a misguided insistence that GSLM had achieved a renewal of its Tasmanian exploration licence through part performance of a contract (which was merely a routine application that was subsequently refused).

Another shortcoming that was quite revealing was his not knowing of the Latin legal term ultra vires (beyond authorised powers) which I would have thought every law graduate to be thoroughly conversant with. I can't help wondering what limited knowledge BG/GI has of law is what he has picked up working as a clerk in a law firm's office or even by just watching episodes of Rumpole of the Bailey.

The "give and take" aspect of bulletin boards pointed to by Mr Justice Eady makes a lot of sense. Now let's see Tim as urged on by BG who has made the same threats on another board in the past (one more giveaway as to the identity of the GI alias) see what he can do turning plain unadorned facts and truth into slander.

It is a most remarkable coincidence that Tim Baldwin and Black G0ld have identical thoughts on so many issues.

ih_212666
10/11/2013
20:47
Good evening GI,
Further to your comments I unreservedly apologise for my legal shortcoming.
In my defence I did suggest that you confirmed your suggestion that the FCA were bound to publish details of action they take in respect of complaints from members of the public.They clearly gave me incomplete information.
With respect to slander versus libel I took my understanding from the relatively recent comments from a High Court Judge Mr Justice Eady:

"Bulletin board postings more likely slander than libel, says High Court Judge Mr Justice Eady.
Defamation on internet bulletin boards is more like slander than libel, a High Court judge has ruled. Mr Justice Eady said that bulletin board discussions are characterised by "give and take" and should be considered in that context.
In a multi-defendant lawsuit concerning posts on an investors' bulletin board, Mr Justice Eady said that comments on a board are not to be taken in the same context as those in, for example, a newspaper article.
He said that the casual, conversational nature of bulletin boards meant that defamatory comments were more like slander than libel. Slander relates generally to spoken comments and libel generally to written and published ones. In English law it is harder to win damages for slander than libel......."

Having no legal training I will bow to your specialist knowledge,and presume that his judgement is not valid.
As I have apologised publicly to you I hope that you will have the good grace to apologise to me for suggesting that I am an alias of ds?
I am flattered that you think that I have his intellectual abilities....!
I am more than prepared to prove that I am totally unconnected if you feel it is that important.

bili1946
10/11/2013
19:54
KNIGEL,

Drop me a line at drunken.sailor1@hotmail.com and I will give you full background, but in short I have been, and still am, a TXO shareholder since 2005. TXO effectively did the same thing Avia has just done and became an AIM investment company with Tim Baldwin at the helm in Mar 2011. As a PI I expect the companies I part own to provide timely, accurate and unambiguous information as best they can, that does mean saying the bad stuff as well as the good and telling it how it really is and not trying to obscure it with a load of spin and BS. I also expect any public listed company to be run in the best interests of all its shareholders. Under Tim Baldwin, TXO has routinely achieved none of these and I have therefore reduced my TXO shareholding to 1 share and then stood up for all Private Investors (something that many have thanked me for both publicly and privately) in challenging the company and TB in particular to actually do what he is supposed to do. In the process I have complained to his various NOMADs (a company can change NOMAD, but a leopard does not change its spots) AIM regulation and FCA on many occasions. I believe FCA have taken the complaints seriously enough to put pressure on to cause at least one retraction RNS that was dressed up as a clarification and a temporary cessation of other undesirable activities.

You need to be aware that despite the pretense of people like GI/BG/TB that it is just one person with multiple aliases, actually there are a lot of people who feel the same as I do and post accordingly, TB has through his arrogance and deceptions built up a truly international following of people who have had enough of his brand of deception.

I appreciate you want Cientifica to be a success so you can recoup some of your losses. Nothing would please me more than to see that happen. Unfortunately there is no realistic prospect of that happening while TB is involved to which his long history of failures is testament. If Tim Harper does not get rid of him very soon, then that tells you all you need to know about Tim Harper.

Happy to chat more by direct e-mail

drunken sailor
10/11/2013
19:28
GI

If you want to pretend you are not Tim B then e-mail me at drunken.sailor1@hotmail.com and I will send you all the e-mails you want (including my latest to AIM regulation).

In the meantime can you name just 1 TB investment scheme that has made any money for the investors (I can name a few that have made money for TB in fees (World UFO company ring any bells?), but that does not count as making money for investors).

As a lawyer (so you claim) you should know the difference between a statement that could be misconstrued by a careless reader to mean something it plainly did not if read properly and an accusation. As TB you know this very well because you take full advantage of ambiguous wording routinely to mislead investors whilst not technically lying (apart from when you lie about the Tasmania gas pipeline on video in the public domain). Your partner in crime Mad Malc Bendall tries this trick also, but mainly he relies on abysmal grammar to obfuscate.

drunken sailor
10/11/2013
19:15
Were did this feud/argument/disagreement all start? (not with Avia obviously)
Top Info is arranging drinks on the 5th December (see CR thread) in London and all posters are invited. Perhaps a few here should arrange to go and discuss their disagreements face to face?

knigel
10/11/2013
19:13
go on Ds enlighten us as to what was your offer to tim baldwin and what were the threats he made against you

you yourself made a written statement that would cause any objective reader to think that you were making an accusation of perjury against tim baldwin

lets hope he takes up the offer of help

graphene investor
10/11/2013
12:15
bill ie drunken sailor its hilarious as the fca have to publish all and every action they take against any company in order to protect the interests of shareholders.

you are also wrong about the law of defamation as slander refers to a verbal statement and libel a written statement and youre liable in respect of libel defamation against txo, cientifica and tim baldwin at least

unfortunately fictitious characters that can not be identified can claim damages for the same

anyway you were going to explain how tim baldwin is guilty of perjury?

am writing to tim baldwin, txo and cientifica about how i would suggest they proceed and i was right in that youve not given an address for service lol

graphene investor
09/11/2013
20:31
Tim

You tried to get my address so you could send your bully boy Nick M round. You have my e-mail and you had my mobile and home phone numbers - you just completely ignored the e-mail that contained them.

If FCA want my postal address all they need to do is ask. As a government organisation they understand about confidentiality and privacy and what would happen if they breached it.

So you voluntarily decided to produce that "clarification" on the licence what did it say again?

"The Directors of TXO plc the AIM-listed oil and gas investment company, are pleased to clarify the position as regards the appeal which is ongoing in respect of Licence EL14/2009 (the "Licence"), onshore Tasmania.

Under section 25 (2) of the Mineral Resources Development Act 1995 ("the Act"), the correct procedure in The Ministry of Resources Tasmania ("MRT") granting an extension, is to request an application form together with the prescribed fee as prescribed by the Act. It is a requirement that such an application be filed before the current licence expires.

Accordingly, in May 2012, before the current licence expired, Great South Land Minerals Limited (in Liquidation, Receivers and Managers appointed) ("GSLM") applied for a three year extension of the Licence. In making the application, MRT not only requested the application form and the application fee, but in addition the first year's annual rental payable in respect of the extension, plus Goods and Sales Tax ("GST") which is over and above the requirements set out in Section 25 of the Act.

It is GSLM's contention, backed by strong legal precedent, that in accepting the Application Fee and the first year's rental (outside of the provisions of the Act), MRT specifically performed the granting of a three year extension of the Licence in May 2012.

Subsequent to that, on 9th August 2012, the Minister wrote purporting to refuse the extension of term of the Licence. It is GSLM's contention that the Minister did not have the specific authority to do so under section 25(3) of the Act, as the Licence had already been extended through specific performance in MRT accepting payment of the first year's rent, including GST. At no time since has MRT tried or attempted to return the payment of the first year's rent, nor the GST.

Whilst it would have been open to the Minister to attempt to revoke and/or cancel the Licence under section 34 of the Act in May at the time that the application for extension was made, he failed to do so. However, in any event if he were to have done so, he is required to afford the Licensee an opportunity to make submissions under section 34 (2)(b) of the Act which he failed to do.

Accordingly an appeal was lodged by GSLM within the required 28 days. It is therefore GSLM's contention that the Licence continues in accordance with Section 24(7)(b) of the Act until May 2015 or until such time as the Mining Tribunal makes a decision otherwise and we totally refute MRT's position that the Licence has expired.

While the appeal process is ongoing, the Licence remains valid in accordance with the Act. The appeal is currently scheduled to be heard on 3- 5 July 2013."

And what happened? The lawyers never even bothered to turn up and the appeal was lost by default the day before the hearing (in Aug). What is even sicker is Malc never even bothered to tell his loyal GSLM staff and followers (one of whom is 97) so they were all stood outside the court in the Tasmanian winter waiting for a hearing that never happened. But that is how people like you and Malc reward loyalty.

Still waiting for your lawyers to drop me a line - anyone who wants the e-mails where Tim threatens this 22 months ago and I said I would be delighted to chat to them can drop me a line at drunken.sailor1@hotmail.com. After all you did tell the oil barrel conference what a great set of hot shot legal advisers TXO has - Is Julian Hamilton-Barns one of them? I would love to ask him a few questions.

You also claimed to be great at due diligence, so just how much due diligence did you actually do before you started giving TXO shareholders' money to Malcolm Bendall back in May 2011? You forgot to tell Oil Barrel that you are going to have to write off over $2.2m on that fiasco - you won't see a penny from the smart Win case and you know it, or maybe you don't and that is just another failure of due diligence as you continue to waste what little money TXO has left on supporting that case and still paying the receivers to keep what ever mad cap scheme Malc has come up with to regain the licence which is dead and buried.

drunken sailor
09/11/2013
16:56
GI,
I am surprised that you find it so funny?
From memory TXO issued an RNS around 18 months ago setting out how they were going to take action against individuals for "Tortuous Interference"
Again from memory nothing was ever done?
I am not sure about your assertion that the FCA have to announce any action taken when a complaint is received?Perhaps you could confirm that?
If I may add BB defamation will come under "slander" not libel as I am sure you are aware?

bili1946
09/11/2013
13:54
No worries KNIGEL

The new thread for Cientifica is here:



I have put a post on there to set the scene.

drunken sailor
09/11/2013
13:43
Ok. Our posts crossed so sorry and have a good weekend
knigel
09/11/2013
13:39
Graphene Investor = Black G0ld = Tim Baldwin
drunken sailor
09/11/2013
13:25
If u did any research u will see my posts on here go back months.. Long before Tim appeared. (so are u good at research?)
knigel
09/11/2013
13:24
I am not Tim! Look at recent holding rns for Mr Kilminster. Guess what? That's me! So leave your paranora elsewhere and use new thread
knigel
09/11/2013
13:18
KNIGEL,CTFA
frank1e
09/11/2013
12:36
Good afternoon Tim. The question is what does the FCA say to you. What exactly did they say when they forced you to retract that complete nonsense about the licence?

The good thing about the FCA is they are not limited to looking just at breaches of AIM regulations in RNS's. I am sure they will be most interested in the presentation you gave to oil barrel, despite your pathetic attempt to disclaim the lot before you started.

The FCA also has the power to deal with posters who make "false allegations" so why have they not been in touch with me? they and you know exactly who I am and exactly how to contact me. So does your new NOMAD by the way, I will be communicating more with Luke shortly.

What was that bit in the on camera questions about not being able to own more than 50% without doing a proper reverse take over?

Why do you never mention the 50.1% TXO holds in your failed East African Oil Company disaster? You know the one that you used £50k of TXO shareholders' money to bail out so you could pay yourself £11.5k in directors fees.

drunken sailor
09/11/2013
12:35
new ticker please..
knigel
09/11/2013
12:27
Oh not more of those off camera questions where TB lies even more outrageously than he does in the presentation and on camera questions.

Here is the really key part of the OB presentation:

"The content of this confidential document ("Presentation") has not been approved by an authorised person within the meaning of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 ("FSMA"). Reliance on the
information contained in this Presentation for the purposes of engaging in any investment activity may expose the investor to a significant risk of losing all of the property or assets invested."

How he can call it a confidential document when he is in a public presentation that is then automatically posted on the internet just sums up how competent Tim really isn't.

However exactly the same applies to everything TB says including here. The really really key bit for those who have trouble reading small print:

EXPOSE THE INVESTOR TO A SIGNIFICANT RISK OF LOSING ALL OF THE PROPERTY OR ASSETS INVESTED.

Many people have already warned about this, nice of TB to do it himself.

drunken sailor
09/11/2013
12:21
drunken sailor, you do make me laugh, what does the FCA say to you when you make these false allegations or are they just as despairing of you as the rest of us. or will they agree and watch the video evidence of his speech at oil barrell and conclude that the reason why he was so distracted was because he was posting on advfn as both graphene investor and black gold whilst doing his speech lol
graphene investor
09/11/2013
12:10
For once you are right yawnsome in that the txo announcement does not make any reference to graphene or avia, but I never said it did.

am afraid your detective skills are just as lacking as my information was from a phone call with someone who had been at OB and heard TB speak at 10.30am which was before my post and who asked him about cientifica at the end but i had assumed the beginniing. whilst he made reference to graphene the announcement and presentation doesn't really link the two and in the end had nothing to do with cientifica

graphene investor
08/11/2013
18:51
PLEASE NOTE THAT AVIA IS NOW HISTORY!
THERE IS A NEW TICKER (see rns) FOR THIS CASH SHELL COMPANY TO DISCUSS IT GOING FORWARD (hopefully without mentioning TXO too often lol)

knigel
08/11/2013
18:40
DS, you should take a screen shot as well, I suspect the post will be edited out of existence once "GI" (lol) realizes what he's done.

---------------------
Txo have made an interesting announcement this morning that links what they are doing to graphene in the oil and gas sector so it may be a hint as to where this is heading.

Tim Baldwin is speaking at the Oil Barrell conference today so may say something about the direction of this
---------------------

yarsan
Chat Pages: 40  39  38  37  36  35  34  33  32  31  30  29  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock