We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ashtead Group Plc | LSE:AHT | London | Ordinary Share | GB0000536739 | ORD 10P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
26.00 | 0.45% | 5,760.00 | 5,774.00 | 5,778.00 | 5,838.00 | 5,730.00 | 5,766.00 | 1,068,486 | 16:35:17 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heavy Constr Eq Rental,lease | 9.67B | 1.62B | 3.6961 | 15.63 | 25.28B |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
14/12/2018 15:11 | Tested 1700 which held but not a resounding bounce so far. | bracke | |
13/12/2018 13:54 | I note the opening gap from 4/5 December at 1776 has been filled today. Now needs to push on above 1800 but it may drop back to test 1700. | bracke | |
13/12/2018 11:09 | Good day fenners Orange squiggle is the S&P 500. | bracke | |
12/12/2018 20:05 | Apologies if this is old news. Just spotted it was yesterday! | palwing32 | |
12/12/2018 20:03 | Courtesy of the Motley Fool today.The company in question is FTSE 100 support services specialist Ashtead ( | palwing32 | |
12/12/2018 18:40 | What's the orange squiggle ? | fenners66 | |
12/12/2018 17:06 | The chart below compares AHT with the S&P 500. The vertical dashed red line at the left of the chart shows where the buybacks commenced (14 December 2017). AHT/S&P500 DAILY Comparison | bracke | |
12/12/2018 16:36 | https://www.cnbc.com | smcni1968 | |
12/12/2018 16:03 | I note the share price is up 63 points (3.7%) as I type. Might that be as a result of Mr Trump's threat to close down the government unless they give him money for the wall? | bracke | |
12/12/2018 15:48 | "Incentivizing these buybacks is stock-based compensation that rewards senior executives for stock-price performance. ==================== That certainly hasn't worked! | bracke | |
12/12/2018 14:59 | What % of companies that do buy-backs then go on to issue new shares later ? | fenners66 | |
12/12/2018 14:58 | 4. Buybacks That Use Borrowed Money For executives, the temptation to use debt to finance earnings-boosting share purchases can be hard to resist, too. The company might believe that the cash flow it uses to pay off debt will continue to grow, bringing shareholder funds back into line with borrowings in due course. If they're right, they'll look smart. If they're wrong, investors will get hurt. Managers, moreover, have a tendency to assume that their companies' shares are undervalued - regardless of the price. When done with borrowing, share buybacks can hurt credit ratings, since they drain cash reserves that can serve as a cushion if times get tough. One of the reasons given for taking on increased debt to fund a share buyback is that it is more efficient because interest on debt is tax deductible, unlike dividends. However, debt has to be repaid at some time. Remember, what gets a company into financial difficulties is not lack of profits, but lack of cash. | fenners66 | |
12/12/2018 14:56 | "Incentivizing these buybacks is stock-based compensation that rewards senior executives for stock-price performance." | fenners66 | |
12/12/2018 14:55 | "Buybacks can create a short-term bump in the stock price that some say allows insiders to profit, while suckering other investors. This price increase may look good at first, but the positive effect is usually ephemeral, with equilibrium regaining when the market realizes that the company has done nothing to increase its actual value. Those who buy in after the bump can then lose money." | fenners66 | |
12/12/2018 14:46 | In view of recent postings I thought some may find this of interest. | bracke | |
12/12/2018 10:52 | Just a point...How exactly does one decide if the buybacks have been a success? Increase in SP? Increased dividend above and beyond the normal? These two metrics may simply be due to market forces and other factors. On the evidence so far neither apply. | bracke | |
12/12/2018 09:30 | The only Bot at play here is a Maybot. | riley109 | |
12/12/2018 08:27 | Must be bots/shorts at play here?. | discodave4 | |
11/12/2018 22:46 | Some interesting broker comments (see below from Sharecast).Comfortin | discodave4 | |
11/12/2018 22:29 | United Rentals (NYSE:URI) is up 3.1% in postmarket action following updates from its investor day, including resumption of a share repurchase program. The company reaffirmed 2018 full-year guidance, for revenue of $7.89B-$7.99B (vs. consensus for $7.91B), EBITDA of $3.815B-$3.865B, cash from operations of $2.725B-$2.875B and free cash flow of $1.25B-$1.35B. For 2019, it's guiding to revenue of $9.15B-$9.55B (above consensus for $8.93B), EBITDA of $4.35B-$4.55B, cash from operations of $2.85B-$3.2B, and free cash flow of $1.3B-$1.5B. It's resuming a $1.25B repurchase program that it paused on Nov. 1, to focus on integrating its acquisition of BlueLine. About $210M worth of shares were bought on the program through Sept. 30; the company intends to wrap up the full program by the end of 2019. | smcni1968 | |
11/12/2018 19:16 | Guys,Please can we park the issue once again on the buybacks. I respect all of you and your views but can you also just respect the fact that you cannot please everybody all the time and we each have a right to communicate our views - but this is just going over old ground again and tbh it's getting boring - sorry and no offence intended (but it is!).DD | discodave4 | |
11/12/2018 18:54 | Since I have seen the virtues of investing in a well-run successful company for almost a generation I will not be needing any help with that , thanks. As has been said before you can admire a lot about a company and benefit from it - but you do not have to agree with everything it does. A company's shareholders should constantly scrutinise the directors' decisions and actions - that's our job. When that does not happen things can go pear shaped - look at Persimmon for example you know there are many others.... So you would ignore the outcome of £ 425m being spent . We know what the outcome of £425m off the debt would have been ! Roughly what £25m a year saved in interest and no need to renegotiate the next debt tranche before time with the associated "exceptional costs " We know we do not see eye to eye on buybacks - but there have been no facts aired to show me any benefit whatsoever... | fenners66 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions