Buy
Sell
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Arkle Resources Plc LSE:ARK London Ordinary Share IE00B2357X72 ORD EUR0.0025
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.0% 0.80 0.75 0.85 0.80 0.80 0.80 1,413,594 08:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Mining 0.0 -0.3 -0.2 - 2

Arkle Resources Share Discussion Threads

Showing 1751 to 1773 of 2100 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  72  71  70  69  68  67  66  65  64  63  62  61  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
08/5/2008
13:07
Anybody there or interested? Lets hope this starts a bit of a roll for these.
chavitravi
29/4/2008
17:08
There is your answer DAVRON8. Fil Ltd dumped well over 10 million shares. They have gone from holding 11.8m to 920K. Made a nice little come back but there has been some selling today.
chavitravi
17/4/2008
19:43
Just had a look at the trades & vols. Millions bought & sold, so there was something going on with the mm's. 1,600,000 one to deal with there just for one. Davron8 may be right. see 351. Certainly the early trades no were nears the justification of that 2p drop. Pure manipulation at P.I expense. bloody criminal.
chavitravi
17/4/2008
16:19
Recon its just market jitters. Arm has drop quite a bit first off so it could well be a fall on the back of it, if you recall Arc went up on the back of it in the first place. Who knows? the mm's are shifty s---- & I for one think what they get away with needs a reckoning.
chavitravi
17/4/2008
12:00
It may be that the good results from Intel have produced a big order buy and the MM's are trying to shake out some more shares to meet it. Just a thought as there does not seem to be any other reason for a drop of 2pence today.
davron8
17/4/2008
09:56
Anybody know the reason for the fall today?
phda
04/4/2008
14:01
This should not be this price, if folk don't buy now they will never get in again this low. With the news coming out a bit better now I'm very surprised its still falling and no apparent interest.
chavitravi
13/3/2008
10:28
I do see what you are saying but as was pointed out by Anjalo:344 the worth isn't in this case what I feel you should be looking at right now, its what it will be worth!! You used the operative word "Acquisition", over time steady but steady they have bought the right thing and as importantly in many purchases the brains and expertise as well. You have a very "well rounded company" now perfectly placed to do probably as they set out to do "Scoop the coop" in all area. Think about what they have bought as well as the brains & how it all knits?
chavitravi
12/3/2008
17:35
Im no expert but ARCs' technology does look very hi-tech. Gross margins are very high and Ive a feeling ARC could be a highly profitable business sometime in the future. But when? It looked like they were heading towards break-even. But the recent acquisitions have put the kybosh on that! If you take out the interest on cash and the tax credit the business lost £5.3M last year on revenues of £14.4M. They are actually a long way from profitability. I just cant get my head round how little theyve achieved with all the expenditure thats been made over the last 8 years.
hugepants
12/3/2008
10:00
Anjalo: Agreed, you have it about right. If we believe the management competent would they invest that much that Hugepants is talking about without a pay off? I think not. This Company has come together well and I think it will see the rewards next year, 2010 latest. I have not looked (been Ill) but the price will have come down on relatively small sales, sales of the impatient. Like some of you folk I am down on this one but I'm sticking.
chavitravi
12/3/2008
00:06
HugePants, Using the share price in this way, as some kind of intelligent indicator of worth is IMHO not reality for a company like ARC. Since you have obviously done some historical research, try comparing ARC 2003 with ARC 2008 in terms of market cap, cash burn, licenses and products. There is no comparison. The ARC of today is a very well run company with excellent products and low cash burn, yet it had a higher market CAP in 2003, prior to its nose dive to about 13.5p as I remember. I may have the dates slightly wrong but you get my drift. The share price of these low market cap companies is an almost totally irrational thing. It seems to follow some kind of chaos theory, but quality will find a way and in my view this is a quality company. Be patient and the share price may well err in the other direction. All IMHO of course. a
anjalo
11/3/2008
19:18
Yes but it looks like its about to change and the business looks well set for the future.
amt
11/3/2008
13:52
Since floatation in 1999 ARC have posted total losses of £121 million. Total R&D expense is £76 million. And whats the net result of all that expenditure? £14.4 million in revenues and a 2.5 million loss! Stripping out the cash the "business" is now being valued at £16 million. What an abjectly dismal performance.
hugepants
03/3/2008
16:31
If this Compactflash doesn't put them well in I don't know what will. This has got to start moving up the way its going. Its a hold for me, I'm in no hurry. I'm confident it will pay in the near future.
chavitravi
20/2/2008
12:21
A lose Yes, But this looks very good for the future, they are putting the company together very nicely in my view.
chavitravi
20/2/2008
07:33
2007 year,loss money again, but cash/share = 13p, ?? so up? do not know, down? 15p is support line.
hmkwan
14/2/2008
17:29
This signing they have just done, is it the one that was in the pipeline that was reported earier in their last report back?
chavitravi
14/2/2008
17:24
Just had a look on Yahoo for the finish price on another of mine & they have ARC 1 year target as 48p with a high of 55p. Looks as if it will be 2010 before they show a profit though on 3 analists opinions. 3 brokers out of 3 recommend BUY though.
chavitravi
13/2/2008
09:40
This news should be sending this up more than this, lets hope when the market settles better it will.
chavitravi
06/2/2008
11:36
Anybody there? Ark post that they have signed a deal & the price goes DOWN. Can you believe it?
chavitravi
05/2/2008
12:43
It looks as if this is taking a hammering on the ARM results, they are understandably not happy bunnies with the results. That does not mean the results for ARK will be the same although the semiconductor market is down. Has Puffin Tickler said (330)the last statement did seem to have some window dressing but we will see soon. Me, I'm holding, not worth selling out now.
chavitravi
01/2/2008
16:17
Strange how they put out the info, there has only been one trade for 20,000 shares & that was "buy". These have it has a sell.
chavitravi
10/1/2008
16:14
Yes I see what you mean PT in respect of like for like & putting it as they have "constant dollar basis" could be seen as a bit of craft. I think we will have to wait till 20th Feb to see things a little more clearly. I would agree the prospects do look good. I bought these in the first place because I realise the importance of power save especially in the medical world and I still have no doubt ARC should do well.
chavitravi
Chat Pages: Latest  72  71  70  69  68  67  66  65  64  63  62  61  Older
ADVFN Advertorial
Your Recent History
LSE
ARK
Arkle Reso..
Register now to watch these stocks streaming on the ADVFN Monitor.

Monitor lets you view up to 110 of your favourite stocks at once and is completely free to use.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P: V: D:20200712 00:57:21