ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

ARB Argo Blockchain Plc

11.00
-0.50 (-4.35%)
16 Apr 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Argo Blockchain Plc LSE:ARB London Ordinary Share GB00BZ15CS02 ORD 0.1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -0.50 -4.35% 11.00 10.50 11.50 11.25 10.75 11.25 2,810,539 11:14:44
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Business Services, Nec 47.36M -194.23M -0.3628 -0.30 58.89M
Argo Blockchain Plc is listed in the Business Services sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker ARB. The last closing price for Argo Blockchain was 11.50p. Over the last year, Argo Blockchain shares have traded in a share price range of 6.25p to 35.50p.

Argo Blockchain currently has 535,325,166 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Argo Blockchain is £58.89 million. Argo Blockchain has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -0.30.

Argo Blockchain Share Discussion Threads

Showing 2676 to 2698 of 67775 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  119  118  117  116  115  114  113  112  111  110  109  108  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
03/1/2020
12:48
As the hash rate increases this will be offset by the difficulty rate so that the average block time remains at circa 10 minutes.
orm5
03/1/2020
12:26
No higher hashrates means the share of the spoils is reduced so ROI reduces and high cost miners stop. With halving coming that will amplify the effect significantly
scotty666
03/1/2020
12:25
and UP she goes

10p in a month

topazfrenzy
03/1/2020
12:20
Of course the rise in hashrate is there to service the expected rise in transaction rate, is it not?So if the hashrate doubles and the number of network BTC transactions also doubles the miners should retain the same percentage of rewards.Is this a logical argument?
hootza616
03/1/2020
11:07
Sorry about the duplicates, PC had a hissy fit.
crooky1967
03/1/2020
11:06
I would imagine they would need upgrading every 3 years or so, however if they are still making a profit after 3 years then keep them running.

Just had a look at the specs of some old Bitmain T9's going back to August 2017. Based on our current electricity costs they would still be making $475 per year profit, Therefore if we had 17,000 of these installed 2 and half years ago they would be still be making $8m a year.

I would hope that a certain % of cash that will be made going forward will be ploughed into new machines and some given back to share holders.

The latest machines are being paid back within 5-6 months therefore meaning that they would be generating free cash flow for 24-30 months to be used for new machines and divi's.

crooky1967
03/1/2020
11:06
I would imagine they would need upgrading every 3 years or so, however if they are still making a profit after 3 years then keep them running.

Just had a look at the specs of some old Bitmain T9's going back to August 2017. Based on our current electricity costs they would still be making $475 per year profit, Therefore if we had 17,000 of these installed 2 and half years ago they would be still be making $8m a year.

I would hope that a certain % of cash that will be made going forward will be ploughed into new machines and some given back to share holders.

The latest machines are being paid back within 5-6 months therefore menaing that they would be generating free cash flow for 24-30 months to be used for new machines and divi's.

crooky1967
03/1/2020
11:06
I would imagine they would need upgrading every 3 years or so, however if they are still making a profit after 3 years then keep them running.

Just had a look at the specs of some old Bitmain T9's going back to August 2017. Based on our current electricity costs they would still be making $475 per year profit, Therefore if we had 17,000 of these installed 2 and half years ago they would be still be making $8m a year.

I would hope that a certain % of cash that will be made going forward will be ploughed into new machines and some given back to share holders.

The latest machines are being paid back within 5-6 months therefore menaing that they would be generating free cash flow for 24-30 months to be used for new machines and divi's.

crooky1967
03/1/2020
10:37
i would imagine in a few years ARBs new installs will be uneconomical and require upgrading. Valuation will depend a lot on how often these machines require upgrading,CapX cost going forward is always going to remain high.
john henry
03/1/2020
10:34
BTC has risen a little but ARB has not.
Noting the relationship of the combination of hashrate, BTC price and installed units - ARB may indeed attempt to keep it's share but at what capital cost?
I think ARB may have entered the circle of having to add machines to keep the mining rate up - these machines bought with it's coin yield - only to have to buy more machines?
At what point is the SH going to see the reward?
Mr Market is far from convinced and even with today's BTC rise - there appears to be more sells than buys...

roddyb
03/1/2020
10:28
Bitcoin and Monero soaring, the King and Prince of Crypto
topazfrenzy
03/1/2020
10:14
I see the hashrate rise as advanced speculation of the BTC price doubling in May. As we know it takes a fair amount of time to implement these machines and planning a year ahead from May 2019 to be in a good position this year is what has happened, not just here at ARB but other mining facilities.The network is ready for the boom!
hootza616
03/1/2020
08:59
I recall reading that the depreciation was based on 3 or 4 years, but could have changed as I think that was in the original prospectus
orm5
03/1/2020
08:51
With war in Iran about to take off, buy GOLD and BITCOIN now
topazfrenzy
03/1/2020
08:50
Yes, ARB is ahead of the pack just now and may retain that position for many months, even years.

It depends on the speed of delivering the next generation of mining machines and their price.

If the next generation is considerably faster and cheaper, ARB will have to replace their current machines with new ones.

What is ARB's policy on hardware depreciation? I imagine it is to write off the total cost every two years.

horneblower
03/1/2020
07:57
In the sort term ARBs share price will fluctuate by a combination of hashrate, BTC price and installed units. The important thing for ARB is to maintain their processing fraction of any hashrate rise. Which they are more than doing at the moment.
By doing this, their profits will align with BTC price which will eventually rise. Currently they are doing the right thing by increasing their share of this fraction. But it also means it will become more difficult to maintain. A doubling of the hashrate means they will need to double their processing power to maintain their market share of mined BTC.
Eventually BTC will rise from the ashes for another bull run and ARB will not only take advantage from this but also a rise in PE ratio as investors try and get in on the profits.
It’s just a waiting game for now.

scottman72
03/1/2020
07:32
Scottman72 I agree with the principle but in ARB's situation the share-price is so far out of line that reduced margins will still mean a huge profit. And don't forget the potential rise in price and the reduction of those who can mine profitably. The DOW put on a stellar performance last night but still BTC regained the $7200 level. BTC and ARB is the best story around IMHO also in GOLD look at BMV.
parsons4
03/1/2020
06:40
Simples. It means mining profitability goes down, which means share price goes down.
Even though it also means more inefficient mines turning off, this is small in comparison to the lost share price

scottman72
03/1/2020
00:30
Why is it a bad thing Riddler?
hootza616
02/1/2020
21:45
Doesn't help hash rate hitting all time high
riddlerone
02/1/2020
19:59
Back down tomo :(
blackrolie00
02/1/2020
14:40
About time it moved been a dog
nw99
02/1/2020
12:19
Quarterly financial updates are perfectly adequate and actually far more reliable as they represent a mean average. Weekly or monthly updates are very misleading and unreliable in ascertaining the long term direction. Last Q3 update was mid Oct i believe so look forward to Q4 in mid Jan.Holding and adding.
ragnarr
Chat Pages: Latest  119  118  117  116  115  114  113  112  111  110  109  108  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock