We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apace Media | LSE:APA | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B0PCZJ47 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.875 | - | 0.00 | 00:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
08/3/2010 10:22 | Holding these shares do we sell by the 16th or hold and let your children inherit the shares. These are woth a lot more than 0.6p. | howie1943 | |
07/3/2010 12:27 | This is a mugs game. With shares like APA PI'S are on a hiding to nothing. Once this is delisted will we ever hear anything again. | mam fach | |
04/3/2010 17:16 | Another 1m sell today. General Meeting tomorow to approve proposal to cancel listing. With Stoessel 68% plus other directors approval its a fore gone conclusion. What next for us small shareholders who agree with CEO Soessel that the shares are worth more than 4p and are very unhappy to accept 06p. This is the reason given for de-listing from aim, the market didn't recognise the true worth of Apace. | howie1943 | |
24/2/2010 11:51 | no one interested in this one anymore? | flungu1 | |
23/2/2010 20:52 | Please read their statement on the proposed delisting from aim, which course will they take. | howie1943 | |
23/2/2010 13:04 | Please answer the question asked. | mam fach | |
23/2/2010 10:25 | The question to be asked.....what are they going to do with the shareholders who dont sell their shares on AIM? | howie1943 | |
22/2/2010 20:03 | Would you if you had some spare cash? Be honest! I agree, it would be risky but who knows.. | flungu1 | |
22/2/2010 17:41 | No! I'm not buying, no cash. | howie1943 | |
22/2/2010 12:32 | I presume you ar still buying then. He who dares wins! | mam fach | |
21/2/2010 23:42 | Who indeed would be so stupid. Some people (myself included) find it very difficult to admit to buying a dud. Always hoping for a recovery and the posibility we will get our money back. | mam fach | |
21/2/2010 17:19 | Why would anyone want to buy these now? | flungu1 | |
21/2/2010 12:05 | It's a dead cat bounce. There are three alternatives: Bite the bullet and Sell. Average down and Buy more. Hold on. Only those running the company know what is going on so without this information it's impossible to makethe correct decision. | mam fach | |
19/2/2010 13:58 | Why share price up 6% with all the sells? | howie1943 | |
18/2/2010 20:03 | If we keep the shares and it is taken over what happens then? This not just a dead duck, they have cash 2 million pounds of it. I agree this is rather outrageous way to treat shareholders but i'm not selling at this crazy price. | leadersoffice | |
18/2/2010 17:13 | Didier Stoessel bought 18.7m shares at 2p in the Feb/2009 placing and now has a total holding of 96.8m and with other directors hold 104.2m shares out of a total 145.8m shares, therefore, they own the company. These same directors can now buy their own company at 0.08p rather than the pre announcment price of 2p. A much cheaper way for Stoessel to buy the company rather than a takeover. I also note that a number of insitutional investors have pulled out over past year. With bankers playing heads I win and tails you lose and being an ex banker Stoessel(HSBC) has the gift of showing us small shareholders of how little we count when it comes to making money. | howie1943 | |
16/2/2010 16:24 | Well I'm not selling mine, will be interested to see what happens in the short term. | leadersoffice | |
16/2/2010 15:59 | Shareholders selling-out and someone is clearing up all the sales. Is it the CEO and the directors who know what the company is worth, which is a lot more than the current stock market price.Small shareholders yet again being ignored. Was moving out of London an indication of delisting. | howie1943 | |
16/2/2010 15:07 | It can hardly be fair to expect shareholders to sell out at a market cap. which is now below one million. Surely must be wrong to sell out at current levels. Better to hold on. | truffle | |
16/2/2010 12:32 | If I were a shareholder then I might have an issue with the following statement:- "The Directors are considering the Group's options in respect of its factual television production and distribution businesses and are considering all alternatives, including the possible disposal of these businesses to a third party. The Directors' current considerations may or may not lead to a transaction. Shareholders will be kept informed of any material developments." and the January statement :- "The Directors of Apace note the movement in the Company's share price and know of no reason for the recent rise." SP had shot back up to 3p at that stage on disposal gossip. A cynic (not myself I hasten to add) might think that they didn't want a rising share price to interfere with a possible delisting. Anyway I leave shareholders to make up their own minds! Michael. | michaelmouse | |
15/2/2010 18:33 | Truffle - Some shareholders won't like holding shares in a company that isn't listed and whose shares will be even more difficult to trade than they are now:- "The principal effects of the Cancellation will include (amongst others): (a) there will be no public stock market on which Shareholders can trade their Ordinary Shares and, further, no other trading facility (other than the Third Party Facility referred to in paragraph 6 below) will be available to enable trading of the Ordinary Shares. Consequently, following Cancellation, there can be no guarantee that a Shareholder will be able to purchase or sell any Ordinary Shares; (b) no price will be publicly quoted for the Ordinary Shares;" I'm not a holder of APA shares, but do hold shares in DCD media. The statement suggests talks are still ongoing with DCD (or others) to dispose of Steadfast and APA's music publishing business. APA shareholders do have my sympathy since it appears they will be delisting well below fair value. Sadly, it is always a risk with smaller companies where the CEO has a major holding (68% from a previous post?). Good luck. Michael. | michaelmouse | |
15/2/2010 18:16 | Cash of £2.1 million, if that figure is correct, against a market cap. of £1.8 million (maybe rather lower after to-day's fall in the share price) plus an ongoing business worth how much? On the face of it, why would shareholders sell at 1p/share? | truffle |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions