[ADVERT]
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Angus Energy Plc LSE:ANGS London Ordinary Share GB00BYWKC989 ORD GBP0.002
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.0% 1.00 0.95 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 511,711 07:46:38
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Oil & Gas Producers 0.1 -2.5 -0.4 - 10

Angus Energy Share Discussion Threads

Showing 10876 to 10897 of 10900 messages
Chat Pages: 436  435  434  433  432  431  430  429  428  427  426  425  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
22/10/2021
15:48
JT They may have no choice but to DE-comm the weald assets. Balcombe as we have pointed out doesn't appear to have been appealed to the secretary of state. Brockham license expires in 5 days' time. If they get it extended again by another 6 months this would be the 4th time! Lidsey appears to have turned out far from as expected reading that RNS, The 2 other wells they refer to are outside the tiny license 5KM area to the south. The existing Angus wells Wells are already on the southern border of the license.
ja51oiler
22/10/2021
14:17
You don't need to point it out. Anyone who reads these board for more than 5m will quickly realise JT and his other accounts are trolling 24/7
3put
22/10/2021
13:47
have a nice weekend all .... pahahahahahahaahahahha
sincero1
22/10/2021
13:47
and here are jtisadly recent comments about Mercuria : "it's going to cost Mercuria lots of money" "Maybe they can use Anguish's tax losses" "I expect Mercuria to want Anguish to have more placings" "I dare say Mercuria will be getting all its original demands met" "I expect the loan terms to stipulate release of funds as and when needed and subject to Mercuria's specific approval" "Id be surprised if we don't see the appointment of a Mercuria person as a Director there very shortly." "The proposed loan terms are unaffordable. Mercuria must have something else in mind" "For someone like Mercuria, this is a no-brainer. Tax losses that make pulling the plug on Anguish pretty well risk-free if they can't make money on the gas" "If Mercuria finds itself strapped for cash, it's going to be a problem." "...and Mercuria are in trouble, things could get awkward quite quickly, what?" "Sharks" "Hyenas" Brown trousers on standby .... only plus is they go well with this old geriatrics living room colour scheme and slippers ...
sincero1
22/10/2021
13:45
jtisadly " in my view" Well as we all are now aware your view is not worth anything at all being so disingenuous mendacious and duplicitous . discredited and ridiculed constantly . just for fun lets see those recent posts from this clown again: 5.7.21 "placing this week or next" 8.7.21"another placing or two in the next few months" 9.7.21 "" placing is in the queue and will come once the latest UKOG issue has been digested" 14.7.21 ""I'm expecting two placings this year" 21.5.21 "poor angus 0.20 soon" 23+ weeks ago. " share price into the sixties shortly " 23+ weeks ago. "oga approval doubt" . " financing doubt" . " running out of money " weekly prediction for last 9 months. " 0.15 by end of year". " placing soon " daily prediction for last 10 months. "its a pump & dump" - it wasn't. "gas to Shell at current prices from New Year until July in decent volumes. I' put the chances of that at about 1%" "you should be pleased - that 0.70p re-entry level of yours is just round the corner. and my favourite " They did run out of money towards the end of March, as we predicted" - And from the interim : As at 31 March 2021 the Group had cash of £591,000. As at 31 March 2021 the Group had net current assets of £1,351,000"
sincero1
22/10/2021
13:44
1347: I take your point about the wine though. You may be onto something there.
jtidsbadly
22/10/2021
13:38
1347: they've deliberately put the Weald “assets” back in the frame precisely to avoid any question of provisions, in my view. So I doubt they'll raise money for that at this stage. They intend neither to progress nor to provision for them. Crocqman’s otherwise good post is flawed by his statement that the schedule for the project is 14 months late. The original forecast was for May-August 2020, wasn’t it? It looks like April 2022 at the moment, though with Anguish, these things have a marked tendency to slip and slip, what?
jtidsbadly
22/10/2021
13:15
HITS No wrong yet again, I have no interest in dancing on lines. Your logic is as flawed as saying getting a £12m loan at onerous terms due to getting the costs wrong by a country mile (other explanations are available) is a good thing. Or claiming that bigger losses are a good thing because then you have a bigger tax asset. It seems to me that you may have been on the ocebot training course. Come to think of it, has anyone actually ever seen them in the same room together? PS: I expect a placing or other fund rise anyway, how else will they progress/abandon (delete as appropriate) their Weald 'assets' and cover the Christams wine bill?
1347
22/10/2021
13:13
hits - don't lower yourself....justifying yourself to those two is like pis*ing into the wind....you are only going to cover yourself in pi*s.....
sincero1
22/10/2021
12:55
Now now, gentlemen. I know that 1347 is in a positive hissyfit of pique, owing to my failure to recognise some archaic country and western no-mark like Tennessee Ernie Vauxhall and ascribe to him (whoever he was) the same level of musical credibility as Pink Floyd, but still. (You know, I never had 1347 down as a devotee of line dancing, but hey, each to his/her/its own...) If you look at what the alternatives would have been for ANGS if they hadn't got the requirement to stump up £1.4 million in just six months' time postponed (and let's face it, nobody realistically expects them to have produced oodles of gas out of Poundland by the original Apr 20th 2022 repayment due date), then postponing repayment was their only viable option - even if those extra 12 months of bullet dodging has cost them an an eye-poppingly Shylock-esque rate. So sure, on balance a good thing for the company. But far more an essential thing to continuing existence than a good one, and even then only "good" in the sense that herpes is "good" when compared to ebola. Again, what other alternatives were there, given the company's long-ongoing pre-revenue state? The only other option I could come up with would have involved a rush-job placing, probably resulting in a c. 15% dilution... and that would have been a great deal worse.
headinthesand
22/10/2021
12:54
JT I'm sure it's mapped out for something that doesn't involve stale Bulls, Paddy has previous on this. Can't see what it's posting but it seems HITS' new found friend is back.
1347
22/10/2021
12:45
hits - i no longer look at ukog , i have email alerts set for ukog so if anything extraordinary happens i will know about it bad or good . they are a paper loss until i crystallize them. It is still fresh in my mind that ukog went from .08 to 8p based on nothing except sentiment and hope ......so optimism is my only thoughts currently there... i see the resident disingenuous grey old window lickers are back with, surprise surprise , negative supposition as i predicted earlier .... and seems they have turned on you as they failed to coerce and manipulate you ...as they have uclot, ja51contactvoidoiler and clickbait...... ..they always show their true colours in the end ........
sincero1
22/10/2021
12:38
1347: well, yes, I agree that’s a possibility, unless the Lenders fancy their chances of achieving a return on it by managing the thing themselves. Anguish are going to cost them £2.5mm p.a. on top of the finance cost when Anguish can’t make the interest/capital payments. It’s one thing for AIM shareholders to keep these chaps in the manner to which they’ve become accustomed but these Lenders are hard-nosed types, what? I agree that in the eventuality you outline, the current shareholders are unlikely to do very well. The Interim MD may need to parachute himself elsewhere to achieve his geothermal ambitions.
jtidsbadly
22/10/2021
12:30
JT - Yes funds heading in all directions except the shareholders, other than Knowe. I wouldn't be at all surprised if there was a deferment of the main loan to come yet, which will also come at a price.
1347
22/10/2021
12:17
1347: yes, I know what you mean. I think he’s striving manfully to be even-handed. The extra money they’re paying Knowe puts Knowe approximately on par with the Lenders in terms of the interest rate they’re respectively getting on the first year of the Lenders’ £12mm and the final year (as it now turns out) of the Knowe loan. Fair do’s, what? If Knowe asked for this, it seems equitable that they got it.
jtidsbadly
22/10/2021
11:58
JT Yes I know, I'm resigned to more of the same next week. Bit worried about HITS though, his/her/its previously accurate assessments seem to have become as flawed as their musical knowledge and they now think admitting that you can't repay an agreed loan on time and having to pay the equivalent of £110,000 to push it back a few months is a positive. No wonder he gets stuck in lobster pots, maybe it's spending too much time in Kansas that causes it?
1347
22/10/2021
11:42
1347: unless Cudswallop and Jamesll get behind it with big orders, 4p now looks optimistic for this afternoon.
jtidsbadly
22/10/2021
11:32
Sincero, I agree that in comparison, ANGS is a better bet. (They may be able to get sufficient gas out of Poundland to meet - and of course hopefully exceed - their already incurred commitments, both debt funding and hedge related). Still very high risk though, because it all hangs on my much quoted question "how much gas and by when?" The answers appearing to those questions is in my view literally life or death for ANGS. However, unbelievable though it may be, UKOG is in an even more perilous state. Its recent Turkey trot seems to have slammed into an unsurprising brick wall (and I suspect that whole episode to have been entered into as a smokescreen). I cannot for the life of me foresee where UKOG is ever going to generate any noticeable revenues. It's certainly not going to be out of Loxley, no matter what permissions may or may not be granted...
headinthesand
22/10/2021
10:22
hits - yes I do hold ukog...I have written that investment off although I haven't sold them...as with aim you never know ....
sincero1
22/10/2021
09:52
Sincero, solely out of idle curiosity, am I right in thinking you also hold some quantity of UKOG shares? I think I remember you saying you did, but am not sure.
headinthesand
22/10/2021
09:33
ahhhh... nice and negative supposition free here today ..... unfortunately it won't last...so predictable ...
sincero1
22/10/2021
07:30
yawn..same spectrum different ends...truth is the best defence...
sincero1
Chat Pages: 436  435  434  433  432  431  430  429  428  427  426  425  Older
ADVFN Advertorial
Your Recent History
LSE
ANGS
Angus Ener..
Register now to watch these stocks streaming on the ADVFN Monitor.

Monitor lets you view up to 110 of your favourite stocks at once and is completely free to use.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P: V: D:20211022 15:46:56