[ADVERT]
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Angus Energy Plc LSE:ANGS London Ordinary Share GB00BYWKC989 ORD GBP0.002
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.048 5.99% 0.85 0.80 0.90 0.85 0.725 0.83 10,918,652 15:53:24
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Oil & Gas Producers 0.1 -2.5 -0.4 - 8

Angus Energy Share Discussion Threads

Showing 12476 to 12500 of 14775 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  507  506  505  504  503  502  501  500  499  498  497  496  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
19/10/2021
15:45
Noted your frequent use of the term: "Window Lickers" "Window Lickers" appears to be an offensive term referring to disabled children on school buses - according to the internet. Not very PC (IN)Sincerio !?!?! Are you showing your age / lack of intellectual ability or both? CQ :-(
clottedq
19/10/2021
15:28
hits " 3Put is also UJ9 is also WhoCares is also EchDelta is also CantRememberThis is also Cuddo." No sh*t Sherlock..... :) i agree with consistency of presence ... our resident disingenuous window lickers are always present and very consistent.....
sincero1
19/10/2021
15:05
Again Sincero, the big difference is consistency of presence. The "new arrivals" over here are a lot more obvious of course. 3Put is also UJ9 is also WhoCares is also EchDelta is also CantRememberThis is also Cuddo.
headinthesand
19/10/2021
14:55
Your name vill still also go on der list HITS. Talking of lists @JA - Can you add the FoS moron 3Put to the list that you are compiling?
1347
19/10/2021
14:32
hits " I'm also sure that, if you, I and anyone else were to make separate lists of blatantly obvious members of the disingenuous ramptastic squad, those lists would match nigh on exactly." Ditto the disingenuous derampers list . are we the only 2 who stick to the truth ?
sincero1
19/10/2021
14:26
There is no hedge on production until July 2022. What is the value of all production from March 2022 to July 2022 at the prices on the present NBP Heren forward curve for these months with and without the side track? Asked on 21 September 2021 The short answer is the field ,on the original CPR plateau volumes but at the latest forward curve prices, might generate £17 mllion over those four months with the side track and about £8.5m without it. Angus share is 51%. Ordinary opex might be about £0.6m excluding debt service. The forward prices from https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/energy/natural-gas/uk-nbp-natural-gas-usd-mmbtu-icis-heren-front-month.quotes.html are given below in $/MMBTU (approx pence/therm equivalent in brackets). Prices from ICE for contracts for Q2 in pence/therm in particular seem to be a penny or two better which is probably the £/$ exchange rate (see https://www.theice.com/products/910/UK-Natural-Gas-Futures/data?marketId=5188706) Heren March $28.583 (213p); April $16.679 (119p); May $14.260 (102p); June $13.774 (98p), given a conservative conversion rate of volume (mmscf) to heat value (therms) – i.e. multiply mmscf by 10500 to get therms – the field would generate in total over those four months gross revenues for all partners of £17.1 million at 10mmscf/d (i.e. CPR plateau production with side track) or £8.6 million at 5 mmscf/d (i.e. CPR lower plateau production with no sidetrack). Operating expenses for full year 2022 according to CPR might be of the order of £2.3m and therefore for this period would be c. £0.6m. All of this information is already publicly available, and we stress these are presently notional numbers arrived at approxmately and that these prices are not hedged in any way and therefore might not be available come production in March etc. However whilst the final outcome may vary considerably, we and our partners do anticipate strong demand for gas in the coming years regardless of short term price effects.
3put
19/10/2021
14:26
Some board posters are saying that a side track done in November would delay First Gas by up to 3 months. This sounds like nonsense. Can you comment? Asked on 21 September 2021 No it would emphatically not delay First Gas by three months. In fact there is no reason for it to delay First Gas by any material length of time and it is certainly not in the plan that it does. We are planning to execute the limited foundation work required beforehand and move heavy equipment in both before and after the drilling programme and will be following this week’s HAZOP with further SIMOP (Simultaneous Operations) planning which will allow for sensibly risked continuous working on the site during the programme. Again this poster may have misunderstood the nature of the equipment coming onto site, almost all of which is skid-mounted and pre-fabricated for immediate tie-in to the pipework and control lines. Thus some of the equipment won’t come on until February but none of the units will require on-site fabrication beyond connection work.
3put
19/10/2021
14:25
There has been much recent comment on the investment forums about how long the sidetrack would take to drill at Saltfleetby. Certain posters have claimed that they have internal company documents that say this will take 16 weeks. Please can you let me know if this is correct or if you expect it to take a different amount of time? Also being speculated about is the volume of gas that has been hedged. It has been claimed that you have hedged 70% of 10mmscf/d and therefore the sidetrack has to be completed and everything has to run well for the project to be viable. Please could you confirm if this is correct or if the hedge is for different figures? Asked on 23 September 2021 We would be surprised and disappointed if the drilling part of the programme exceeded 28 days and the entire programme involved more than 7-10 days either side. On behalf of the Board, we have never heard or seen of any internal document which suggested we were planning for a 16 week side-track at Saltfleetby and we would challenge the poster to produce it. For that matter I haven’t heard of a drilling programme anywhere to these depths which could conceivably take 16 weeks – except perhaps on Mars, which is possibly where your poster hails from. Supplementally, one poster has pointed out that the Planning Application allowed for 16 weeks time. This is not some “internal document” which the poster only had access to, but part of an application that is publicly available. Every company puts in their application for more time than is absolutely necessary in every sphere of life. This is hardly news. We reiterate drilling to these depths does not take 16 weeks as every reasoning investor in this industry knows. The other assertion is equally bizarre and must be challenged. We have already clearly stated that the hedge was for “approximately 70% of the Company’s future gas sales …. under a conservative projection” and this was prudently set by the lenders, based, as we understand it, on their own estmates of achievable flow from the existing wells and excluding the contribution from the side track. Otherwise it would obviously not be a conservative projection.
3put
19/10/2021
14:25
I have just checked your planning statement on slide 13, It states the sidetrack duration will take up to 16 weeks as mentioned from another poster. Please could you clear this query up once and for all. Asked on 1 October 2021 As now already noted, all applicants for permits and permissions in any walk of life give themselves much more time to complete a task than is necessary. This is because of the length of time and the cost incurred in obtaining the permission in the first place. They will then advise to market, at commencement of operations, a shorter period and expect to come in on the short end of that. Reabold for instance advised six to ten weeks for drilling the West Newton WNB1 and completed in 6 weeks before moving onto the sidetrack. This was drilled to 2250 m. We are side-tracking from about 1150m to a Measured Depth (including horizontal sections) of about 3000m or 1850 metres of drilling. Nor are we doing a well test which might extend the programme, because we are moving straight from drilling into production here, so there is no need for a well test. The hardest rock in Europe gives a rate of penetration of about 3m/hour (see page 6 of hxxps://pangea.stanford.edu/ERE/pdf/IGAstandard/SGW/2017/Baujard.pdf). That would imply 600 hours here or 25 days/3-4 weeks of continuous drilling. Even assuming the drilling was no more than half of the time advised, then to drill through this much granite would be only be 7 or 8 weeks. Granite of course wears drill bits faster and there is much changing of drilling equipment when addressing such hard rock. We are not drilling through granite in Cornwall or Scotland but through sandstones, clays, coals and limestones in Lincolnshire. We anticipate 20 odd days of 24/7 drilling – so a rate of penetration of over 12m/hour (verify by page 29 of Halco’s helpful graphs on rates of penetration hxxps://www.halco.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/A-Z-Drilling.pdf). Of course drilling is not the only workstream here, and even if we were to more than double the time, to suggest five to six weeks of work, we would actually expect the rig to be down inside that envelope. Things can go wrong and extend the timetable – we have always been frank about that – but this is a reasonable verifiable estimate. What disturbs me about assertions by this poster (and concert parties) – and they are hardly the first instances of obvious falsheoods deliberately spread – is that he holds himself out to be a knowledgeable investor and could have fact checked any of this with online sources in a matter of minutes. Worse still by claiming to have discovered an “internal̶1; company document he implies some great conspiracy by the Company and its Board, rather than sharing his source from the outset and pointing to the very obvious conclusion here: that people give themselves ample leeway in any official permission!
3put
19/10/2021
14:25
JT has asked me to put up the investor Q&A again
3put
19/10/2021
14:24
Your name vill also go on der list HITS.
1347
19/10/2021
14:12
JA - Thanks. I find them somewhat excruciating to have to watch or listen to but I've made a note of the source.
1347
19/10/2021
14:10
When will the oh so obviously deceptive morons next door realise that their ridiculous ramping attempts actually damage sentiment? Sincero, there *may* be some very few new IDs that are genuine PIs - but from what I'm seeing, at least 90% of the new or recently reappearing crop don't belong anywhere near that category. I'm also sure that, if you, I and anyone else were to make separate lists of blatantly obvious members of the disingenuous ramptastic squad, those lists would match nigh on exactly.
headinthesand
19/10/2021
14:01
uclot " "EXPECT" back in July... says it all to me!" now you are saying it wasn't vague then just because it suits your negative agenda...make your mind up ...... you are clearly really struggling mentally ....the resident window lickers have really got you in a complete mess ...make that call mind.org
sincero1
19/10/2021
13:57
"EXPECT" back in July... says it all to me! (IN)Sincerio: Surely you aren't suggesting that the Q & A's go out without our CEO's approval? There again, Lucan does have a habit of forgetting what he's said and written (as was proven by the drilling schedule fiasco recently) It was 16 weeks wasn't it? CQ ;-)
clottedq
19/10/2021
13:49
uclot - the question is vague " directors" .... " expect" is not a vague term. where does it say " reply from George Lucan " ...... go to the website and ask " Will George Lucan be buying some shares? " i appreciate that you are intellectually a bit slower than most but it is pretty straightforward and easy to do ...
sincero1
19/10/2021
13:47
I think the Cheerleader's PUMP has a slow puncture today... Sssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss CQ ;-)-------------------I would encourage anyone reading these forums or considering investing to stop and have a think about this post. Is this a post from somebody that wants Angs to succeed? Or its it the post from somebody betting against the share price?
3put
19/10/2021
13:42
(IN)Sincerio, I suggest you buy yourself a new pair of spectacles. DOH! Question asked on Angus Q & A on 28th July 2021: "Will any more directors be buying any more shares in the company considering current share price offers tremendous value?" Reply from George Lucan: "We cannot presuppose personal decisions by individual directors but we do expect to see further purchases." As I said: A VAGUE ANSWER GIVEN!... and NO purchases from Lucan afterwards... CQ ;-)
clottedq
19/10/2021
13:27
uclot - economical with the truth as usual .. try and think for yourself ....that was an interview...and i recall you slated the whole interview . don't be evasive ask the question on the website. why are you so scared ?
sincero1
19/10/2021
13:23
(IN)Sincerio... The question has already been asked and answered by Lucan (or did you not know?). He gave the "usual" vague response... FACT IS: He hasn't yet dipped into his own pocket... and the only directors who did, probably invested less between them than many private investors here. It hardly inspires investor confidence now does it? "Do what I say - NOT WHAT I DO" - seems to be the lesson Lucan is promoting here? CQ ;-)
clottedq
19/10/2021
13:19
oh look ja51"contractvoid"oilers is back....the sedation must have worn off... . old grey confused disingenuous ja51"contractvoid"oiler ...his posts as much use as an ashtray on a motorbike...
sincero1
19/10/2021
13:17
yawn.... the resident grey old halfwit window lickers keep banging on about lack of director buys . why don't they just ask on the angus investor questions website ? at least 2 uclot & 13reallyneedsahobby47 both claim to be shareholders... therefore why not ask the question ? so simple or are they not shareholders as they claim and just being mendacious?
sincero1
19/10/2021
13:15
1347 It was in the September 2020 conference call. Available on the Angus website. Stated they had been in discussions with a well-known high street bank since March.
ja51oiler
19/10/2021
13:09
I think the Cheerleader's PUMP has a slow puncture today... Sssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss CQ ;-)
clottedq
19/10/2021
12:50
Lucant will know the end game here is not to deliver value to the average shareholder and further dilution will be forthcoming, ergo he won't want to put his own hand in his rouser trouser and even if he did in the future it would be a sop. JT BTW Can you remind me where and when exactly Lucan stated he'd been discussing $20 m of debt funding with banks, can you reference the source please?
1347
Chat Pages: Latest  507  506  505  504  503  502  501  500  499  498  497  496  Older
ADVFN Advertorial
Your Recent History
LSE
ANGS
Angus Ener..
Register now to watch these stocks streaming on the ADVFN Monitor.

Monitor lets you view up to 110 of your favourite stocks at once and is completely free to use.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P: V: D:20211202 01:43:14