We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Angus Energy Plc | LSE:ANGS | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BYWKC989 | ORD GBP0.002 |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.425 | 0.40 | 0.45 | 0.425 | 0.425 | 0.43 | 1,102,248 | 07:46:26 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crude Petroleum & Natural Gs | 3.14M | -111.95M | -0.0309 | -0.14 | 15.21M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
08/10/2021 20:39 | OMG! I've unfiltered WhoCares to read what he's up to here... and... Drum roll please... I agree with him! This could((a... woulda shoulda) be the only way forward. I genuinely hope Lucan is listening? Go WhoCares!!! CQ ;-) | clottedq | |
08/10/2021 20:14 | JT it's of oirish origin so likely only used by Tinkers north of the wall. Also can you stop bringing up obstacles to the EGM, party pooper. | 1347 | |
08/10/2021 20:01 | Whocares765: they can’t necessarily do these things. The Lenders have charges on the assets and there are hedge contracts in place. At the very least, the Lenders would have to agree it all. | jtidsbadly | |
08/10/2021 19:59 | Should see a decent rise with first gas getting closer every day | 3put | |
08/10/2021 19:50 | 1347: If you’re referring to Mr. Syrup, the non-exec, and to Jonathan, I think he could do without either really. Eejut or eejit is equally current north of the border, as I understand it. Less affectionate than numpty. | jtidsbadly | |
08/10/2021 19:35 | Think some oirish slipped in there JT. Try numpty. Do you think cud will get the Bok & the Jock on board? | 1347 | |
08/10/2021 19:32 | Whocares765: I wouldn’t want to beard Mr. Manclark in his den and ask him to forgo his loan repayment. “Och, awa’ wi’ ye laddie. D’ye think me an eejut? And I want ma interest or I’ll sick the lawyers on ye. Whisht.” | jtidsbadly | |
08/10/2021 19:21 | Bionicdog: is that right? Wasn’t it reduced from 10% to 5% a few years ago? | jtidsbadly | |
08/10/2021 19:09 | Tell you what though, knows little to nothing about oil and gas, spouts a lot of nonsense and forecasts are wildly out, will almost be a like for like replacement yes? | 1347 | |
08/10/2021 19:08 | www.mind.org.uk all seek help | sincero1 | |
08/10/2021 19:07 | "If cudswallop gets control, is it worth a punt?" Yes if you have the right boat you can head off down the swanny.. | 1347 | |
08/10/2021 18:57 | JtiI've an engineering background ;) | whocares765 | |
08/10/2021 18:51 | 5% you can ask , but won't get. You need 10% to force an EGM | bionicdog | |
08/10/2021 18:31 | If cudswallop gets control, is it worth a punt? | jtidsbadly | |
08/10/2021 18:14 | Whoa...I seem to have returned to an alternative universe!?!" Have some of the cheerleaders swapped sides and become "stale bulls" "shorters" & "Martians" in my absence? Maybe the penny has finally dropped & now "EVERYONE" finally realises that the outcome here all depends upon DELIVERY by George & chums? Well it's going to be a struggle... because this BOD haven't any experience of SUCCESS... to date, but that's no reason for not holding them to account FINALLY! Forcing an EGM sounds like an excellent plan - to get to the truth at last - for private investors. CQ ;-) | clottedq | |
08/10/2021 18:13 | Is cud in charge yet? | 1347 | |
08/10/2021 17:05 | Answer: because the FCA has for years and years been very largely uninterested in anything AIM-related. They probably wait to be called into action by the AIM regulators - and that latter bunch of self-serving chocolate teapots are a complete and utter waste of time. Which is exactly why outfits like CTAG can get away with what they did for several years, before delisting with millions of PI pounds disappearing along with them and their executive board. | headinthesand | |
08/10/2021 17:00 | JA51: apologies, that should have been addressed to you. | jtidsbadly |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions