Angus Energy Share Discussion Threads

[jtidsbadly] 07/10/2021 20:13

Why would they want more shares? I’d want my money back. This chap (or one of them) thinks Knowe owns 10%! Mr. Manclark is in his 80s. Geothermal is going to be of limited interest.

[1347] 07/10/2021 20:06

Just had a look at Kansas South East, Cuddowivwhocareswholoses765 thinks the loan note holders (i.e. Knowe) are de-ramping/shorting. Could be on to something there, after all it would be in their interests (but no-one elses) wouldn't it so they could convert at a lower price and get more shares?

[whocares765] 07/10/2021 19:28

WOWSERS

STORAGE CAPACITY 15% OF UK NEEDS 10 YEARS AGO
Well then,

Pump out GAS asap and meanwhile set in train to expand UK core infrastructure to store gas...

It was 10 years - approval to WINGAS at Saltfleeby

Now how salivating is that, once production profile reduces aka 24 months time :)

[whocares765] 07/10/2021 18:46

Come onI knowThere is some much potentialANGUS ENERGY #ANGS just look at thisTelegram Group

[1347] 07/10/2021 18:24

I was beginning to wonder if Lucan and Biden might be related in some way? I say this because Sleepy Joe is also lurching from one disaster to another, could it be possible?

Also I notice the Prime Moron made a speech yesterday, seems to believe that if he repeats a few catchy phrases all will come good. He really is totally clueless, I wonder if they can get a refund on those school fees?

[jtidsbadly] 07/10/2021 18:14

1347: cryptic..

[clottedq] 07/10/2021 18:01

HITS...

I think you are the "exception" rather than the rule... but I am sincerely delighted for you nevertheless.

At my current average I fear I will be sold down the river with the rest of the fixtures & fittings...

CQ ;-)

[1347] 07/10/2021 17:50

JT It's not about the success or otherwise of the Earls of Hazard, you'll see, but most likely not until early next year.

[sincero1] 07/10/2021 17:49

hits - angs is not ukog...the comparison is not valid..you know I'm underwater on my ukog investment but self respect stops me posting negatively on that board......I see the "pump and dump " claim is being spouted again.. so disingenuous or just the ramblings of a loon .. a simple check of traded volumes recently tells you that..if only some could think for themselves...clearly those with a below average intelligence really do just blindly follow and are preyed upon unscrupulously...

[clottedq] 07/10/2021 17:28

JT,

It's a gamble and a high stakes one at that IMHO. If the share price climbs from current levels... it will most likely be riding the crest of a pump & dump wave to get those warrants exercised IMHO!

Problem is, the MM's usually force such a wide spread and due to low general liquidity the stock is often very hard to trade - as I discovered to my dismay in the past.

Anyone buying in now will be used to replenish the lobster-pot for sure, but just like Hotel California: "they will NEVER leave!"

CQ ;-)

[jtidsbadly] 07/10/2021 16:56

“Loss recovery” has more than a hint of resignation about it. I think we all realise that there is theoretically a possibility that they’ll get the required permissions promptly, be allowed to drill the sidetrack while the gas plant is being built/coming on stream, that production and price will be high enough to enable them to meet their debts as they fall due. Few of us rate the chances of this combination of factors very highly, though. Bitter experience. What little the stale bulls on here have left from this still-unfolding fiasco is essentially option money. You have to be in it to win it, innit?

[clottedq] 07/10/2021 16:44

1347,

LOL! :-)

When I look at my Anguish share investment it's thoroughly depressing (it has been for years now... and got a whole lot worse when Lucan popped up and trashed a further 90% off its value!)

You have to try to see the funny side sometimes... it's good for moral... and "CHRIST" DO WE NEED A MORAL BOOST as long term investors here!

CQ ;-)

[3put] 07/10/2021 16:43

Loss recovery requires the share price to go up. Hopefully I have bought in at the bottom.

[1347] 07/10/2021 16:36

CQ isn't 'investing' it's more an attempt at 'loss recovery'. This is difficult due to the hoplesness and disingenuity of the BoD, led by the Earls of Hazard. I note the comments by the ocebot, it's quite an ironic juxtaposition really, Kansas now being the land of fantasy, whereas here in Oz there's more reality. All together now...

Somewhere over the rainbow, way up high......

[bionicdog] 07/10/2021 16:31

A Telegram group of deluded idiots losing money.
Where do I sign up?

[3put] 07/10/2021 16:10

Why are you still invested ClottedQ?

[whocares765] 07/10/2021 16:06

I knowThere is some much potentialANGUS ENERGY #ANGS just look at thisTelegram Group

[clottedq] 07/10/2021 16:05

Botcelot: "the naysayers are simply hanging around because they are intrigued by Angus's potential."

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL... yes that's why we're here... because we're all INTRIGUED by the POTENTIAL LOLOLOLOLOL!

You couldn't make this stuff up could you? It's "Comedy Gold!"

I think you'll find most LTH's (naysayers... if you insist) have found themselves hoodwinked by this company and its empty promises over the years.If we're still here it's certainly not by choice.

+ it looks like Angus are desperately dropping some fresh lobster-pots overboard - to dredge in a fresh batch of newbie investors who will inevitably be swelling our (naysayer) ranks - given time!

CQ ;-)

[3put] 07/10/2021 15:40

What's the other channel?

[clottedq] 07/10/2021 15:32

DoneK: "every share has its portion of naysayers, which is healthy for discussion and debate, but ANGs has got some next level naysayers...
their predictions of doom and gloom have been going for years."

This comment from the other channel made me laugh... I don't suppose those predictions of "doom & gloom going on for years" have had anything to do with this company's unbroken 100% record of Failure during that time?

Why, surely... this must just be a complete coincidence?

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

CQ ;-)

[headinthesand] 07/10/2021 15:16

Sincero "I agree its a tricky one but that is what the directors are paid for ...."

One would indeed hope so... but to (sadly) prove that this isn't invariably the case across all AIM micro-cap O&G companies, I would refer the witness to Sando and the directors of the UKOG board.

[sincero1] 07/10/2021 14:56

uclot - so disingenuous and mentally ill it is then ..... seek help ..seriously ....