Angus Energy Share Discussion Threads

[sincero1] 22/7/2021 15:25

jtisadly is best ignored."....lets have a brief recap of his recent posting ...pretty clear he is clueless and totally discredited .... brown slacks on standby re your mercuria posts...
5.7.21 "placing this week or next"
8.7.21"another placing or two in the next few months"
9.7.21 "" placing is in the queue and will come once the latest UKOG issue has been digested"
14.7.21 ""I'm expecting two placings this year"
"I'm expecting two placings this year"
21.5.21 "poor angus 0.20 soon" 8+ weeks ago.
" share price into the sixties shortly " 6+ weeks ago.
"oga approval doubt" .
" financing doubt" .
" running out of money " weekly prediction for last 6 months.
" 0.15 by end of year".
" placing soon " daily prediction for last 6 months.
"its a pump & dump" - it wasn't.
"They did run out of money towards the end of March, as we predicted" - As at 31 March 2021 the Group had cash of £591,000. As at 31 March 2021 the Group had net current assets of £1,351,000".
Here are a few of jtisadly's comment regarding mercuria:
"If Mercuria has written the hedge contracts, Anguish may fall into their hands"
"it's going to cost Mercuria lots of money"
"Maybe they can use Anguish's tax losses"
"I expect Mercuria to want Anguish to have more placings"
"I dare say Mercuria will be getting all its original demands met"
"I expect the loan terms to stipulate release of funds as and when needed and subject to Mercuria's specific approval"
"Id be surprised if we don't see the appointment of a Mercuria person as a Director there very shortly."
"The proposed loan terms are unaffordable. Mercuria must have something else in mind"
"For someone like Mercuria, this is a no-brainer. Tax losses that make pulling the plug on Anguish pretty well risk-free if they can't make money on the gas"

[ultimatejustice9] 22/7/2021 13:54

Feels like we have a background buyer here. Not going to take much to get this going.

[sincero1] 22/7/2021 11:45

jtisadly - this is the angs board not aaog ... i know they start with the same letter and you are below average intelligence so its an easy mistake to make i guess...

[jtidsbadly] 22/7/2021 11:36

It appears from a conversation on the AAOG site that the 2020 Report and Accounts on the company’s website are correct but that the copy filed at Companies House is last year’s!

[jtidsbadly] 22/7/2021 11:05

The Chairman’s review appears to have been a repetition of her 2019 effort, which they’ve now corrected. I’ve never seen that happen before either. Egg on someone’s face this morning.

[jtidsbadly] 22/7/2021 10:35

.. by the way, the accounts are made up to 31 December 2020. But the Chairman’s report is dated 8 September. That’s the first time I’ve seen such a report written more than 3 months before the accounts were made up and ten months before the report and accounts were revealed.

[jtidsbadly] 22/7/2021 10:30

JA51: the AAOG accounts are up on the Companies House site. Appalling. It has to be about “tax losses”, doesn’t it?

I can’t get into the other site to post comment. I wonder if this is an alternative on their part to a site-wide ban. I shall keep trying..

[sincero1] 21/7/2021 19:12

jtisadly...the king of supposition as long as its negative....

[jtidsbadly] 21/7/2021 17:11

JA51: a 20/12020 article following announcement of his extending limited finance to AAOG said this:

“Paul Forrest, Chief Executive of Forum, commented, “Forum is pleased to have taken a strategic stake in the Company and we are looking forward to working with the Board to create shareholder value. Forum has, through its investors and network, access to sources of funding as well as exciting and viable projects in the natural resources sector that could be suitable as acquisition targets for AAOG.”

A pity his investors and network didn't fancy Poundland, instead preferring this turkey.

Presumably the lenders to Anguish/Poundland will be watching what’s going on here. SEL won’t be able to shuffle its interest in Poundland - they’re guarantors of the financing and have the charges registered to prove it. Not without the approval of the lenders, anyway.

[ja51oiler] 21/7/2021 16:33

interesting news on AAOG from companies house.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

21 Jul 2021 Resolutions

Resolution of allotment of securities
Resolution of removal of pre-emption rights
Accounts and reports received / auditor and director reappointed / authority to make market purchases 06/07/2021

This document is being processed and will be available in 10 days.


--------------------------------------------------------------------




Nothing still on MR F's other 2 companies involved here. I hope he's alright?

[sincero1] 21/7/2021 12:28

HITS "The fact that the ANGS share price is currently in freefall and heading very determinedly and rapidly in the exact wrong direction" .... a slight exaggeration ... shares traded very low, all markets have been down recently particularly oil & gas .... Hits don't make me put you in the window licker pigeon hole....yellow card for you .. another and its red ...in you go....

[sincero1] 21/7/2021 12:03

jtisadly is best ignored."....lets have a brief recap of his recent posting ...pretty clear he is clueless and totally discredited .... brown slacks on standby re your mercuria posts...
5.7.21 "placing this week or next"
8.7.21"another placing or two in the next few months"
9.7.21 "" placing is in the queue and will come once the latest UKOG issue has been digested"
14.7.21 ""I'm expecting two placings this year"
"I'm expecting two placings this year"
21.5.21 "poor angus 0.20 soon" 8+ weeks ago.
" share price into the sixties shortly " 6+ weeks ago.
"oga approval doubt" .
" financing doubt" .
" running out of money " weekly prediction for last 6 months.
" 0.15 by end of year".
" placing soon " daily prediction for last 6 months.
"They did run out of money towards the end of March, as we predicted" - As at 31 March 2021 the Group had cash of £591,000. As at 31 March 2021 the Group had net current assets of £1,351,000".
Here are a few of jtisadly's comment regarding mercuria:
"If Mercuria has written the hedge contracts, Anguish may fall into their hands"
"it's going to cost Mercuria lots of money"
"Maybe they can use Anguish's tax losses"
"I expect Mercuria to want Anguish to have more placings"
"I dare say Mercuria will be getting all its original demands met"
"I expect the loan terms to stipulate release of funds as and when needed and subject to Mercuria's specific approval"
"Id be surprised if we don't see the appointment of a Mercuria person as a Director there very shortly."
"The proposed loan terms are unaffordable. Mercuria must have something else in mind"
"For someone like Mercuria, this is a no-brainer. Tax losses that make pulling the plug on Anguish pretty well risk-free if they can't make money on the gas"

[clickbait] 21/7/2021 10:30

It's days like this that I sometimes wish I'd taken the blue pill....

[jtidsbadly] 21/7/2021 09:47

...also, re Jonathan, does anyone know if he’s got any shares in this now? Or if he’s still employed at Anguish? The “management221; page on the website doesn’t include him, though it does their Operations Director (non-Board). If Jonathan is still employed as Business Development Director, how can his omission from the management page be explained?

[headinthesand] 21/7/2021 08:11

Well... I can still barely contain my excitement waiting for the nailed-on "5p by year end!" prediction from rmarts/torreaguas... or even the "3p for sure!" assurances from backwater share tipster cantrememberthis2/cuddothisnow. I'm almost looking forward to having egg all over my face for having decided to escape the ANGS lobsterpot at 1p...

The fact that the ANGS share price is currently in freefall and heading very determinedly and rapidly in the exact wrong direction is I am sure just an irrelevance. I mean, what can the opinion of the market possibly be worth in comparison to the boundless (and selfless) acumen of our two resident and ramptastic cheerleaders?

[clickbait] 20/7/2021 13:15

A bit of volume and this could fly or dive bomb depending on which way the wind blows?

[sincero1] 20/7/2021 11:17

jtisadly "I think anyone reading this bb by now will have realised that this shill is best ignored." pahahaha..lets have a brief recap of your recent posting ...pretty clear who should be ignored....... brown slacks on standby re your mercuria posts...
5.7.21 "placing this week or next"
8.7.21"another placing or two in the next few months"
9.7.21 "" placing is in the queue and will come once the latest UKOG issue has been digested"
14.7.21 ""I'm expecting two placings this year"
"I'm expecting two placings this year"
21.5.21 "poor angus 0.20 soon" 8+ weeks ago.
" share price into the sixties shortly " 6+ weeks ago.
"oga approval doubt" .
" financing doubt" .
" running out of money " weekly prediction for last 6 months.
" 0.15 by end of year".
" placing soon " daily prediction for last 6 months.
"They did run out of money towards the end of March, as we predicted" - As at 31 March 2021 the Group had cash of £591,000. As at 31 March 2021 the Group had net current assets of £1,351,000".
Here are a few of jtisadly's comment regarding mercuria:
"If Mercuria has written the hedge contracts, Anguish may fall into their hands"
"it's going to cost Mercuria lots of money"
"Maybe they can use Anguish's tax losses"
"I expect Mercuria to want Anguish to have more placings"
"I dare say Mercuria will be getting all its original demands met"
"I expect the loan terms to stipulate release of funds as and when needed and subject to Mercuria's specific approval"
"Id be surprised if we don't see the appointment of a Mercuria person as a Director there very shortly."
"The proposed loan terms are unaffordable. Mercuria must have something else in mind"
"For someone like Mercuria, this is a no-brainer. Tax losses that make pulling the plug on Anguish pretty well risk-free if they can't make money on the gas"

[ja51oiler] 20/7/2021 09:36

Thinking about its not just "David" who will want His money! As you can see the Knowe charge registered against Angus also stops them from doing anything in that regard. Until they get that £1.4 million CLN paid back one way or another by next April!

[sincero1] 20/7/2021 09:12

ja51"contractvoid"oiler ... stop soiling yourself, stop trying to convince yourself and think before you post .........but best get those brown slacks on ... its fine , probably ... how is the sleep these days ?

[ja51oiler] 20/7/2021 08:59

Clueless "Moron" Just read the restrictions placed.

[sincero1] 20/7/2021 08:04

ja51"contractvoid"oiler " David is going to want his share of the £12 million he has already lent to Angus paid back before that happens!" "not £30 which it is going to be!!"...All complete supposition ... you are brave putting that on a public website.... especially after your "contract void " post previously ......good luck....brown slacks on standby

[jtidsbadly] 19/7/2021 23:23

JA51: I think anyone reading this bb by now will have realised that this shill is best ignored.

Anguish are unlikely to make nearly enough money from the two producing wells operating for two months to repay the first instalment of the Mercuria loan, what? That will be £3mm. plus £1.5mm of interest. That’s assuming they can place shares sufficient to pay back Knowe in April (£1.45 capital+interest). Then there’s the g&a expenses not covered by the loan. And they hadn’t even completed the design work on the plant, the last thing we heard. A really competent management would struggle to meet their timetables and budgets - and would still need a great deal of luck with the sidetrack. And the lenders are watching on, unconcerned really. Whatever happens, they’ll be making money, I suspect. Assuming they've found a way of using those tax losses.