Angus Energy Share Discussion Threads

[chickndinner] 06/4/2021 23:42

JT. How can we keep doing placings? There is nothing to justify it!

They need a minimum of £12 million to get SF to 1st gas. Everything else is just a cash cow!!!

[jtidsbadly] 06/4/2021 23:20

chickndinner: they’ve never had much in the way of cash flow, they've financed themselves (sic) with placings. Cash must be near nil, I think - they must be close to living on creditors. They need another placing. Or a loan. I’d be happy to debate this on here with Anguish or its PR people. They’re not up for it, though. It’s not very surprising. Their policy seems to be, if you haven’t got a clue, try as hard as you can to distract people who have, until a loan materialises or the plug is pulled. The thing is, who’s going to lend money to this shower to finance Poundland?

[wolfofthewoods] 06/4/2021 22:55

Wait for the cheerleaders, biggest placing nod going

[chickndinner] 06/4/2021 22:30

Cashflow must be low by now?

[wolfofthewoods] 06/4/2021 22:19

Being a gimp is an ugly trait

[chickndinner] 06/4/2021 22:00

Still no funding?

TICK TOCK ⏰

[sincero1] 06/4/2021 17:00

true to form jtsibadly can't back up another statement that some may interpret as fact . wait for back track clarification to follow in due course.

[jtidsbadly] 06/4/2021 16:41

HITS: since the extended 90-day exclusivity period for the new boys expired yesterday, should we expect a rush to Chiswick by bankers, bearing wads of cash?

As for the date of Anguish’s loss of going concern status, I’m surprised she’d need to ask. I’m sure everyone would prefer to get it from the horse’s mouthpiece. Over to her..

[headinthesand] 06/4/2021 16:24

Sincero, you'll really need to do an awful lot better than that with any trite ad hominem approach, if you're looking to get any rise out of me.

Do bear in mind that one man's bitterness is another man's realism - and I'll stick with the recorded facts on ANGS in terms of what it has or hasn't achieved and what they and they alone evidence, if that's all the same to you. Or even if it's not, for that matter.

Y'all have a nice day now.

[sincero1] 06/4/2021 15:16

jtisbadly " Its race is almost run" care to put a date on that ? i bet you can't ....

another empty meaningless post from a non shareholder with motives unknown .

by the way , where is sheepofthewoods ? maybe "tied up " tee hee

[sincero1] 06/4/2021 14:20

hits trying to back up jtissbadly after he corrected you on the salary post ...that is interesting. we all know what jtisbadly meant by his comment ... your attempt to justify it reflects badly on you , but that said so do a lot of your posts. bitterness is an ugly trait .

[jtidsbadly] 06/4/2021 13:59

HITS: I think she’s merely a mouthpiece of a mendacious client or employer. What a way to scratch a living! Best ignored, what? I mean to say.

You’re right though!

Ocelot is correct, too - for once - in her quotation from the interim MD. Anguish is in the last furlong. Its race is almost run.

[headinthesand] 06/4/2021 13:51

Sincero, you seriously think that all assets must by default have a value? Well, that is true - but only mathematically speaking, since it's quite possible for assets to have positive, zero or negative values. They're all still values.

Have you really never come across zero value assets? You can't have seen or understood many balance sheets then... or, even leaving aside company reporting, understand a simple concept like negative equity either, for that matter.

[sincero1] 06/4/2021 13:14

jtiscbadly "their assets have no value.."


definition of an asset "an asset is a resource with value"

jtisbadly getting so desperate to attack anything about this company that he is now changing the definition of words to suit .....

[jtidsbadly] 06/4/2021 11:17

..the interim MD must be kicking himself for not trying Credit Suisse.

[jtidsbadly] 06/4/2021 10:48

JA51: no loan, no update. Thirteen months since they started doing the rounds of the banks looking for one. How much more time will their advisers allow them? They’re clearly close to a going concern deadline, their assets have no value and they need yet another placing. Their idea of PR in this situation is to send trolls to post content-free verbiage to bulletin boards. The game is nearly up here, what? Absolutely. I hope there’s enough left for those April salaries.

[ja51oiler] 06/4/2021 10:30

No comment on the Brockham F-up then gents?..... I guess that would be constructive though, wouldn't it?

Do you think those "alleged" softly committed investors would have been impressed with the latest bit of incompetence??

[sincero1] 06/4/2021 09:08

morning ladies, hope you enjoyed your break, oops already doing it, sorry, every day is a holiday for you oldies isn't it . well i had a quick look at the posts. interesting that JTisbadly is now making a point of correcting others , in this case the grumpy disgruntled HITS pay post . clearly ja51 ( i see he posted when he thought the coast was clear ) misguided ramblings have bothered jtisbadly and he doesn't want to get caught up in anything. Chicken was very quiet , although not so on the BOO board - ouch . Sheepofthewoods nowhere to be seen ... i think we can all guess what he was up to .. dirty boy !

[ukneonboy] 03/4/2021 19:43

it actually gets even funnier, if you read 🐔🐔CHICKEN DIMWIT's 🐔🐔 postings on the Greatland Gold message board.



he's clearly "IN DEEP, VERY LONG & VERY WRONG" as well as being clueless, talking sh*te, and trying (unsuccessfully) to make himself look smart, posting his fantasies about an imaginary recovery in the GGP share price and an imaginary bear squeeze.



Hashtag: Put your hat back on 🐔🐔, and we'll all laugh at YOU again !!!

[johncasey] 03/4/2021 00:53

buy vog next week.. 5 bagger

[chickndinner] 02/4/2021 22:16

A great boss. Give us a job..

[jtidsbadly] 02/4/2021 18:53

HITS: well, the Earl of Lucan had just been appointed interim MD and needed to keep his senior team together, what was left of it - and loyal to him. He may have erred on the side of generosity in bestowing promotions to the Board and increased salaries on Carlos and Hollis but he ensured himself of their loyalty. With the Earl of Clanwilliam appointed as Chairman, he ensured himself of a fully compliant Board. The Poundland decision was clearly his own.

[headinthesand] 02/4/2021 18:16

You may be right on the salary issue, JTids - but even if you are, all that does is beg a different but equally difficult question.

With what justification were Fernandes and Hollis promoted to the board (with presumably accompanying nice fat pay rises)?

Certainly not on any merit basis, as is clearly evidenced by the fact that ANGS had never achieved or delivered on any single thing whatsoever when they were appointed. Also one cannot help but consider the subsequent many months of total, unredeemed and abject non-delivery ever since said appointments...

[jtidsbadly] 02/4/2021 17:50

JA51: I should think the discussions you mention re Jonathan probably related to his loan, which was repaid in the first quarter last year, wasn’t it? I wonder if his salary changed with his job description. He was Operations Director, then became Business Development Director (both non-Board) when they hired someone with operations skills.