Anglo African Oil & Gas Share Discussion Threads

[laptop15] 25/1/2020 19:21

https://twitter.com/laptop1515/status/1220699056936300544?s=19

[seagreen] 24/1/2020 15:23

nutty1 it must be connected with the new strategic investor Forum Energy who ever they be as they bought out the overhang from the "ISA" from the funds who will presumably reverse a new asset in here as it will not have much left other than a 20% option in the original project and the put and call option. So if your patient who knows what this will become the other group must have had to walk off into the sunset. If anything half decent came in here and they got some money from the put and call option it could be happy days...quite a cheap way to buy a shell, which seem like gold dust.

[aaogplc] 24/1/2020 15:00

Also his name is MacDonald he gets very very upset with bad spelling

[aaogplc] 24/1/2020 14:53

Perhaps they already know!

[nutty1] 24/1/2020 13:02

aaogplg,

You're probably right, I might never see the contents of any agreements or the contents of the claim.

But I bet any buyer or budding replacement management group such as Align/Alexander McDonald will want to know whats gone on and what the possible exposures are.

Fools if they don't.......

[aaogplc] 24/1/2020 10:57

What are you talking about? Fool

[dudishes] 24/1/2020 10:18

Seagreen told us private BB from Day BB. He forgot to use cryptography, easy to access, no one on it! Tells you a story what?

[dudishes] 24/1/2020 05:16

Seagreen and Harps maybe?

[aaogplc] 23/1/2020 22:06

What is the point in speculating on the content of an agreement that you will never see. What possible relevance does this now have. It is game over. Unless........

[nutty1] 23/1/2020 21:22

Seagreen
While you and Ms Cope may ultimately be correct in saying that the Askell case has no merit, I think there are one or two questions that need to be addressed before we can say that unequivocably.

1) Was there a contract between AAOG and Askell and did it include non-disclosure and non-compete agreements?

2) Did the contract extend to affiliated companies?

3) Was ATOG an AAOG-affiliated company at the time the Medco Tunisia deal completed in November?

4) Is ATOG still an AAOG-affiliated company?

At the risk of being told in no uncertain terms what ‘assumptions’ are, I am going to assume that Askell had some kind of Finders Fee/Bonus arrangement in place to be paid at the time the sale of the Medco Tunisia assets completed.

I cannot believe that there wouldn’t have been a NDA/Non-compete clause in place, neither can I believe that they would not extend to affiliate companies or people. These are standard clauses.

If it can be demonstrated that 1), 2) and 3) above have occurred, then I think AAOG has a case to answer when it comes to breach of confidentiality or non-compete.

If you think AAOG has no case, and the above have occurred, then NDAs are about as much use as toilet paper and it makes a nice blueprint for ripping off other organisations.

Still, I don't know the answers and you may be right, Seagreen.

Time, and possibly the courts, will tell..

[aaogplc] 22/1/2020 11:06

Wrong Oxford??

[apfindley] 22/1/2020 09:37

Oh dear. Is it more proof the oxford energy was just a front for certain people to hide behind to try and gain control of aaog?Accounts overdue. Oxford no history. Red flagged. And now registered address removed and reverted to c/h Cardiff.All those crying out loud in favour of that alternative deal , may well have had a vested interest in it.

[dudishes] 21/1/2020 06:39

Seagreen, another whoops!

His ramping on losers (deguised in parallel with Son's accident), bull. I will remind you, that he used his Son's accident as an excuse for failures stock exchange, rather odd what?

As for failure ADVFN BLUE thread, all had lost their money. Pretty clear by what they were placing shares? Doddy has removed most, for that apparent reason.

Get real!

[costax1654x] 20/1/2020 15:52

orm expecting a great week,with the seller out!Mcap of 3 mil can not justify 5.5 mil cash and another asset without debts!Feel Sorry for previous shareholders who got the -70% drop after the sell of tungsten mine,but cash is twice the mcap without debts!

[apfindley] 20/1/2020 15:51

Read the rns it will answer your question.It's quite amusing they put that trade on the market.

[sbb1x] 20/1/2020 15:40

What is that 84 million trade ?

[nash81] 20/1/2020 11:16

going back down! what will be the future of AAOG ?

[seagreen] 20/1/2020 10:28

Lets raise a glass to the future of that well known Rum

Captain?

[seagreen] 20/1/2020 10:26

PS the CV of "Captain" (sic) James Berwick and his previous careeer and his military experience on Linkedin (see below) really ought to be checked out with the French Foreign Legion and 2nd Battalion of the Parachute Regiment as whilst it might not be relevant to his future in the oil industry I gather one or two members of 2nd Para are having great dificulty recollecting a "Captain" (sic) James Berwick ever being in 2nd Para of his age and experience...apparently this claim was also brought to the attention of Mr Sefton.....

Presumably Finncap must have carried out their basic due dilligence (as others have) on his appointment as CEO of AAOG or we are really dealing with two rotten eggs who have destroyed AAOG and harmed other Directors careers for the future.

I am almost too scared of ringing up 2nd Para....surely it can not be true?


hxxps://www.linkedin.com/in/james-berwick-771b2111/

2eme Regiment Etranger de Parachutistes

Company Name

French Foreign Legion
Dates Employed 1994 – 2001
Employment Duration 7 yrs
HM Forces Parachute Regiment
2nd Battalion the Parachute Regiment

Company Name

HM Forces Parachute Regiment
Dates Employed 1989 – 1994
Employment Duration 5 yrs

[seagreen] 20/1/2020 08:59

FWI I could not be the author..I totaly disagree Officer Digby with Shareprophets and I think the Askell lawsuit almost certainly has no merit under UK law and Ms Cope is right. (She is not stupid and has a first rate knowledge of law being an x QE) AAOG have no benefit accrued to them from the ATOG transaction what so ever only a liability to recover costs. I think the lawsuit is typical of a US oil advisory firm and the only claim they may have would be against ATOG and or Sefton and Berwick the rogue x employees who stole the asset. The legal entity AAOG and the shareholders of AAOG have zero benefit and turned down the asset and did not consumate the deal, any finders fee or commission due would be success related only. So I think Share Prophets are talking balls on this issue, which is rare and are talking their own negative PR story up in a rather News of the World third rate fashion and its shoddy sensational journalism. Shame on them.