Andalas Energy And Power Share Discussion Threads

[therealtonythetiger] 04/9/2018 18:07

hxxps://www.voxmarkets.co.uk/articles/phoenix-global-mining-ananda-developments-d01cadd

24 minutes 45 seconds in...

[euclid5] 04/9/2018 11:23

Optiva Twitter note below

$23m value

[billyboychrisd] 03/9/2018 22:29

Thank you for that valuable insight.

[sweet karolina] 03/9/2018 20:52

All those multiples of 100k sells are either dumping of the last placing, LO dumping or forward selling or all 3. Keep buying mug punters

[pre] 03/9/2018 10:26

This has significant upside imo with Badger and Bunga Mas stake recently taken...still trading at peanuts and i expect further value to be realised here...we have new CEO who is determined to deliver value imo:-)

[oilbuy] 03/9/2018 09:30

CORO deal shows ADL in an undervalued light !

[sweet karolina] 02/9/2018 23:36

I see some morons who can't do proper research think because some billionaire used to be PSC at Holywell it is all going to work out well.



Cessation of Victor Yiou Hwa Hwang as a person with significant control on 11 April 2016

Last filed accounts for Holywell: Net current liabilities £147,880

Holywell now 100% owned by Eagle.

Who owns 75% of Eagle?



1 active person with significant control / 0 active statements
Mr Paul Haywood



Runs NEX listed Block Energy PLC



No super yachts here. Research really is not that hard, but is vital if you don't want to lose all your money.

[asdg2f] 02/9/2018 18:40

Beware of Sweet karolina, he has multiple accounts to push his agenda.

Aiden Earley is going to take his master TW down.

[sweet karolina] 02/9/2018 12:30

Thanks for that Tony can't type much as I am still laughing too much. Justin the Clown is the best.

Here is a link that works from here:



More like 25 mins in

[therealtonythetiger] 02/9/2018 12:03

Justin has changed his tune..:-)

The Weekend Podcast..24min 30 seconds in..
hxxps://audioboom.com/posts/6991454-the-weekend-podcast?utm_campaign=detailpage&utm_content=retweet&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

[sweet karolina] 01/9/2018 14:11

Euclid,



"Surely London's most useless Nomad Roland "Fatty" Cornish has to force Andalas to restate what it had said and to stop doing podcasts with PR genius Steffi and Vox markets where it is quite simply talking utter bull.
Any company behaving this way is 100% uninvestable. Andalas is not fit to be on the AIM Casino and any Nomad other than Fatty would, at this stage, be handing in its resignation letter. I will be taking this to AIM Regulation over the weekend and perhaps Fatty will do the decent thing and walk. If the AIM casino is to be even vaguely credible this issue MUST be resolved ahead of any further fundraising."

That would seem to cover "report him to the authorities" and it proves me wrong in my view that he was sticking to AIM rules.

How are you getting on with:

"As you are a shareholder and I am not and you believe in "email him directly to question / correct him"

Please let us know what response you get when you ask him why he failed to mention this in his RNS and subsequent podcast."

[sweet karolina] 31/8/2018 17:46

Euclid,

So you bought £500 worth as a punt which you do not give a monkeys about in a company which you now consider:

"It's so obvious this is a dog of a co. & a dodgy BoD's so all confidence has gone"

Yet you waste time writing long posts, challenging someone who has the same view. Ok that is different.

I took the trouble to reply fully to your previous long post and will do so again, because you are articulate and the discussion is interesting, unlike most of the drivel that gets posted on here. We might both learn something that helps us with our own investing.

"So exactly what mistakes am I making please?"

Firstly you do not read what is written properly eg:

If you feel the below is correct, report him to the authorities, or email him directly to question / correct him

"I have to give Gorringe credit where it is due and I feel his RNSs do meet the requirements of AIM rule 10"

Why would I report him for following the rules? I know it is rare on AIM and rules 10 and 11 are the ones most often breached, but to report the odd ones who do follow them seems extreme!

Secondly you do not question properly. I answered the question you asked with "BP and Shell" and said you had asked the wrong question, you then go off on an diatribe, because you asked the wrong question in the first place.

Thirdly you do not analyse logically or critically and go off on tangents. I never questioned the volume figures for the resources. I specifically questioned the GCOS figures ADL had done from what the operator said, which are actually the most important to look at when dealing with undiscovered resources ie ones you do not know even exist.

Do you know what GCOS stands for and in particular what the implications of the G means within that? From your arguments, I suspect you do not. Also why are you impressed that the common standard has been used (I read the RNS - that note should not really need saying) but you are not concerned about the degree of independence and competence of the people who provided the data and of those who did the assessment? so the forth mistake you make is you do not have the background knowledge or critical thinking skills to assess properly the information you are reading and then cutting and pasting to support your argument.

The fifth mistake you make is you make assumptions that suit your point of view, rather than ones which would inform your point of view if you made the effort to challenge any of your own assumptions. In short you suffer badly from confirmation bias and that drives quite a few of your earlier mistakes.

The other mistake you may also make, but it might only be with your argument on ADL because you do not give a monkey's about your small punt, is you do not do your own research to find independent corroborative / contradictory evidence to confirm or deny what the company says in its RNSs. This is a fatal mistake if you are making it elsewhere.

Let's move on to Badger. Why do you think Gorringe released an RNS about the seismic reprocessing when the other listed partner, who has a bigger stake than ADL, does not consider the results to be conclusive and is continuing with its own assessment and quite rightly will only inform its shareholders when the results are reliable and material?



"License P2112 (Badger field) is one coming from Atlantic Petroleum’s past and with a higher risk profile than projects being considered now (see Note 1 below). The Company is a 33% equity partner alongside Holywell, and together has invested, during this report period, into reprocessing of existing seismic data. The outcome is anticipated as being higher resolution geophysical detail and ability to better risk grade reserve structure and potential. Once this work is complete (planned for mid August) a period of specialist interpretation occurs and Atlantic Petroleum will temporarily engage its own technical expert to determine whether there is upgraded asset value and justification for involvement in physical appraisal work."

As you are a shareholder and I am not and you believe in "email him directly to question / correct him"

Please let us know what response you get when you ask him why he failed to mention this in his RNS and subsequent podcast.