We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Active Asset Capital Limited | AAA | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 53.00 | 01:00:00 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53.00 | 53.00 |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 15/4/2024 14:03 by daddycoold Robert not Richard. AAA will do placing after placing to friends of the new self appointed BOD and themselves. One day Sentiance is worth 10M the next it's worth 100s of M. Aaa with their 31% share will try and maximise their new friends position in AAA by diluting into infinity current AAA shareholders through issuance and placing of new shares. They're offering existing shareholders prorata shares at 2p, to show to FCA that they're acting fair. But they're not are they ? They haven't produced a investor case to current shareholders, accounts for the period, nor have they described what is prorata. It's pretty obvious the current BOD and some other significants (with a u) are stealing the company from under everyone's noses. The FCA won't protect you. Only thing shareholders can do is join up and force an EGM and get rid of the grabbing hands. |
Posted at 15/4/2024 09:25 by vatacarma Why are the directors keeping everyone in the dark ?If they want a successful outcome they should: Inform investors of how many shares the directors are buying Publish up to date financial statements Up date shareholders on the case against Richard Bonnier |
Posted at 13/4/2024 14:43 by mudbath To all shareholdersSentiance update Introduction In October 2023 AAA increased its holding in its key portfolio investment Sentiance N.V.(‘Sentianc Since then, Sentiance has continued to make significant ongoing commercial and corporate progress and, as a result, AAA has recently sought to raise new funding to make additional investment into Sentiance. As detailed below, AAA has received firm commitments from new and existing investors to raise £1.75m cash through the placing of 87.5m new AAA shares at 2p per share (the ‘Placing’ The Board of AAA believes that further increasing the Company’s holding in Sentiance will be of significant benefit to AAA’s shareholders. The Company believes that Sentiance and its AI platform technology have the potential to become substantially more valuable in the future. As detailed below, this fundraising is now being extended to all existing AAA shareholders meaning they can, at a minimum, follow their own pro rata entitlement to acquire new shares in an open offer to raise up to a further £1.75m cash through the issue of up to 87.5m new AAA shares at 2p per share (the ‘Open Offer’). Fundraising Through the Placing, AAA has already received firm commitments to raise £1.75m through the issue of 87.5m new ordinary shares at 2p each, which alongside the matching Open Offer to raise up to £1.75m through the issue of 87.5m new ordinary shares at 2p each, would mean a total fundraising of up to £3.5m (the ‘Fundraising&# The proceeds of the Fundraising will be used primarily to acquire additional new, and potentially secondary, equity in Sentiance. This new funding will go towards financing a number of planned corporate and operational developments at Sentiance during 2024. Any balance of funds raised in the Fundraising will be used to finance AA’s ongoing working capital. |
Posted at 21/10/2023 16:17 by a0460502 hxxps://aaacap.com/i |
Posted at 09/10/2023 10:38 by daddycoold AAA was groomed by RB as a vehicle to find his whimsical effort to establish Aaqua. Which as we know failed. As he also groomed Monchichi, and stole the shares of its investors for almost no value, they got them transferred into AAA, there has never been an opportunity for original shareholders to divest as it remained delisted. Always though RB made sure he was holding all the aces, and took the larger stakes in Monchichi, AAA, and Aquaa by putting in anything but money. Options, gifts etc. The guy literally made money out of nothing and left everyone behind with nothing. The only thing in the hands of AAA is now a 30% stake in a smart insurance AI app that when it's loaded onto the users mobile, could help decipher if they're an dangerous and uninsurable driver or not. Sentiance have yet to show how they gonna monetise this, if they do, it would be nice. They seem to have caught on to all the attributes of AI in their name, but very little AI in their business. |
Posted at 07/8/2023 05:38 by daddycoold Aqua a company that AAA invested in was real. It was single handedly ran by its CEO, as he bounced from one HNW investor to the next to raise more money but ultimately was unable to nail anyone down. With the clock ticking he ran out of money and out of convincing stories. The funds to continue his dream were wrapped up in Audioboom, Audioboom for lack of better judgement as AAA was suspended became a AAA mk2, and saw a huge spike in interest. It's share price shot up, investors piled in. The coup de grâce, the final nail in the coffin, was when the CEO let the super secret out that HLVFM were buying Boom at £30+ a share. The perfect shorting opportunity. Everyone's been fiddled out of their hard earned end of. The FCA will do nothing. |
Posted at 30/7/2023 08:52 by daddycoold The new management want to out Bonnier and his mates. Get their money back that he borrowed, but claims he didn't borrow, then with Rosen try and takeover sentiance. In the meantime everything's stuck cos Bonnier is being a typical stalwart, uncompromising and only interested in his own personal fortune despite the financial interests of all the investors who backed up his plan. |
Posted at 15/1/2023 07:43 by daddycoold Basically they're suggesting the scent of Bonniers deception and legacy as a full time scammer and sociopath. Deceiving the investors of his plan whilst making money for himself and his mates. Alongside that no providing tax returns for his ill gotten gains. |
Posted at 09/11/2022 21:25 by daddycoold Law360, London (September 7, 2022, 5:02 PM BST) -- The target of property entrepreneur Nick Candy's High Court share-fraud lawsuit says he is owed up to £150 million ($172 million) in damages from falsely obtained worldwide freezing orders that allegedly turned his technology company into a "credit risk."Lawyers representing Robert Bonnier, who made his name as a dotcom-era technology investor, told the court on Wednesday that freezing orders obtained by Candy against his company, Aaqua BV, should not have been issued. A freezing order was discharged on Aug. 31 after Candy failed to stump up £1.5 million in cash or obtain a £10 million bank guarantee."It is now clear that the WFOs against the defendants were made on a false basis and ought never to have been made," Bonnier argued in documents submitted to court. Lawyers for Bonnier say in court documents that his business was worth £195 million before the freezing orders were granted and is likely to have lost between 50% and 75% of its value. Bonnier is asking the High Court for an inquiry into damages. But the court refused to expedite that process on Wednesday.Stephen Robins QC, counsel for Bonnier and his company, said they have "been left exposed to a credit risk we never should have faced." Candy has "misstated" the value of his assets and has "refused to answer legitimate questions about the accounts that have been put before the court," Robins added.Candy is suing Bonnier and his companies in an effort to get back shares in Audioboom Group PLC, a popular podcast platform he swapped in a business deal. Candy claims that his fellow entrepreneur lied to him about having interest from Apple and luxury brand LVMH in a new social media platform to encourage investment.Candy alleges that he was a victim of a conspiracy after giving up 1.5 million shares in Audioboom, which is listed on the U.K.'s Alternative Investment Market.Bonnier is accused in the claim of making false representations about the prospects of Aaqua to get Candy Ventures to invest. Bonnier falsely claimed that Apple Inc. and LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton were "founding partners" of his company, which was "critical" to Candy Venture's decision to invest, the lawsuit says.Aaqua, which describes itself as a "social experience" focused on people's "passions," has denied the claims and says they will be contested through the courts.The company says the freezing orders caused serious damage to the reputations of Aaqua and Bonnier and subsequently led external investors to nix proposed investments. The orders also caused panic among the company's 190 employees, some of whom chose to leave, the defendants say.Aaquaverse Pte. Ltd., which is based in Singapore, also had to file for insolvency protection as a result of the WFOs, according to court documents.Alec Haydon QC, counsel for Candy and his investment vehicle Candy Ventures Sarl, told the court that the freezing orders were being used as a "convenient scapegoat" to explain Aaqua's financial difficulties. The freezing injunction was in play only between July 26 and Aug. 31, Haydon said."Aaqua was a company that had already been run into the ground and was already contemplating insolvency," Haydon added.He said the court should bear in mind the difference between losses caused by the allegations of fraud in the proceedings and losses caused by the WFOs.According to the claim, Candy Ventures was persuaded to sign three agreements in February 2021 based on false statements about the involvement of Apple and LVMH in Netherlands-based Aaqua. The company now wants the High Court to declare these agreements "validly rescinded."Under a purchase agreement signed by the two companies, Aaqua paid £6.8 million to Candy Ventures and gained an 18.12% share in Audioboom, the claim reads. Candy Ventures would pay Aaqua 7.5 million ($7.4 million) for 15,000 block shares in return.Candy Ventures says the information it relied on to enter into this agreement was "false" and that at no time since it invested has the company been given any evidence that Apple or LVMH had planned to put money in.Candy Ventures is represented by Alec Haydon QC of Brick Court Chambers, instructed by Grosvenor Law.The defendants are represented by Stephen Robins QC of South Square Chambers and Hermione Williams of New Square Chambers, instructed by Wallace LLP.The case is Candy Ventures Sarl v. Aaqua BV and others, case number CL-2022-000367, in the Commercial Court, Queen's Bench Division of the High Court of Justice of England and Wales.Read more at: https://www.law360.c |
Posted at 08/9/2022 10:14 by lordcsuka1 Law360, London (September 7, 2022, 5:02 PM BST) -- The target of property entrepreneur Nick Candy's High Court share-fraud lawsuit says he is owed up to £150 million ($172 million) in damages from falsely obtained worldwide freezing orders that allegedly turned his technology company into a "credit risk."Lawyers representing Robert Bonnier, who made his name as a dotcom-era technology investor, told the court on Wednesday that freezing orders obtained by Candy against his company, Aaqua BV, should not have been issued. A freezing order was discharged on Aug. 31 after Candy failed to stump up £1.5 million in cash or obtain a £10 million bank guarantee. "It is now clear that the WFOs against the defendants were made on a false basis and ought never to have been made," Bonnier argued in documents submitted to court. Lawyers for Bonnier say in court documents that his business was worth £195 million before the freezing orders were granted and is likely to have lost between 50% and 75% of its value. Bonnier is asking the High Court for an inquiry into damages. But the court refused to expedite that process on Wednesday. Stephen Robins QC, counsel for Bonnier and his company, said they have "been left exposed to a credit risk we never should have faced." Candy has "misstated" the value of his assets and has "refused to answer legitimate questions about the accounts that have been put before the court," Robins added. Candy is suing Bonnier and his companies in an effort to get back shares in Audioboom Group PLC, a popular podcast platform he swapped in a business deal. Candy claims that his fellow entrepreneur lied to him about having interest from Apple and luxury brand LVMH in a new social media platform to encourage investment. Candy alleges that he was a victim of a conspiracy after giving up 1.5 million shares in Audioboom, which is listed on the U.K.'s Alternative Investment Market. Bonnier is accused in the claim of making false representations about the prospects of Aaqua to get Candy Ventures to invest. Bonnier falsely claimed that Apple Inc. and LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton were "founding partners" of his company, which was "critical" to Candy Venture's decision to invest, the lawsuit says. Aaqua, which describes itself as a "social experience" focused on people's "passions," has denied the claims and says they will be contested through the courts. The company says the freezing orders caused serious damage to the reputations of Aaqua and Bonnier and subsequently led external investors to nix proposed investments. The orders also caused panic among the company's 190 employees, some of whom chose to leave, the defendants say. Aaquaverse Pte. Ltd., which is based in Singapore, also had to file for insolvency protection as a result of the WFOs, according to court documents. Alec Haydon QC, counsel for Candy and his investment vehicle Candy Ventures Sarl, told the court that the freezing orders were being used as a "convenient scapegoat" to explain Aaqua's financial difficulties. The freezing injunction was in play only between July 26 and Aug. 31, Haydon said. "Aaqua was a company that had already been run into the ground and was already contemplating insolvency," Haydon added. He said the court should bear in mind the difference between losses caused by the allegations of fraud in the proceedings and losses caused by the WFOs. According to the claim, Candy Ventures was persuaded to sign three agreements in February 2021 based on false statements about the involvement of Apple and LVMH in Netherlands-based Aaqua. The company now wants the High Court to declare these agreements "validly rescinded." Under a purchase agreement signed by the two companies, Aaqua paid £6.8 million to Candy Ventures and gained an 18.12% share in Audioboom, the claim reads. Candy Ventures would pay Aaqua €7.5 million ($7.4 million) for 15,000 block shares in return. Candy Ventures says the information it relied on to enter into this agreement was "false" and that at no time since it invested has the company been given any evidence that Apple or LVMH had planned to put money in. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
