Aeorema Communications Share Discussion Threads

[clocktower] 20/12/2016 11:22

Come on ramas, "Zero Cost" every production costs, no such thing as zero cost - costs might be low and staff might well be better doing something rather than sitting on their hands or having a long Christmas Party but do you not think they have already considered your idea? Maybe they need you on the board, rather than Owen who hardly owns a share and is way past retirement age anyway.

[clocktower] 14/12/2016 12:20

OT. LOL

Why use bombs when poisons will be more effective - a drop or two in our water supply and bye bye - maybe the program of conquer by disease is already underway.

Safer underwater - buy seabed estate and build, and a hell of a lot safer than trying to settle on Mars.

[stockdoo] 14/12/2016 04:49

Great stock analysis video! Check it out!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_u5f73_I8U&t=205s

[old thumper] 14/12/2016 03:54

CT, Now Capt Trump is showing that he's not going to be pushed around by the Chinese and with us seen as USA(2), the Chinese will sell up (enforced by the government) their thousands and thousands of empty properties here (prior to bombing us - they're not mugs). Then the rental market will be flooded with cheap places, oh dear.

No, do the right thing, sell up and buy your 10% here, you know you want to. I could help you out with stock if you have problems but it would be in 3 figures.

[mark1000] 13/12/2016 23:43

Ramas post 3909 I think you should write to them its not a bad idea as an occasional infill must be better than resting between GIGS.

[clocktower] 13/12/2016 08:20

OT, you are correct I am bearish on property but would not discard solid income bearing assets.

4% is hardly a big holding, 10% yes but the buyer would need to invest a lot more to get it there, as unlikely to pick up sufficient stock at sub 28p without further bad news, now that it has become clear that there is a stake builder in the mix.

[old thumper] 13/12/2016 04:19

CT, I thought you are bearish on properties? Go up town and look at all the up market towers full of flats all dark at night, the market will blow.

ramas, Please don't say that, or can RL bring some expertise to the company? I'm happy with the BoD all we need is a bit of luck. It just appears out of the blue, bit like big holders.

[ramas] 12/12/2016 19:13

I don't see RL as a passive investor ..... interesting

[clocktower] 12/12/2016 16:57

LOL - Other than properties - Now 90% Cash OT - only 10% left in equities having adjusted the portfolio. Dead money yes, have missed out on several blue chip rises of late but will wait to see how 2017 kicks off.

[old thumper] 12/12/2016 14:11

Come on CT, own up, it's you.

[clocktower] 12/12/2016 11:28

Nice stake building r. Looks great value long term.

[old thumper] 10/12/2016 04:22

Ambitious move by 21st to buyout Sky, I knew we'd use the cash one day.....Oh hang on, wrong 21st :-)

Still, at least the Media sector is in play.

[clocktower] 08/12/2016 10:19

OT - How long will that cash last if they have to make cuts?

ramas - if you like companies that makes lots of clips then look at BBSN - not profitable yet but worth keeping an eye on as it also still has a cash pile.Maybe to early to invest in but put it up on your watch list.

[ramas] 08/12/2016 08:27

And zero cost to try this out when you have spare capacity

[ramas] 08/12/2016 08:26

I have always thought AEO has the potential to generate additional funds via you tube media and should revisit this potential ... there are lots of sensible clips out there , get a million viewers and that's £10k per month per stream straight to the bottom line , and AEO have the kit to put some great work out there ....

[old thumper] 08/12/2016 03:56

Make you right on the property slump, sooner or later it will end in tears.

"Cash" doesn't AEO have lots of it??

[clocktower] 07/12/2016 08:17

OT - R might be a friendly buyer building a stake before an offer is made - it crossed my mind that Rupert could be ramas on the other hand.:-)

To clear up the 15p target and 35p buy out - without the likes of a stake builder (for reasons unknown)I may have expected it to fall to that level when the final results are delivered. However, the 35p was just a suggested figure should the company be taken private - as for your comments about buying in at 10p - the cash etc have increased considerably since then as has the value of the business, if it can be turned back once again into a cash machine, rather than faltering on a rocky road and failing to meet expectations - even theirs, which now seem to be pretty low, or so as they appear to project imo.

Still it did come closer to my 20p target than you would have liked, not that I take any satisfaction in seeing any investors assets dwindle in the way they have if invested here recently.

In general I view it as a very risky time and I can see it being better short in 2017 than long in many stocks. Cash & Gold will be king again if there is a property slump 2017/2018.

[old thumper] 07/12/2016 03:37

What happen there? Fat finger syndrome perhaps.

[old thumper] 07/12/2016 03:33

CT I bit of unfortunate timing yesterday I think?

You were a 20p man then dropped to 15p, within minutes a RNS appeared and now your a 35p man. Can't wait for today's price.

Rupert holds >3% in another company I'm invested in, another company way below it's worth, welcome to AEO.

As for going private, can't see it this happening as this will being Mike Hale buying himself out, remember he brought in at 10p. More like a ten bagger return would be more acceptable for his expertise input and belief in the company.

Our day will come.

[old thumper] 07/12/2016 03:33

CT I bit of unfortunate timing yesterday I think?

You were a 20p man then dropped to 15p, within minutes a RNS appeared and now your a 35p man. Can't wait for today's price.

Rupert holds >3% in another company I'm invested in, another company way below it's worth, welcome to AEO.

As for going private, can't see it this happening as this will being Mike Hale buying himself out, remember he brought in at 10p. More like a ten bagger return would be more acceptable for his expertise input and belief in the company.

Our day will come.

[ramas] 06/12/2016 17:43

Rupert Labrums been hoovering up the stock ...interesting google maybe a long term investor with ideas ? Clearly it's not just me that sees the recent reaction as excessive ....

[clocktower] 06/12/2016 09:34

Seems like we have serious support at this level.Maybe betting it goes private, then how much - 35p maybe

[clocktower] 06/12/2016 09:05

OT - you can bet your bottom dollar that "anticipated levels" were low, as they had already warned(as you pointed out) that the road would be rocky back in Jan. It now seems that they are dealing with a situation that they might be hopeless at correcting. When one is on a slippery slide one needs more than past success to drag ones team upwards, in fact it would come as no surprise that they might have to cut a few loose to try to avoid dragging the whole team over the cliff, so to speak.

That cash pile might only cushion the crash for investors and those that are cut from the team in an effort to survive the fallout.

New target 15p Good Luck.

[old thumper] 06/12/2016 03:47

Yesterday's trading statement was a restatement of comments made in the Jan interim's and Oct finals, the company always seems to take a cautious stance unlike other AIM companies who like politicians promise the world and come up with little (eg, Trump. Now with Mad Dog why bother investing?)

"As a result, the Board of the Company now believes that trading during the second six months of the year will be below anticipated levels."

As I have no knowledge of the anticipated levels so it's hard to know how to take that one.

Some one had a hair trigger yesterday with a 50,000 trade within minutes of the statement, fast reader? Perhaps it was a automatic trade sell by their broker reacting to a drop, however yesterday LSE showed it as a buy? Tricky to say.

Always darkest before the dawn, well it is 3.45am :-)