ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for charts Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.

AVO Advanced Oncotherapy Plc

1.925
0.00 (0.00%)
19 Apr 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Advanced Oncotherapy Investors - AVO

Advanced Oncotherapy Investors - AVO

Share Name Share Symbol Market Stock Type
Advanced Oncotherapy Plc AVO London Ordinary Share
  Price Change Price Change % Share Price Last Trade
0.00 0.00% 1.925 01:00:00
Open Price Low Price High Price Close Price Previous Close
1.925 1.925
more quote information »
Industry Sector
HEALTH CARE EQUIPMENT & SERVICES

Top Investor Posts

Top Posts
Posted at 17/12/2023 17:05 by gclark
Another option is to set up class A and class B shares, where the new investors get first call on capital should the company be wound up, and perhaps receive special dividends up to say 20%-30% of the value of their investment before shareholders in the other class of shares (us) join in the receipt of dividends. So they get 20%-30% of their money back before we see any benefit. Whether the shares would be listed, I don't know.

There are ways to make things fair and acceptable for both parties ... I am sure they are working on it ...
Posted at 30/11/2023 15:48 by nappe
I know someone who worked there. But think about it, they have run out of funding, where does the money come from to pay the wages since April?I've no axe to grind here, I'm an investor, I really want them to succeed, it's great technology, but I think that my investment is long gone, I've basically written it off, if they pull a rabbit out of the hat, I'll be delighted, but I have to be realistic in my expectations.
Posted at 23/10/2023 12:00 by gerhart
Still talking - they/we still hoping. Timelines still sliding.

How much dilution will we face?

Today's RNS very blunt about prospects of failure to seal a deal. Would small investors be better off, if we had a "sale".

Of course, if there were any potential buyers, they will probably watch to see (if they can) what prospects for finance deal are. No prospects - cheap offer. Apparent good news on that would see increased offer - or a walk away.

All we can do is continue to cross-fingers. And also hope better business managers come onboard. Scientists and "medics" are great. But to avoid future disasters, assuming we make it through, this company badly needs a few new business heads - who can plan properly!
Posted at 20/6/2023 16:01 by daijavu
The main thing that keeps me invested is the technology. The main thing that worries me is the BoD.

The finances shouldn't bother anyone that much because the technology is so valuable that it should outweigh all other considerations and make AVO a must have company to invest in.

Unfortunately, the company and investors have been let down by the BoD so often over the 10 years I've been watching AVO, and in and out of holding the shares, that it's no surprise to me that AVO is now in the situation it's in.

I'm waiting until the risk of it going into administration is out of the way before I put any more 'real money' in.
Posted at 02/5/2023 09:40 by gerhart
From the last RNS:

"The Company is presently in discussions with investors to raise additional funding under this loan note agreement on the same terms as previously announced - which may include further subscriptions by directors of the Company.
The Board of the Company is confident on concluding this additional financing which would extend the Company's cash runway from end of April 2023 until the end of May 2023".

So no update on 2nd May. Have we run out of cash. Or was there confidence spot on and they raised the money required to keep us going until the end of May? Toss a coin, I guess?
Posted at 03/3/2023 19:50 by pj84
Gerhart my average is just under 26p and given that I am showing an 80% loss it seems almost as stupid as your 40p, however I doubt there are many current holders not showing big losses.

I am also very concerned by the recent RNS's and the implications for funding but agree the fact they still are including the exercise price of the warrants as 25p does give rise to some hope, however small, that they see a realistic chance of it returning to a price above that.

The only other thing that gives a small amount of comfort is that the directors holdings are considerably larger than mine and I suspect larger than most private investors, so at least they are well aware of the pain we are experiencing and have quite an incentive to turn it around.

Liquid Harmony Limited* 45,757,097 8.51%
Michael Sinclair and Family 9,440,814 1.76%
Mr Michael S Bradfield 8,354,240 1.55%
Dr P N Plowman 4,675,304 0.87%
Dr Enrico C Vanni 4,076,361 0.76%
Mr Nicolas Serandour 2,177,134 0.41%
Mr Steve Myers 1,540,569 0.29%
Mr Hans Van Celsing 982,499 0.18%
Mrs Lori Cross 293,749 0.06%

* This holding includes shares held by Mrs. RenHua Zhang and associated partners.

The science and opportunity all seems to be moving in the right direction. Let's hope we can get there.
Posted at 01/3/2023 17:36 by twirl
par555>> omens are bad - really bad and Tom Winnifreth has done a bearcast (which has a paywall) but bound to be negative.

I hope something can be salvaged for all the LTH - apart from the Board who have led investors up the garden path.
Posted at 01/3/2023 11:10 by gerhart
At end of Dec most/all key directors bought shares around 12p. Just a few weeks later they issue financial plans. Share price goes on major slide.

So did the directors buy, knowing any placing/rights (along with any financial loans) will be well above 12p.

Or did they buy to give the impression, that they were suffering too, knowing share price would take a hit on speculation once the plans were announced - which they must have known general intentions when they bought.

I think and hope it is the former. All those big investors that stumped up big sums previously must have known the long term risk/plans for final funds to bring Tech to fruition. So wouldn't have stumped-up just to watch their investment collapse.

So this share price slide is due to negative speculation only? That's my hope.

(happened, justifiably, before when they got into the death spiral shares for loans. Shares dumped. Price fell. Even greater shares for loans. Shares dumped, price fell...etc etc. Then they changed track, and their was massive spike)
Posted at 20/1/2023 10:27 by twirl
Yes a company with a market cap of £55m wants to raise £75m+ with no turnover and the only asset being a device with massive prospects but for which they have no orders. Lol
Presumably the only taker would be a v wealthy individual who would want to do a deal with the directors but extinguish the interests of private investors.
Posted at 22/12/2022 17:29 by twirl
Daijavu>> Nice to hear from you. It is indeed a tragedy that a product with such potential is being held back by this BoD when they could have sold the rights etc to a large pharma that could afford to develop it at pace. That would with hindsight have provided a better return for investors.

Instead we have been led up the garden path of Chinese hospitals and Harley St. and endless dilution.

Fortunately I sold out at an uncomfortable loss years ago and have learn't a hard lesson.

Turnover is King.

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock