Active Energy Share Discussion Threads

[isa2020] 17/2/2020 11:25

The un factual article, maybe a blessingAs it doesn't even mention test results from Utah or Poland.Many people are going to base what they read - which in itself isn't good for AEGplc, however - the article should be amended (unlikely) drawing eyes to AEGplcOr when it comes to 16 of March, when all the facts are put on the table, Poland/EU Environmental Clearance, Utah University testing etc, the environmental argument impact would change.As it would show, they are not informed of the facts, a plus to AEGplc.In an ideal world, would be nice for AEGplc to start the meeting on a positive, however that's not realistic, someone going to complain - our competition is going to make some noise somewhere to slow things down.

[win2003] 17/2/2020 11:12

might be the issue. IMHO, DYOR etc

[placing] 17/2/2020 10:47

given this awkward rns and the out of no where open public letter, what is the chance of permit delay? just in case!

[ileeman] 17/2/2020 10:45

Nice find!

[grsshaw1] 17/2/2020 10:37

hxxps://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Air%20Quality/permits/2020_public_notice_documents/draft-reviews/Active-Energy-Permit-7800242.pdf

Draft Permit

[garth] 17/2/2020 10:32

Thank you for the link."we will be operating well below any threshold required in the permit by virtue of the recapturing/abating equipment adopted'That sounds to me like they may already know what the permit says and can work well within it.G.

[grsshaw1] 17/2/2020 10:25

Dear Ms. Sorg,
I serve as a Director for AEG, PLC and live in North Carolina. As a company involved in the
Renewable Energy industry, Active Energy Group is a firm proponent of a green economy and
perfectly understands the concerns that emerge with the growth of the biomass industry (both
from the perspective of the scientific claims and due to potential impacts on local resources and
communities where operations are located).
Our understanding drives our effort to develop integrated systems that can, through a mix of
new technologies, low impact logistics, sustainable resources and fair business practices, truly
qualify as renewable.
Toward this end we seek to avoid confusion and thus are compelled to help further inform you
and assist with clarifying the incorrect assumptions used to substantiate your article about our
initiative in Lumberton, NC.
Our small R&D pilot plant (5 tph) which is not a white pellet mill, is going to be developed with
the goal to prove that a carbon neutral/negative zero/low emission approach can be achieved in
the industry.
The higher energy dense clean fiber-based steam exploded pellet, CoalSwitch TM, when used
for energy production (as proven by independent test runs with the University of Utah) will not
generate more emission than coal and provide the added benefit of greatly reducing or
eliminating the emission of Sulphur Oxides and other harmful emission.
Furthermore, our CoalSwitch TM process will allow the sourcing of feedstock from waste/
residual fiber streams and the use of locally grown energy crops with an annual or even semiannual rotation for a truly carbon neutral approach. Further, there is the possible benefit of
reclaiming marginal lands and/or developing other socially useful and responsible projects such
as afforestation/reforestation.
Moreover, the final stages of our process will explore the energy generation of the whole system
requirements by harnessing solar and in the longer term, the use of an electric fleet for
transportation. As our first analysis indicates, these opportunities should qualify it, albeit
modestly, as carbon negative.
Lastly, regarding the local impact of the manufacturing plant in Lumberton, we will be operating
well below any threshold required in the permit by virtue of the recapturing/abating equipment
adopted.
We hope that this brief explanation will at least highlight the systemic and responsible approach
AEG intends for developing its initiative in Lumberton.
As a company we welcome any open and factual dialogue. We have engaged in earnest with
the local community since we became interested in the property and well prior to acquisition. I
invite you to contact AEG for further information you might require.
Sincerely
A.Esposito

[grsshaw1] 17/2/2020 10:23

hxxps://www.aegplc.com/download/open-letter-to-ms-sorg/?wpdmdl=2536

From LSE site posted by Bobby

[rocketfuel1] 17/2/2020 10:13

I think the Environmental concerns in the article have good intentions but a little more research about what AEG is doing, where its target markets are and where we fit as a small but useful piece of the no sun, no wind debate would have been better.

I have slagged this company off for the past two years but even i have stopped to give them a chance....a final chance. IF run with any professionalism this could be a big multi bagger stock.

[rumobejo] 17/2/2020 09:41

nice chunks going on, keep it up...

[ileeman] 17/2/2020 09:38

"But some individuals and lobby groups will, naturally, be against it."

People will moan about anything but are irrelevant.

[rumobejo] 17/2/2020 09:03

why the just didn't put it in the rns, hmm...

[garth] 17/2/2020 08:16

PT,

I can see a link in "Investors" to say that they have released a letter, but not the letter itself...

I am of the opinion that the evidence we have available suggests the opposite - Carolina support the plant. But some individuals and lobby groups will, naturally, be against it.

G.

[ileeman] 17/2/2020 08:16

Added 500k at 0.64p, chart breakout looking juicy.

[plumbertrade] 17/2/2020 07:42

It's nothing you don't already know But gives no detail about the "factually incorrect " article My assumption is that "North Carolina "are against AEG's coal switch plant

[plumbertrade] 17/2/2020 07:40

Go to investors then scroll right down to the bottom. You'll find a link It's BS

[teraferma] 17/2/2020 07:38

Why do companies do this, why not just provide a direct link on the RNS, really lazy IMO

[skinny] 17/2/2020 07:35

I've asked them via their website.

[hammer28] 17/2/2020 07:19

I can't see it on their website! it should be on the home page if its an open letter. This is so frustrating!

[garth] 17/2/2020 07:16

Can't see it in the Investor section.I assume it is in response to the piece of creative writing the link was provided to over the weekend. They hadn't even done enough research to get the pellet picture right. They showed white pellets, AEGs are black. Different manufacturing process.G.

[teraferma] 17/2/2020 07:06

One found the open letter on the website?

[cottoner] 16/2/2020 13:41

Difficult to imagine AEG won't be given the permit given the quote from local authorities personnel.

Robeson County Manager, Kellie Blue said, "North Carolina and Robeson County are committed to a sustainable future and welcome businesses with environmental goals, like AEG. We look forward to supporting AEG, its activities at the Lumberton Site and AEG's aim of transforming residual biomass material into high-value carbon neutral fuels for the power industry. We continue to support AEG through the final stages of the Permit approval process."

[ileeman] 16/2/2020 13:15

Added another 500k after the pullback from 0.69p Friday, hard to imagine this doesnt trend towards 1p especially with the permit meeting penciled in for 16th of March.