We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aa Plc | LSE:AA. | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BMSKPJ95 | ORD 0.1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 34.95 | 34.95 | 35.00 | - | 0.00 | 00:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
22/2/2018 00:12 | Minerve, please keep cool. :) | tradejunkie2 | |
21/2/2018 23:40 | LMAO!!! PUGUGLY 4 Aug '17 - 18:32 - 56 of 217 0 0 0 Another Woodford disasters RM2 and Allied Minds to add but 2 - Just goes to show no one can walk on water for ever. | tradejunkie2 | |
21/2/2018 20:36 | When are the results due? | cryptotrade | |
21/2/2018 19:01 | The FCF yield is too good to ignore IMO. In which case might I suggest you take a look at the balance sheet - you may change your mind! | nigelpm | |
21/2/2018 18:51 | Minerve I agree as I have just been reading through parts and articles myself. I actually thought it would actually do okay today as it reduced the dividend sensibly, funded growth with the dividend reduction and stated it was well funded. Targeting new drivers with technology etc was the right move I thought dyor. But as mentioned here debt is an issue in time. | srpactive | |
21/2/2018 18:24 | inchpractice If you are not in desperate need to replace the reduced forward income announced today (reduced dividend down to 2p/annum) then I would hold on to your share. There is no news today that, to me, screams sell. In fact, having spent almost all day digesting the information I see it as positive; the company has at last recognised its PE history and is being transparent and honest about where it is heading and what it needs to do. I think there is a risk that the final results may disappoint a little but I also think there is potential upside risk too. I think both are marginal. I am no longer concerned about the debt profile even though I acknowledge it is high. I will most likely be increasing my holding here and between now and the results might be a good opportunity to do so. The FCF yield is too good to ignore IMO. | minerve | |
21/2/2018 17:35 | jonwig, it was an O trade uncrossing trades are UT there were 2 trades before it as well for 250k and 383k shares | notimpressed | |
21/2/2018 17:32 | snape - I think it was the private equity owners who loaded it up with debt before floating it a few years ago. Google for details. | zho | |
21/2/2018 17:26 | Quick question if someone here can help. How did AA rack up all this debt? | snape | |
21/2/2018 17:17 | @ notimpressed - post #203: that was the closing auction uncrossing. Sorry to deflate. | jonwig | |
21/2/2018 17:12 | Sure the brand will survive that does not neccessarily mean that the shareholders equity will survive :) | spob | |
21/2/2018 16:48 | ...If you believe AA has a future this is a bargain.... | pbutterworth1 | |
21/2/2018 16:46 | It was suggested earlier this is another Yell. Actually, I must disagree. Yell faced a market in terminal decline. Contratry to popular beleif I think breakdowns have a bright future. Not least because increasing electronics brings a whole new raft of new problems including battery drains. The barnd will survive. GLA all | pbutterworth1 | |
21/2/2018 15:45 | It is pretty simple the AA is a small company with a large debt mountain attached to it! | bc4 | |
21/2/2018 15:09 | Jonwig Yes. I got that. I am taking BE's word. He doesn't make many mistakes and I will in-time be checking myself. I was hoping some other investor would enlighten us without me having to do all the donkey work. | minerve | |
21/2/2018 15:06 | FT Alphaville covered AA. and made suggestions that the debt covenants would prevent a rights issue and were in any case pretty onerous. (I've scanned the latest AR and can't find details.) | jonwig | |
21/2/2018 14:40 | In some ways the non-ability to have a rights issue - because of the terms - is enabling a wonderful FCFE yield for current shareholders (with no future dilution). The downside is it continues a significant amount of risk if debt costs increase or memberships continue to drift. | minerve | |
21/2/2018 14:37 | Free Cash Flow to Equity = c17.8% FY21e, no? | minerve | |
21/2/2018 14:30 | Yes agree debt a problem for all companies, once a little more stable, due to reducing dividend and hopefully increasing growth, dyor. Come on Mr Woodford shake this up. | srpactive | |
21/2/2018 14:26 | srpactive, Servicing debt indefinitely .... At some point the lender will want their principle back. Alternative is to roll it forward (if they can), at shareholders cost, making the shareholder a second class citizen, effectively handing control to the lender. Cash | cashandcard | |
21/2/2018 14:07 | J Agree debt is an issue for all companies, but servicing it is the important point as most companies have debt. Why does it need paying off completely? And I respect what Mr Woodford has achieved, everyone makes mistakes, I feel he will come good again, even the US sage WB bought tsco didn't he, dyor. | srpactive | |
21/2/2018 14:05 | cryptotrade, As above, £2.7bln - a relative mountain of debt. Cash | cashandcard |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions