Find Your Broker
Name Symbol Market Market Cap ($) Algorithm
Bitcoin BTCUSD Crypto 64,881,166,229 SHA-256d
  Price Change Price Change % Current Price Bid Price Offer
  100.87 +2.80% 3,709.21 3,709.20 3,709.21
High Price Low Price Open Price Prev. Close 52 Week Range
3,950.00 3,602.60 3,610.91 3,608.34 3,445.00 - 20,089.00
Exchange Last Trade Size Trade Price Currency
GDAX 16:09:19 0.007514 3,709.21 USD
Price x Volume Volume Base Symbol Related Pairs
38,713,743.70 10,462.55 BTC BTCEUR BTCGBP ETHBTC

Litecoin's Charlie Lee: Decentralized Crypto 'Must Be Susceptible to 51% Attacks'

09/01/2019 10:44am

ADVFN Crypto NewsWire


A decentralized cryptocurrency is by definition vulnerable to 51 percent attacks, the creator of Litecoin (LTC) Charlie Lee stated in a tweet Jan. 7.

In the wake of recent news about unusual mining activity on the Ethereum Classic (ETC) network — which many continue to refer to as a 51 percent attack — Lee shared his observation, stating that:

“By definition, a decentralized cryptocurrency must be susceptible to 51% attacks whether by hashrate, stake, and/or other permissionlessly-acquirable resources. If a crypto can't be 51% attacked, it is permissioned and centralized.”

Lee’s statement was in response to another tweet stating that “if it can’t be 51% attacked, it isn’t decentralized,” from Twitter user CryptoTesla. The tweet was made in response to Coinbase's announcement revealing it had detected “chain reorganizations” and double spends on ETC’s blockchain yesterday, Jan. 7.

Today, Jan. 8, Coinbase updated the numbers to report that there were 12 additional reorganizations that included double spends totaling 219,500 ETC (about $1.1 million).

Coinbase announced they had suspend deposits and withdrawals of ETC on Jan. 5, with the freeze evidently still in place by press time.

On Jan. 7, ETC developers denied the reports that the hashpower consolidation was in fact a 51 percent attack, stating that it was “most likely selfish mining” and that double spends did not take place.

Later, the ETC team stated in a tweet that the increased hashrate might be attributed to the testing of new 1,400/Mh Ethash machines by application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) manufacturer Linzhi. However, Linzhi Shenzhen's director of operations denied these claims in a tweet that has since been deleted.

By press time, the ETC team has refrained from applying the term “51% attack” to the incident. One of their most recent tweets on the issue from today repeats a request to all crypto exchanges and mining pools to significantly increase confirmation time on all withdrawals and deposits.



Source: CoinTelegraph

1 Year Bitcoin Chart

1 Year Bitcoin Chart

1 Month Bitcoin Chart

1 Month Bitcoin Chart
Your Recent History
COIN
BTCUSD
Bitcoin
Register now to watch these stocks streaming on the ADVFN Monitor.

Monitor lets you view up to 110 of your favourite stocks at once and is completely free to use.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P: V:gb D:20190119 16:09:20