We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now


It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

LIFE Love Hemp Group PLC

0.00 (0.0%)
- - Closed
Realtime Data
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Love Hemp Group PLC AQSE:LIFE Aquis Stock Exchange Ordinary Share GB00BMDY1P48
  Price Change % Change Share Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.0% 0.00 -
Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Last Trade Time Trade Type Trade Size Trade Price Currency
- 0 GBX

Love Hemp (LIFE) Latest News

Love Hemp (LIFE) Discussions and Chat

No Forum Threads FoundAdd a New Thread

Love Hemp (LIFE) Most Recent Trades

No Trades
Trade Time Trade Price Trade Size Trade Value Trade Type

Love Hemp (LIFE) Top Chat Posts

Top Posts
Posted at 18/8/2021 20:44 by rolo7
zac from vox markets has 3.5p to 6p target on love hemp bear in mind main stock market placing so a higher share price than the last raise at 3.5p would be good?!
Posted at 01/5/2018 13:39 by arfurontherocks
Anyone make sense of this what does it mean for existing share holders ?

life science website is gone & now comes up bradda head

Bradda Head Holdings Limited (formerly Life Science Developments Limited) was incorporated and registered in the British Virgin Islands on 28 October 2009 for the purpose of making investments and/or acquisitions in the natural resources sector.
Posted at 10/4/2017 11:02 by banshee
You have to ask yourself, was it ever LIFE's intention to act as a genuine, unconstrained, investment seeking shell?

Given that in their founding EGM 'mission statement' (see above post 263) they demonstrably and dishonourably mislead their investors by pledging an EGM to return residual cash in the event of delisting, which they have subsequently refused to hold - the reasonable question then arises - was the rest of that statement also disingenuous at best?

I.e. did LIFE ever seriously intend to consider anything apart from Mellon's deeply unloved baby, the Diabetic Boot Co, as an 'investment'?

Now you have the blackly farcical situation where LIFE's twin assets, ie the cash and the AIM listing, have been squandered in the single minded, yet so far comically unsuccessful, pursuit of a non exec director (Jim Mellon) related party deal - with that same unloved baby the DBC, and, (especially preposterous this bit), at a price level apparently much higher than other Mellon associated companies had already declined to further invest in said DBC at.

It seems this unpopularity meant the DBC could not even be listed on the AIM before the deadline expired, and may well never be, making LIFE's enthusiastic, unrequited courtship, where others sensibly feared to tread - beyond ludicrous.

And that low interest, unsecured loan, that LIFE has chosen to extend, rather than refund its shareholders as promised - oh dear. When Mellon himself was obliged to step in with a further 2 million loan to re-bailout said DBC a few months later, he sensibly made sure it was fully secured.

In whose interests has all this happened? I find it very hard to believe personally that it has been in any way, shape or form in LIFE the company's interests, which in law were supposed to be the Directors' prime concern, but perhaps that's just me :)
Posted at 06/10/2016 20:12 by banshee
You're in danger of turning into a serial shaftee :(

But LIFE shareholders have the special privilege of paying handsomely to be shafted. The DBC is total dross imo, from an investment point of view, worth a lot closer to £1.50 than £15 million. Mellon appears to have curtailed his own planned investment in it via Regency, presumably on the back of poor performance, and his protege in the FFWD project we are told, won't invest either (even with other peoples money), but LIFE shareholders are being marched forward merrily to fill the gap at a rather higher and more demanding valuation than others, who are better informed, have already turned down - or so it would seem.

It would also seems that LIFE shareholders residual cash investment will only give them a stake pretty much on a par level with the potential new (essential but perhaps also certifiable?) investors per pound invested, whilst the LIFE AIM shell itself, with its substantial accumulated tax losses, is to be a free gift?

This might seem to some to be a ludicrously bad deal. I get the distinct feeling that Mitch Anand is unlikely to be nominated for businessman of the year anytime soon.

Oh, and thanks for the emergency, totally unsecured, financing - on very generous terms indeed, try getting a no strings, where-do-i-sign-to-keep-your-lights-on-who-cares-if-you-go-bust, bail out deal like that from a commercial lender.

All IMO,DYOR etc.
Posted at 29/9/2016 08:50 by fishybits
So a possible investment for LIFE? why mentioned it today if no investment is linned up, could a very exciting week
Posted at 31/8/2016 21:55 by john_l
Let's see what Jim Mellon has to say on Voxmarkets Podcast tomorrow #life
Posted at 30/6/2016 12:55 by moormoney
Results out, cash in the bank and they are working on potential life science deals. I think the share price rise indicates news soon IMO.
Posted at 27/6/2016 20:45 by moormoney
My only blue...well done Life! What's coming I wonder ???
Posted at 02/1/2016 12:21 by hedgehog 100
The third highest riser on Thursday 31st. December, LIFE, has more than doubled recently from 2p:

LSE % Gainers Top Lists
EPIC Name %
GGP Greatland Gold +57%
CLP Clear Leisure +46%
LIFE Life Science De +43%

Price Price Change [%] Bid Offer Open High Low Volume
4.88 1.475 [43.38] 4.75 5.00 3.25 5.25 3.20 3,492,079
Market Cap. [m] Shares In Issue [m] Beta EPS DPS PE Ratio Yield 52-Wks-Range
1.83 37.50 1.65 -28.64 - - - 5.25 - 0.85

This shows the potential of oversold investing companies / shells like LIFE and MMO, at a market cap. of under £1M. and trading at a discount to cash.
Posted at 04/12/2015 10:10 by the stigologist
Incredibly shoddy from the Company and the NOMAD on so many levels

4 December 2015

Life Science Developments Limited
("LIFE" or "the Company")

LIFE Moves to Correct Financial Website Identification of Company

On 5 October 2015, the Company sold its copper project, changed its name and became a life science and biotech investment company; it also appointed Jim Mellon as a non-executive director. Since then, however, some online share quote services have continued to identify LIFE by his old name ("Copper Development Corporation") and have continued to describe the Company as a copper project developer. As a result, one online financial publication issued in recent days reports that incorrectly tied LIFE's share price movements and corporate prospects implicitly to that of the copper mining sector.

Life Science Developments Limited (AIM: LIFE) has now contacted several online share quote services and financial publications to ask them to update their records on LIFE, and have provided the with the correct information, which was in the Company's news announcement on 5 October 2015. The company will monitor this on the Internet to make sure that financial websites provide the correct corporate name and corporate description.

Mitch Alland, Executive Chairman of LIFE, commented:
We are working together with Jim Mellon to embark on our path of biotech investments. Jim has not only been highly successful in pioneering ventures in biotech and life sciences, but is also well known as a knowledgeable and effective entrepreneur and as an author of widely read books on investment.
Love Hemp share price data is direct from the London Stock Exchange

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 |