We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parseq | LSE:PSQ | London | Ordinary Share | GB0004630454 | ORD 1P |
| Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 8.925 | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
| Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - |
| Last Trade Time | Trade Type | Trade Size | Trade Price | Currency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | O | 0 | 8.925 | GBX |
Parseq (PSQ) Share Charts1 Year Parseq Chart |
|
1 Month Parseq Chart |
Intraday Parseq Chart |
| Date | Time | Title | Posts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/11/2013 | 16:00 | Any views on Parseq (Formerly Intelligent Environments) | 969 |
| 20/9/2011 | 12:12 | Parseq - What now? | 10 |
| 23/5/2011 | 09:05 | FRS3 inflates profits at PSQ? | 11 |
| Trade Time | Trade Price | Trade Size | Trade Value | Trade Type |
|---|
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 22/10/2011 09:24 by darias Harrytrad.You can grumble as much as you like but the share price of Documetric has never been over 10p. On that basis the offer is fair. You were unlucky in that you bought at a high with regard to IEN however those shares were revalued and you received 1.18 shares in Documetric and therefore the price of your shares that you paid was equivalent to 11.44. It is true that you have lost money however if you had faith in the board, the company and the group there was ample opportunity, even up to yesterday, to get your average price down. Buying a share is placing a bet there will be winners and losers. |
Posted at 21/10/2011 21:20 by harrytrad3 No mention that the share price was 10p in January in the little `aren`t we wonderful` comments vis increas to average share price over 6months and since August.Rather disappointed in the independent board of directors who are all selling their shares at the agreed price notwithstanding if a higher offer comes in. Not quite sure how they are independent when they all control what they sold for. I think that when this`potential takeover` came up that the housebrokers then target was 8.9 having fallen from an earlier 13p I have just been ripped off, so deep pocketed sources can line their pockets Abbey I suspect that you will find that the share price on Monday is 9p |
Posted at 27/9/2011 09:48 by harrytrad3 Should a share price be suspended in circumstances where it is seemingly being held for a period such as PSQ here.The offer which may or may not be made by Bidco seems to have caused a ceiling and a floor for the share price (which I suppose can be added to the front and middleroom capacities created by the PSQ union of Documetrix and IEN). Perhaps we are creating a building metaphorically. I think interims will be announced this week. But if they sparkle will the share price rise? I suspect not given the current and seeming cap. By the bye where is Estonia? Should therefore, trading be suspended in this share until this unholy (IMHO) is cleared away? |
Posted at 20/9/2011 12:12 by harrytrad3 So here is the thing:the company may or may nor receive an offer within 4 weeks (or presumably anytime sooner) of a price which may or may not be 7.5p, so how is the share price in the interim suppose to find its level. The announcement yesterday must act as a brake on any upward climb or reversal. Just how can this situation be deemed `fairplay`? Is it not in reality another presssure on Shareholders to rush for the door. Does the FSA or anybody else ever investigate matters such as these:? I cannot find the link to the chap who invited comments from PSQ shareholders, would a kind soul direct me to it please? |
Posted at 14/9/2011 14:50 by darias Try as a similar situation exists at PSQ. I say similar however there are some independent directors of M & B whereas the board of PSQ - bar none as far as I can see - are all part of the concert party. The institutional investors of M & B are raising a stink whereas our Institutional investors are silent. All they want is a profit. Reading the good blurb by LCF it seems to me that PSQ is vastly undervalued but all the institutions will look at is short term gain. 8p a share represents a significant profit on the basis of the 7p a share injection in July. |
Posted at 07/9/2011 09:35 by darias It has not shot up as there is the shadow of a take over on the company with no knowledge of the price that is to be offered. The share appears seriously undervalued on the evidence of announcements but not on the last interims. As the concert party considering making an offer hold 44% of the shares and institutions put their money in at 7p an offer price of around 7.5-8 should carry the day. Ie secure the 50% required to make the offer unconditional. On that basis a current share price of less than 7 is realistic. If another bidder were to come in a hostile bid would not be successful so they have to negotiate with the concert party who know the true value of the company. There is a way forward. Get a number of share holders to demand a special general meeting or request the board to seek a time limit for the concert party to make an offer. |
Posted at 24/8/2011 15:06 by harrytrad3 I suspect the intended sale price is 6.5 and the share price has been welocomed to a recent low level of 4.75 so that it might seem that some fairplay is invol;ved.I think the share price target from housebroker a few months back was 13p but that it is currently 7.9p All IMHO DYOR Mel D1 action of the kind you moot would have to be swift. What firm would take it on? |
Posted at 22/8/2011 15:35 by harrytrad3 Not sure I like this. It seems that:He RC (Documetrix) takes out IEN in a reverse takeover (its technology, customers and cash pile) and goes public as PSQ. And is it the case that he now makes an offer for PSQ? With the share price so low on Friday evening, and the company seemingly well set why would shareholders want to lose out now ie to a relatively modest premium which todays increase seems to be. |
Posted at 17/7/2011 11:41 by timstonvasey I have been following PSQ for a while (the chat/share price) and today i've done a been doing a bit of research on the different companies within.The last statement mentioned the services side not doing as well. This looks to comprise of Documentric and Avance Group. Having a look at their websites (shop fronts) both websites look abandoned especially the Avance group which is really dated (designed fully in Flash) . Does anyone know if these 2 co's are going to merged as that would save a lot of ££? The way both sites have not been updated it looks like this maybe on the cards? Please note i don't have an investiment just wondering if anyone mored learned in the PSQ knew the answers? Thanks Tim |
Posted at 31/5/2011 23:33 by gnnmartin Yes, I did (attend), but late, because the address given (142 High Holborn) was wrong: it should have been 142 Holborn. So I missed most of the meeting, and possibly some discussion. I went hoping to talk to Clive Richards, since I feel I know him enough to make the conversation easier, but he wasn't there. Still, I did ask for a bit more detail on the mobile wallet, and got some comforting replies. They own the IP, and can sell the same scheme to another mobile provider should one want to buy it. They get paid for the creation of the software, then get paid for hosting and for maintenance, and if it does well they eventually get a royalty per transaction too. The one oddity that I heard was the tie-up with Visa: since all my cards converted to Mastercard over the last few years, I wonder if that limits the market. Something to look into. I did ask how they felt about going head to head with Google. The reply was that first of all it is O2 going head to head with Google, not PSQ. I'm not over impressed by that, but it does mean that PSQ don't have much to lose if things don't work out: it's just a question of whether they have lots to gain. However, more convincingly, Google are only starting a trial in the USA, and with only 2 banks, where O2 are starting now in the UK, with their large customer base, and with whatever bank the customer uses (subject to that one reservation I have as to whether the tie up with Visa means the customer has to hold a Visa card). I came away from my brief attendance at the meeting feeling that the mobile wallet certainly could be really big, but still not entirely comfortable with the company. I just felt I knew IEN, and don't yet feel I know PSQ. The lockin that came as part of the reverse takeover expires in a couple of months (roughly, I haven't checked exactly). It will be interesting to see if anyone sells. I don't expect they will unless the share price has increased a few pence at least. Nigel Martin |
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
